Broadcasting
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MDIA vs GTN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Broadcasting
MDIA vs GTN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Broadcasting | Broadcasting |
| Market Cap | $55M | $412M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $127M | $3.08B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-41M | $-76M |
| Gross Margin | -3.6% | 115.0% |
| Operating Margin | -12.6% | 12.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 1.8x |
| Total Debt | $153M | $5.81B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $368M |
MDIA vs GTN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MediaCo Holding Inc. (MDIA) | 100 | 21.7 | -78.3% |
| Gray Media, Inc. (GTN) | 100 | 31.8 | -68.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MDIA vs GTN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MDIA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.18
- Rev growth 195.1%, EPS growth 79.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.18, current ratio 0.64x
GTN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -50.5% 10Y total return vs MDIA's -52.0%
- -2.5% margin vs MDIA's -32.4%
- 7.7% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 195.1% revenue growth vs GTN's -15.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | -2.5% margin vs MDIA's -32.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.18 vs GTN's 1.54, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.7% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +27.7% vs MDIA's -1.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.7% ROA vs MDIA's -12.9%, ROIC 3.5% vs -13.5% |
MDIA vs GTN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MDIA vs GTN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GTN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GTN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 24.2x MDIA's $127M. GTN is the more profitable business, keeping -2.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MDIA's -32.4%. On growth, MDIA holds the edge at +18.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $127M | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$28M | $932M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$41M | -$76M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12M | -$74M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | +115.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -12.6% | +12.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -32.4% | -2.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.5% | -2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.6% | -1.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -133.3% | +98.5% |
Valuation Metrics
GTN leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $55M | $412M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $203M | $5.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -11.18x | -5.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 1.81x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.58x | 0.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.67x | 0.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 2.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GTN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GTN delivers a -2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-48 for MDIA. MDIA carries lower financial leverage with a 1.85x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GTN's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GTN scores 4/9 vs MDIA's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -47.7% | -2.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.9% | -0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.5% | +3.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -14.7% | +3.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.85x | 2.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $148M | $5.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $368M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $153M | $5.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.29x | 1.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MDIA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MDIA five years ago would be worth $3,221 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,729 for GTN. Over the past 12 months, GTN leads with a +27.7% total return vs MDIA's -1.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MDIA at -8.4% vs GTN's -9.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +58.0% | -6.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -1.7% | +27.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -23.2% | -26.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.8% | -72.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.0% | -50.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.4% | -9.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MDIA and GTN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MDIA is the less volatile stock with a 0.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GTN's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTN currently trades 68.9% from its 52-week high vs MDIA's 57.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.18x | 1.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.60 | $6.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.54 | $3.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.6% | +68.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.4 | 52.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 30K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
GTN is the only dividend payer here at 7.68% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +7.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.34 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% |
GTN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MDIA leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
MDIA vs GTN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MDIA or GTN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MediaCo Holding Inc.
(MDIA) is the stronger pick with 195. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 1% for Gray Media, Inc. (GTN). Analysts rate Gray Media, Inc. (GTN) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MDIA or GTN?
Over the past 5 years, MediaCo Holding Inc.
(MDIA) delivered a total return of -67. 8%, compared to -72. 7% for Gray Media, Inc. (GTN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GTN returned -50. 5% versus MDIA's -52. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MDIA or GTN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MediaCo Holding Inc.
(MDIA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 18β versus Gray Media, Inc. 's 1. 54β — meaning GTN is approximately 754% more volatile than MDIA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MediaCo Holding Inc. (MDIA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 185% versus 2% for Gray Media, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MDIA or GTN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MediaCo Holding Inc.
(MDIA) is pulling ahead at 195. 1% versus -15. 1% for Gray Media, Inc. (GTN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MediaCo Holding Inc. grew EPS 79. 4% year-over-year, compared to -126. 2% for Gray Media, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MDIA leads at 31. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MDIA or GTN?
Gray Media, Inc.
(GTN) is the more profitable company, earning -2. 7% net margin versus -4. 3% for MediaCo Holding Inc. — meaning it keeps -2. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GTN leads at 12. 7% versus -29. 5% for MDIA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GTN leads at 96. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MDIA or GTN?
In this comparison, GTN (7.
7% yield) pays a dividend. MDIA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is MDIA or GTN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MediaCo Holding Inc.
(MDIA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 18)). Gray Media, Inc. (GTN) carries a higher beta of 1. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MDIA: -52. 0%, GTN: -50. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MDIA and GTN?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MDIA is a small-cap high-growth stock; GTN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. GTN pays a dividend while MDIA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 68%
- Dividend Yield > 3.0%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.