Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MDAI vs AEYE vs GMED vs ALKT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MDAI
Spectral AI, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$61M
5Y Perf.-76.9%
AEYE
AudioEye, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$100M
5Y Perf.-68.0%
GMED
Globus Medical, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$11.51B
5Y Perf.+18.5%
ALKT
Alkami Technology, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.87B
5Y Perf.-63.5%

MDAI vs AEYE vs GMED vs ALKT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MDAI logoMDAI
AEYE logoAEYE
GMED logoGMED
ALKT logoALKT
IndustryMedical - DevicesSoftware - ApplicationMedical - DevicesSoftware - Application
Market Cap$61M$100M$11.51B$1.87B
Revenue (TTM)$23M$40M$3.10B$472M
Net Income (TTM)$-16M$-3M$587M$-50M
Gross Margin45.0%78.3%50.9%57.4%
Operating Margin-32.2%-7.9%17.2%-9.3%
Forward P/E19.0x21.7x
Total Debt$5M$721K$119M$354M
Cash & Equiv.$5M$5M$526M$63M

MDAI vs AEYE vs GMED vs ALKTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MDAI
AEYE
GMED
ALKT
StockApr 21May 26Return
Spectral AI, Inc. (MDAI)10023.1-76.9%
AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE)10032.0-68.0%
Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED)100118.5+18.5%
Alkami Technology, … (ALKT)10036.5-63.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MDAI vs AEYE vs GMED vs ALKT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: GMED leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Spectral AI, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
MDAI
Spectral AI, Inc.
The Growth Play

MDAI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 63.8%, EPS growth 42.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.7%
  • 63.8% revenue growth vs AEYE's 14.5%
  • +94.0% vs ALKT's -37.8%
Best for: growth exposure
AEYE
AudioEye, Inc.
The Income Pick

AEYE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.29
Best for: income & stability
GMED
Globus Medical, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

GMED carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 264.4% 10Y total return vs AEYE's 102.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.29, Low D/E 2.6%, current ratio 4.26x
  • Beta 1.29, current ratio 4.26x
  • Lower P/E (19.0x vs 21.7x)
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
ALKT
Alkami Technology, Inc.
The Growth Angle

ALKT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMDAI logoMDAI63.8% revenue growth vs AEYE's 14.5%
ValueGMED logoGMEDLower P/E (19.0x vs 21.7x)
Quality / MarginsGMED logoGMED18.9% margin vs MDAI's -70.6%
Stability / SafetyGMED logoGMEDBeta 1.29 vs AEYE's 2.29, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)MDAI logoMDAI+94.0% vs ALKT's -37.8%
Efficiency (ROA)GMED logoGMED11.3% ROA vs MDAI's -102.1%

MDAI vs AEYE vs GMED vs ALKT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MDAISpectral AI, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

AEYEAudioEye, Inc.
FY 2024
Enterprise
100.0%$15M
GMEDGlobus Medical, Inc.
FY 2024
Spine
93.9%$2.4B
Emerging Technology
6.1%$154M
ALKTAlkami Technology, Inc.
FY 2025
SaaS Subscription Services
95.0%$422M
Implementation Services
2.8%$13M
Service, Other
2.1%$9M

MDAI vs AEYE vs GMED vs ALKT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLGMEDLAGGINGALKT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

GMED leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

GMED is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 133.8x MDAI's $23M. GMED is the more profitable business, keeping 18.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MDAI's -70.6%. On growth, ALKT holds the edge at +28.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMDAI logoMDAISpectral AI, Inc.AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.GMED logoGMEDGlobus Medical, I…ALKT logoALKTAlkami Technology…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$23M$40M$3.1B$472M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$7M-$504,000$745M-$12M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$16M-$3M$587M-$50M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$4M$2M$605M$44M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+45.0%+78.3%+50.9%+57.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-32.2%-7.9%+17.2%-9.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-70.6%-7.6%+18.9%-10.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-19.0%+5.5%+19.5%+9.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-53.6%+7.9%+27.0%+28.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-54.4%+29.0%+66.7%-22.7%
GMED leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

GMED leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
MetricMDAI logoMDAISpectral AI, Inc.AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.GMED logoGMEDGlobus Medical, I…ALKT logoALKTAlkami Technology…
Market CapShares × price$61M$100M$11.5B$1.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$61M$96M$11.1B$2.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-2.65x-32.36x21.70x-37.89x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.19.03x21.69x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.70x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.51x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.07x2.49x3.92x4.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share20.91x2.55x5.00x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF19.54x45.09x
GMED leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

