Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MDGL vs AKRO vs HALO vs ELVN vs ABBV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
MDGL vs AKRO vs HALO vs ELVN vs ABBV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $12.27B | $4.50B | $7.68B | $2.39B | $358.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.13B | $0.00 | $1.40B | $0.00 | $61.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-309M | $-293M | $317M | $-104M | $4.23B |
| Gross Margin | 93.1% | — | 81.9% | — | 70.2% |
| Operating Margin | -27.7% | — | 58.4% | — | 26.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 8.1x | — | 14.3x |
| Total Debt | $354M | $36M | $0.00 | $0.00 | $69.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $199M | $340M | $134M | $99M | $5.23B |
MDGL vs AKRO vs HALO vs ELVN vs ABBV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Madrigal Pharmaceut… (MDGL) | 100 | 461.0 | +361.0% |
| Akero Therapeutics,… (AKRO) | 100 | 213.8 | +113.8% |
| Halozyme Therapeuti… (HALO) | 100 | 268.6 | +168.6% |
| Enliven Therapeutic… (ELVN) | 100 | 30.1 | -69.9% |
| AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) | 100 | 218.7 | +118.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MDGL vs AKRO vs HALO vs ELVN vs ABBV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MDGL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 432.1%, EPS growth 41.3%
- 39.2% 10Y total return vs ABBV's 295.5%
- 432.1% revenue growth vs AKRO's -24.6%
AKRO is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 4.9%, current ratio 19.38x
- Beta 0.35, current ratio 19.38x
HALO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (8.1x vs 14.3x)
- 22.7% margin vs MDGL's -27.3%
- 12.5% ROA vs AKRO's -29.1%, ROIC 73.4% vs -55.3%
ELVN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +120.5% vs HALO's -7.1%
ABBV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.34, yield 3.2%
- Beta 0.34 vs ELVN's 1.27
- 3.2% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 432.1% revenue growth vs AKRO's -24.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 14.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.7% margin vs MDGL's -27.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs ELVN's 1.27 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +120.5% vs HALO's -7.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.5% ROA vs AKRO's -29.1%, ROIC 73.4% vs -55.3% |
MDGL vs AKRO vs HALO vs ELVN vs ABBV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MDGL vs AKRO vs HALO vs ELVN vs ABBV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HALO leads in 3 of 6 categories
ABBV leads 1 • MDGL leads 0 • AKRO leads 0 • ELVN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV and ELVN operate at a comparable scale, with $61.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. HALO is the more profitable business, keeping 22.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MDGL's -27.3%. On growth, MDGL holds the edge at +126.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $0 | $1.4B | $0 | $61.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$312M | -$318M | $945M | -$119M | $24.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$309M | -$293M | $317M | -$104M | $4.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$272M | -$250M | $645M | -$70M | $18.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +93.1% | — | +81.9% | — | +70.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -27.7% | — | +58.4% | — | +26.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -27.3% | — | +22.7% | — | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -24.1% | — | +46.2% | — | +30.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +126.8% | — | +51.6% | — | +10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +5.7% | -2.1% | +2.2% | +57.4% |
Valuation Metrics
HALO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.5x trailing earnings, HALO trades at a 70% valuation discount to ABBV's 85.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HALO's 8.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ABBV's 15.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.3B | $4.5B | $7.7B | $2.4B | $358.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.4B | $4.2B | $7.5B | $2.3B | $422.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -41.62x | -14.57x | 25.46x | -22.02x | 85.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 8.09x | — | 14.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.11x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 8.34x | — | 14.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 12.80x | — | 5.50x | — | 5.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 19.91x | 4.89x | 165.47x | 4.97x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 11.91x | — | 20.12x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HALO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-50 for MDGL. AKRO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MDGL's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ABBV scores 6/9 vs AKRO's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -50.2% | -30.6% | +6.5% | -24.2% | +62.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -25.4% | -29.1% | +12.5% | -23.4% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -29.4% | -55.3% | +73.4% | -32.8% | +23.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -32.9% | -42.4% | +38.2% | -31.1% | +21.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | 0.05x | — | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $156M | -$304M | -$134M | -$99M | $63.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $199M | $340M | $134M | $99M | $5.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $354M | $36M | $0 | $0 | $69.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -17.51x | -62.41x | 46.08x | — | 3.