Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MCB vs DCOM vs FFIC vs NBTB vs KRNY vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
MCB vs DCOM vs FFIC vs NBTB vs KRNY vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $1.01B | $1.77B | $524M | $2.52B | $553M | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $527M | $730M | $489M | $902M | $344M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $71M | $111M | $19M | $169M | $32M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 52.6% | 56.1% | 46.2% | 73.6% | 47.7% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 19.3% | 21.5% | 7.1% | 24.3% | 11.6% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 9.3x | 11.9x | 11.0x | 11.5x | 14.1x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $81M | $371M | $592M | $327M | $1.26B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $394M | $2.35B | $126M | $185M | $167M | $343.34B |
MCB vs DCOM vs FFIC vs NBTB vs KRNY vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Metropolitan Bank H… (MCB) | 100 | 301.2 | +201.2% |
| Dime Community Banc… (DCOM) | 100 | 175.5 | +75.5% |
| Flushing Financial … (FFIC) | 100 | 138.6 | +38.6% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
| Kearny Financial Co… (KRNY) | 100 | 107.5 | +7.5% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MCB vs DCOM vs FFIC vs NBTB vs KRNY vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MCB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in bank quality.
- NIM 3.7% vs KRNY's 1.7%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5%
DCOM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 330.9%
- 13.0% NII/revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3%
- +50.3% vs NBTB's +18.3%
FFIC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 5.7% yield, vs JPM's 1.9%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
KRNY is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.72, yield 5.0%, current ratio 1.20x
- Beta 0.72 vs FFIC's 1.01
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs MCB's 161.7%
- PEG 0.81 vs DCOM's 1.87
- PEG 0.81 vs 1.64
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.0% NII/revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3% | |
| Value | PEG 0.81 vs 1.64 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.72 vs FFIC's 1.01 | |
| Dividends | 5.7% yield, vs JPM's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +50.3% vs NBTB's +18.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
MCB vs DCOM vs FFIC vs NBTB vs KRNY vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MCB vs DCOM vs FFIC vs NBTB vs KRNY vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories
KRNY leads 1 • MCB leads 0 • DCOM leads 0 • FFIC leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 815.2x KRNY's $344M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FFIC's 3.9%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $527M | $730M | $489M | $902M | $344M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $95M | $161M | $40M | $241M | $43M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $71M | $111M | $19M | $169M | $32M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $82M | $182M | $56M | $225M | $40M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.6% | +56.1% | +46.2% | +73.6% | +47.7% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.3% | +21.5% | +7.1% | +24.3% | +11.6% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.5% | +15.2% | +3.9% | +18.8% | +9.4% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.6% | +25.0% | +11.4% | +24.9% | +11.6% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +47.3% | +2.3% | +107.5% | +39.5% | +50.0% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 49% valuation discount to FFIC's 28.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs DCOM's 2.65x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $1.8B | $524M | $2.5B | $553M | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $694M | -$218M | $990M | $2.7B | $1.6B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.60x | 16.91x | 28.65x | 14.47x | 20.93x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.29x | 11.89x | 10.97x | 11.54x | 14.06x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.01x | 2.65x | — | 2.06x | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.84x | -1.39x | 24.85x | 11.03x | 45.76x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.91x | 2.42x | 1.16x | 2.90x | 1.61x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.40x | 1.17x | 0.75x | 1.29x | 0.74x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.21x | 9.68x | 9.39x | 11.49x | 25.84x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $3 for FFIC. MCB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DCOM scores 8/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.7% | +7.7% | +2.7% | +9.5% | +4.3% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +0.8% | +0.2% | +1.1% | +0.4% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.6% | +5.6% | +1.7% | +7.9% | +1.1% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | +6.1% | +0.7% | +2.4% | +1.5% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 0.25x | 0.84x | 0.17x | 1.68x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$362M | -$2.0B | $466M | $142M | $1.1B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $394M | $2.4B | $126M | $185M | $167M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $81M | $371M | $592M | $327M | $1.3B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.48x | 0.57x | 0.14x | 1.05x | 0.22x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — MCB and DCOM and JPM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,728 for KRNY. Over the past 12 months, DCOM leads with a +50.3% total return vs NBTB's +18.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MCB at 39.8% vs FFIC's 7.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.1% | +35.9% | +5.1% | +17.6% | +22.6% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +47.6% | +50.3% | +34.9% | +18.3% | +45.1% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.2% | +133.2% | +25.0% | +48.5% | +35.2% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.9% | +31.8% | -9.5% | +44.4% | -12.7% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +161.7% | +77.9% | +16.6% | +108.5% | -7.2% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.8% | +32.6% | +7.7% | +14.1% | +10.6% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
KRNY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KRNY is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FFIC's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KRNY currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs FFIC's 87.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.96x | 0.95x | 1.01x | 0.76x | 0.72x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $97.84 | $40.53 | $17.79 | $48.27 | $8.79 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $63.81 | $25.63 | $11.13 | $39.20 | $5.76 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.8% | +98.9% | +87.0% | +99.8% | +99.9% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.0 | 69.9 | 42.7 | 63.1 | 66.7 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 126K | 272K | 262K | 266K | 293K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FFIC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MCB as "Buy", DCOM as "Hold", FFIC as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", KRNY as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.3% upside for FFIC (target: $17) vs -4.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, FFIC offers the higher dividend yield at 5.68% vs MCB's 0.30%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $97.00 | $39.50 | $16.75 | $46.00 | $9.50 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | +2.5% | +5.7% | +3.0% | +5.0% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.29 | $1.00 | $0.88 | $1.43 | $0.44 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.3% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.4% | +0.1% | +3.9% |
JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). KRNY leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
MCB vs DCOM vs FFIC vs NBTB vs KRNY vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MCB or DCOM or FFIC or NBTB or KRNY or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(DCOM) is the stronger pick with 13. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (MCB) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MCB or DCOM or FFIC or NBTB or KRNY or JPM?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus Flushing Financial Corporation at 28. 6x. On forward P/E, Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. is actually cheaper at 9. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 87x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MCB or DCOM or FFIC or NBTB or KRNY or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -12. 7% for Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus KRNY's -7. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MCB or DCOM or FFIC or NBTB or KRNY or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kearny Financial Corp.
(KRNY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 72β versus Flushing Financial Corporation's 1. 01β — meaning FFIC is approximately 41% more volatile than KRNY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (MCB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MCB or DCOM or FFIC or NBTB or KRNY or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(DCOM) is pulling ahead at 13. 0% versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 330. 9% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MCB or DCOM or FFIC or NBTB or KRNY or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 4. 2% for Flushing Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 7. 6% for FFIC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MCB or DCOM or FFIC or NBTB or KRNY or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 87x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (MCB) trades at 9. 3x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 5. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIC: 8. 3% to $16. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — MCB or DCOM or FFIC or NBTB or KRNY or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Flushing Financial Corporation (FFIC) offers the highest yield at 5. 7%, versus 0. 3% for Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (MCB).
09Is MCB or DCOM or FFIC or NBTB or KRNY or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, MCB: +161. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MCB and DCOM and FFIC and NBTB and KRNY and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MCB is a small-cap deep-value stock; DCOM is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; KRNY is a small-cap income-oriented stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. DCOM, FFIC, NBTB, KRNY, JPM pay a dividend while MCB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.