GMED leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

GMED delivers a 13.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-48 for AEYE. GMED carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALKT's 0.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GMED scores 9/9 vs ALKT's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricMDAI logoMDAISpectral AI, Inc.AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.GMED logoGMEDGlobus Medical, I…ALKT logoALKTAlkami Technology…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-47.8%+13.0%-14.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-102.1%-9.5%+11.3%-5.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital-42.4%+8.9%-8.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-17.7%+10.4%-9.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94493
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.15x0.03x0.98x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$467,000-$5M-$408M$290M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$5M$5M$526M$63M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5M$721,000$119M$354M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-6.68x-2.79x81.13x-3.73x
GMED leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

GMED leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in GMED five years ago would be worth $11,607 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,308 for MDAI. Over the past 12 months, MDAI leads with a +94.0% total return vs ALKT's -37.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GMED at 13.5% vs MDAI's -39.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMDAI logoMDAISpectral AI, Inc.AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.GMED logoGMEDGlobus Medical, I…ALKT logoALKTAlkami Technology…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+55.2%-18.7%-2.5%-23.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+94.0%-27.9%+19.0%-37.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-78.2%+20.6%+46.3%+41.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-76.9%-60.2%+16.1%-54.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-76.8%+102.2%+264.4%-59.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-39.8%+6.4%+13.5%+12.2%
GMED leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

GMED leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

GMED is the less volatile stock with a 1.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AEYE's 2.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GMED currently trades 83.9% from its 52-week high vs AEYE's 49.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMDAI logoMDAISpectral AI, Inc.AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.GMED logoGMEDGlobus Medical, I…ALKT logoALKTAlkami Technology…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.59x2.29x1.29x1.30x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.21$16.39$101.40$31.66
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.13$5.31$51.79$14.11
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+70.1%+49.4%+83.9%+55.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10070.961.345.050.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded620K194K998K1.9M
GMED leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: GMED as "Buy", ALKT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.1% upside for GMED (target: $111) vs 26.2% for ALKT (target: $22).

MetricMDAI logoMDAISpectral AI, Inc.AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.GMED logoGMEDGlobus Medical, I…ALKT logoALKTAlkami Technology…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$110.67$22.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts3612
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises11
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+2.6%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

GMED leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.

Best OverallGlobus Medical, Inc. (GMED)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MDAI vs AEYE vs GMED vs ALKT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MDAI or AEYE or GMED or ALKT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Spectral AI, Inc.

(MDAI) is the stronger pick with 63. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 14. 5% for AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE). Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED) offers the better valuation at 21. 7x trailing P/E (19. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MDAI or AEYE or GMED or ALKT?

On forward P/E, Globus Medical, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 19. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MDAI or AEYE or GMED or ALKT?

Over the past 5 years, Globus Medical, Inc.

(GMED) delivered a total return of +16. 1%, compared to -76. 9% for Spectral AI, Inc. (MDAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GMED returned +264. 4% versus MDAI's -76. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MDAI or AEYE or GMED or ALKT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Globus Medical, Inc.

(GMED) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 29β versus AudioEye, Inc. 's 2. 29β — meaning AEYE is approximately 78% more volatile than GMED relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 98% for Alkami Technology, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MDAI or AEYE or GMED or ALKT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Spectral AI, Inc.

(MDAI) is pulling ahead at 63. 8% versus 14. 5% for AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Globus Medical, Inc. grew EPS 422. 7% year-over-year, compared to -12. 2% for Alkami Technology, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GMED leads at 42. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MDAI or AEYE or GMED or ALKT?

Globus Medical, Inc.

(GMED) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 3% net margin versus -51. 8% for Spectral AI, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GMED leads at 16. 3% versus -22. 3% for MDAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AEYE leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MDAI or AEYE or GMED or ALKT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Globus Medical, Inc.

(GMED) trades at 19. 0x forward P/E versus 21. 7x for Alkami Technology, Inc. — 2. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GMED: 30. 1% to $110. 67.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MDAI or AEYE or GMED or ALKT?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is MDAI or AEYE or GMED or ALKT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Globus Medical, Inc.

(GMED) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 29), +264. 4% 10Y return). AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) carries a higher beta of 2. 29 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GMED: +264. 4%, AEYE: +102. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MDAI and AEYE and GMED and ALKT?

These companies operate in different sectors (MDAI (Healthcare) and AEYE (Technology) and GMED (Healthcare) and ALKT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MDAI is a small-cap high-growth stock; AEYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GMED is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ALKT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MDAI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 27%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AEYE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 46%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GMED

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ALKT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Gross Margin > 34%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MDAI and AEYE and GMED and ALKT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MDAI: -53.6% · AEYE: 7.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.