Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare MongoDB, Inc. (MDB) vs Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MDB | 19.2% revenue growth vs MSFT's 14.9% |
| Value | MSFT | Lower P/E (23.8x vs 68.2x) |
| Quality / Margins | MSFT | 39.0% net margin vs MDB's -3.1% |
| Stability / Safety | MSFT | Beta 0.88 vs MDB's 1.68 |
| Dividends | MSFT | 0.8% yield; 19-year raise streak; MDB pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | MDB | +22.8% vs MSFT's -0.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MSFT | 17.9% ROA vs MDB's -2.0%, ROIC 27.9% vs -8.6% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
MongoDB is a modern database platform company that offers a flexible, document-based database system as an alternative to traditional relational databases. It generates revenue primarily through its cloud-based MongoDB Atlas service — which accounts for over 60% of total revenue — along with its on-premise Enterprise Advanced licenses and professional services. The company's key advantage is its developer-friendly document model that enables faster application development and its first-mover position in the NoSQL database market.
Microsoft is a global technology company that develops software, cloud services, and hardware products. It generates revenue primarily through cloud services like Azure (~40% of revenue), productivity software including Office 365 and Dynamics, and personal computing through Windows licensing and Surface devices. Its key competitive advantage is the deeply entrenched enterprise ecosystem—Windows and Office dominance creates a powerful network effect that drives adoption of its cloud and productivity suites.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
MSFT leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
MSFT is the larger business by revenue, generating $305.5B annually — 131.8x MDB's $2.3B. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MDB's -3.1%.
| Metric | MDBMongoDB, Inc. | MSFTMicrosoft Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.3B | $305.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$121M | $184.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$71M | $119.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $355M | $77.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.6% | +68.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.7% | +46.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.1% | +39.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +25.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.7% | +16.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +81.0% | +59.8% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | MDBMongoDB, Inc. | MSFTMicrosoft Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $26.7B | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $26.3B | $2.95T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -189.87x | 28.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 68.24x | 23.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.53x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 18.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 13.32x | 10.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.80x | 8.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 221.51x | 40.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MSFT delivers a 30.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-2 for MDB. MDB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MSFT's 0.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MSFT scores 6/9 vs MDB's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | MDBMongoDB, Inc. | MSFTMicrosoft Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.5% | +30.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.0% | +17.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.6% | +27.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.4% | +29.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$454M | $30.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $490M | $30.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $37M | $60.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.95x | 56.44x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in MSFT five years ago would be worth $17,186 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,315 for MDB. Over the past 12 months, MDB leads with a +22.8% total return vs MSFT's -0.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MSFT at 17.3% vs MDB's 16.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MDBMongoDB, Inc. | MSFTMicrosoft Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.8% | -16.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.8% | -0.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.8% | +61.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.9% | +71.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +924.2% | +718.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.2% | +17.3% |
Risk & Volatility
MSFT is the less volatile stock with a 0.88 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MDB's 1.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MDB currently trades 73.9% from its 52-week high vs MSFT's 70.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | MDBMongoDB, Inc. | MSFTMicrosoft Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.68x | 0.88x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $444.72 | $555.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $140.78 | $344.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.9% | +70.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.7 | 39.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 28.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MDB as "Buy" and MSFT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 48.6% upside for MSFT (target: $584) vs 33.1% for MDB (target: $437). MSFT is the only dividend payer here at 0.82% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | MDBMongoDB, Inc. | MSFTMicrosoft Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $437.20 | $583.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 44 | 78 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 19 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| MongoDB, Inc. (MDB) | 100 | 239.45 | +139.5% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 245.02 | +145.0% |
Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) returned +72% over 5 years vs MongoDB, Inc. (MDB)'s -17%. A $10,000 investment in MSFT 5 years ago would be worth $17,186 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| MongoDB, Inc. (MDB) | $65M | $2.0B | +2974.0% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | $91.2B | $281.7B | +209.1% |
MongoDB, Inc.'s revenue grew from $65M (2016) to $2.0B (2025) — a 46.3% CAGR. Microsoft Corporation's revenue grew from $91.2B (2016) to $281.7B (2025) — a 13.4% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| MongoDB, Inc. (MDB) | -112.6% | -6.4% | +94.3% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 22.5% | 36.1% | +60.4% |
MongoDB, Inc.'s net margin went from -113% (2016) to -6% (2025). Microsoft Corporation's net margin went from 23% (2016) to 36% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 26.3 | 35.5 | +35.0% |
Microsoft Corporation has traded in a 25x–48x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~29x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| MongoDB, Inc. (MDB) | -6.34 | -1.73 | +72.7% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 2.1 | 13.64 | +549.5% |
MongoDB, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-6.34 (2016) to $-1.73 (2025). Microsoft Corporation's EPS grew from $2.10 (2016) to $13.64 (2025) — a 23% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
MongoDB, Inc. generated $121M FCF in 2025 (+322% vs 2021). Microsoft Corporation generated $72B FCF in 2025 (+28% vs 2021).
MDB vs MSFT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MDB or MSFT a better buy right now?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) offers the better valuation at 28.8x trailing P/E (23.8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MongoDB, Inc. (MDB) a "Buy" — based on 44 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MDB or MSFT?
On forward P/E, Microsoft Corporation is actually cheaper at 23.8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MDB or MSFT?
Over the past 5 years, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) delivered a total return of +71.9%, compared to -16.9% for MongoDB, Inc. (MDB). A $10,000 investment in MSFT five years ago would be worth approximately $17K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MDB returned +924.2% versus MSFT's +718.2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MDB or MSFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.88β versus MongoDB, Inc.'s 1.68β — meaning MDB is approximately 90% more volatile than MSFT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MongoDB, Inc. (MDB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 18% for Microsoft Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — MDB or MSFT?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.1% net margin versus -6.4% for MongoDB, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36.1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45.6% versus -10.8% for MDB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MDB leads at 73.3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is MDB or MSFT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) trades at 23.8x forward P/E versus 68.2x for MongoDB, Inc. — 44.4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MSFT: 48.6% to $583.67.
07Which pays a better dividend — MDB or MSFT?
In this comparison, MSFT (0.8% yield) pays a dividend. MDB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is MDB or MSFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.88), 0.8% yield, +718.2% 10Y return). MongoDB, Inc. (MDB) carries a higher beta of 1.68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +718.2%, MDB: +924.2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MDB and MSFT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. MSFT pays a dividend while MDB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.