MCFT
MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc.
Auto - Recreational Vehicles
Market Cap$393M
5Y Perf.+72.5%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
MCFT vs MGA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
MGA
Magna International Inc.
Auto - Parts
Market Cap$17.48B
5Y Perf.+45.2%
MCFT vs MGA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | MCFT | MGA |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Recreational Vehicles | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $393M | $17.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $296M | $42.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $16M | $829M |
| Gross Margin | 21.8% | 13.2% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | 6.0% |
| Forward P/E | 17.0x | 9.0x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $8.32B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $29M | $1.61B |
MCFT vs MGA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
MCFT
MGA
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MasterCraft Boat Ho… (MCFT) | 100 | 172.5 | +72.5% |
| Magna International… (MGA) | 100 | 145.2 | +45.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MCFT vs MGA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: MGA leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MCFT
MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
MCFT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 116.8% 10Y total return vs MGA's 91.9%
- 5.3% margin vs MGA's 2.0%
- 6.0% ROA vs MGA's 2.6%, ROIC 4.4% vs 8.6%
Best for: long-term compounding
MGA
Magna International Inc.
The Income Pick
MGA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 1.08, yield 3.1%
- Rev growth -0.2%, EPS growth -15.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.08, Low D/E 64.9%, current ratio 1.25x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MGA | -0.2% revenue growth vs MCFT's -22.5% |
| Value | MGA | Lower P/E (9.0x vs 17.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | MCFT | 5.3% margin vs MGA's 2.0% |
| Stability / Safety | MGA | Beta 1.08 vs MCFT's 1.25 |
| Dividends | MGA | 3.1% yield; 16-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | MGA | +94.7% vs MCFT's +53.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MCFT | 6.0% ROA vs MGA's 2.6%, ROIC 4.4% vs 8.6% |
MCFT vs MGA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
MCFT vs MGA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLMCFTLAGGINGMGA
MGAMagna International I…
2leads
MCFTMasterCraft Boat Hold…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs MGAMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
MCFT5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
MGA6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
MCFT6/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
MGA1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCFT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGA is the larger business by revenue, generating $42.2B annually — 142.4x MCFT's $296M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.3% (MCFT) to 2.0% (MGA). On growth, MCFT holds the edge at +13.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | MCFTMasterCraft Boat … | MGAMagna Internation… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $296M | $42.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | $4.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $16M | $829M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $26M | $2.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.8% | +13.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | +6.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.3% | +2.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.8% | +5.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.2% | +3.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.8% | -100.5% |
MCFT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
MGA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.0x trailing earnings, MGA trades at a 63% valuation discount to MCFT's 56.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MGA's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MCFT's 17.5x.
| Metric | MCFTMasterCraft Boat … | MGAMagna Internation… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $393M | $17.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $364M | $24.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 56.14x | 20.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.98x | 9.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 6.03x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.49x | 6.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.38x | 0.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.18x | 1.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.89x | 9.62x |
MGA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MCFT leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MCFT delivers a 8.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $7 for MGA. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MCFT scores 6/9 vs MGA's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | MCFTMasterCraft Boat … | MGAMagna Internation… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.4% | +6.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.0% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.4% | +8.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.2% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.65x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$29M | $6.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $29M | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $8.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 222.94x | 10.07x |
MCFT leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — MCFT and MGA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MCFT five years ago would be worth $8,116 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,492 for MGA. Over the past 12 months, MGA leads with a +94.7% total return vs MCFT's +53.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MGA at 7.8% vs MCFT's -6.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MCFTMasterCraft Boat … | MGAMagna Internation… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.7% | +15.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +53.0% | +94.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.9% | +25.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.8% | -25.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +116.8% | +91.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.0% | +7.8% |
Evenly matched — MCFT and MGA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MCFT and MGA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MGA is the less volatile stock with a 1.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MCFT's 1.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | MCFTMasterCraft Boat … | MGAMagna Internation… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.25x | 1.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.49 | $69.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.74 | $32.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.1% | +89.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.5 | 51.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 139K | 1.6M |
Evenly matched — MCFT and MGA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
MGA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MCFT as "Buy" and MGA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.6% upside for MGA (target: $66) vs 2.2% for MCFT (target: $25). MGA is the only dividend payer here at 3.13% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | MCFTMasterCraft Boat … | MGAMagna Internation… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.67 | $65.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.96 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.5% | +0.8% |
MGA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
MCFT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MGA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
Best OverallMasterCraft Boat Holdings, … (MCFT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
MCFT vs MGA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MCFT or MGA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Magna International Inc.
(MGA) is the stronger pick with -0. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 5% for MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. (MCFT). Magna International Inc. (MGA) offers the better valuation at 21. 0x trailing P/E (9. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. (MCFT) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MCFT or MGA?
On trailing P/E, Magna International Inc.
(MGA) is the cheapest at 21. 0x versus MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. at 56. 1x. On forward P/E, Magna International Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MCFT or MGA?
Over the past 5 years, MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc.
(MCFT) delivered a total return of -18. 8%, compared to -25. 1% for Magna International Inc. (MGA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MCFT returned +121. 5% versus MGA's +88. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MCFT or MGA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Magna International Inc.
(MGA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 08β versus MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 25β — meaning MCFT is approximately 16% more volatile than MGA relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — MCFT or MGA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Magna International Inc.
(MGA) is pulling ahead at -0. 2% versus -22. 5% for MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. (MCFT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. grew EPS -6. 5% year-over-year, compared to -15. 1% for Magna International Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MGA leads at 4. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MCFT or MGA?
MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc.
(MCFT) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 5% net margin versus 2. 0% for Magna International Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MGA leads at 5. 0% versus 4. 0% for MCFT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MCFT leads at 20. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MCFT or MGA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Magna International Inc.
(MGA) trades at 9. 0x forward P/E versus 17. 0x for MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. — 7. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MGA: 4. 6% to $65. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — MCFT or MGA?
In this comparison, MGA (3.
1% yield) pays a dividend. MCFT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MCFT or MGA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Magna International Inc.
(MGA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 08), 3. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MGA: +88. 0%, MCFT: +121. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MCFT and MGA?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MCFT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MGA is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. MGA pays a dividend while MCFT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(MCFT: 13.2% · MGA: 3.6%)P/E Ratio<
x
(MCFT: 56.1x · MGA: 21.0x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.