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — MDGL and HALO and ELVN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MDGL five years ago would be worth $41,011 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,704 for HALO. Over the past 12 months, ELVN leads with a +120.5% total return vs HALO's -7.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HALO at 29.1% vs AKRO's 6.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.9% | — | -7.3% | +159.3% | -10.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +79.0% | +27.7% | -7.1% | +120.5% | +11.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.2% | +20.1% | +115.3% | +110.5% | +50.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +310.1% | +100.0% | +37.0% | +38.9% | +101.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3921.5% | +198.3% | +570.7% | -32.9% | +295.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.1% | +6.3% | +29.1% | +28.2% | +14.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AKRO and ABBV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABBV is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ELVN's 1.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AKRO currently trades 95.3% from its 52-week high vs HALO's 79.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.57x | 0.35x | 0.56x | 1.27x | 0.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $615.00 | $57.35 | $82.22 | $48.50 | $244.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $265.00 | $37.28 | $47.50 | $14.79 | $176.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.0% | +95.3% | +79.3% | +83.1% | +82.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.2 | 70.4 | 52.4 | 49.7 | 46.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 310K | 0 | 1.4M | 1.1M | 5.8M |
Analyst Outlook
ABBV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MDGL as "Buy", AKRO as "Buy", HALO as "Buy", ELVN as "Buy", ABBV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.9% upside for MDGL (target: $706) vs -11.4% for AKRO (target: $48). ABBV is the only dividend payer here at 3.24% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $705.67 | $48.40 | $78.33 | $43.33 | $256.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 14 | 27 | 6 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $6.57 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.5% | +0.0% | +0.3% |
HALO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ABBV leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
MDGL vs AKRO vs HALO vs ELVN vs ABBV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MDGL or AKRO or HALO or ELVN or ABBV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) is the stronger pick with 432. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 6% for AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO) offers the better valuation at 25. 5x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (MDGL) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MDGL or AKRO or HALO or ELVN or ABBV?
On trailing P/E, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is the cheapest at 25. 5x versus AbbVie Inc. at 85. 5x. On forward P/E, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MDGL or AKRO or HALO or ELVN or ABBV?
Over the past 5 years, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) delivered a total return of +310. 1%, compared to +37. 0% for Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MDGL returned +39. 2% versus ELVN's -32. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MDGL or AKRO or HALO or ELVN or ABBV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus Enliven Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 27β — meaning ELVN is approximately 276% more volatile than ABBV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Akero Therapeutics, Inc. (AKRO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 59% for Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MDGL or AKRO or HALO or ELVN or ABBV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) is pulling ahead at 432. 1% versus 8. 6% for AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 41. 3% year-over-year, compared to -29. 8% for Akero Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HALO leads at 28. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MDGL or AKRO or HALO or ELVN or ABBV?
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 7% net margin versus -30. 1% for Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HALO leads at 58. 4% versus -31. 3% for MDGL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MDGL leads at 94. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MDGL or AKRO or HALO or ELVN or ABBV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 14. 3x for AbbVie Inc. — 6. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MDGL: 31. 9% to $705. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — MDGL or AKRO or HALO or ELVN or ABBV?
In this comparison, ABBV (3.
2% yield) pays a dividend. MDGL, AKRO, HALO, ELVN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MDGL or AKRO or HALO or ELVN or ABBV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34), 3. 2% yield, +295. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +295. 5%, ELVN: -32. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MDGL and AKRO and HALO and ELVN and ABBV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MDGL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AKRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HALO is a small-cap high-growth stock; ELVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ABBV is a large-cap income-oriented stock. ABBV pays a dividend while MDGL, AKRO, HALO, ELVN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.