Broadcasting
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MDIA vs SSB vs HBAN vs IHRT vs CMLS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Broadcasting
Broadcasting
MDIA vs SSB vs HBAN vs IHRT vs CMLS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Broadcasting | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Broadcasting | Broadcasting |
| Market Cap | $55M | $9.79B | $25.63B | $880M | $87K |
| Revenue (TTM) | $127M | $3.76B | $12.48B | $3.86B | $772M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-41M | $799M | $2.21B | $-473M | $-297M |
| Gross Margin | -3.6% | 68.3% | 61.7% | 78.5% | 62.7% |
| Operating Margin | -12.6% | 27.9% | 21.5% | -0.5% | -31.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.2x | 11.1x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $153M | $1.31B | $18.48B | $5.79B | $795M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $583M | $1.78B | $271K | $64M |
MDIA vs SSB vs HBAN vs IHRT vs CMLS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MediaCo Holding Inc. (MDIA) | 100 | 22.5 | -77.5% |
| SouthState Corporat… (SSB) | 100 | 183.1 | +83.1% |
| Huntington Bancshar… (HBAN) | 100 | 181.3 | +81.3% |
| iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT) | 100 | 65.3 | -34.7% |
| Cumulus Media Inc. (CMLS) | 100 | 1.5 | -98.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MDIA vs SSB vs HBAN vs IHRT vs CMLS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MDIA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 195.1%, EPS growth 79.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.18, current ratio 0.64x
- 195.1% revenue growth vs CMLS's -2.1%
- Beta 0.18 vs CMLS's 1.87, lower leverage
SSB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 1.02, yield 2.4%
- PEG 0.35 vs HBAN's 0.74
- Beta 1.02, yield 2.4%, current ratio 0.22x
- NIM 3.4% vs HBAN's 2.7%
HBAN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 121.5% 10Y total return vs SSB's 67.9%
IHRT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +415.5% vs CMLS's -96.2%
Among these 5 stocks, CMLS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 195.1% revenue growth vs CMLS's -2.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.3% margin vs CMLS's -38.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.18 vs CMLS's 1.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs HBAN's 3.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +415.5% vs CMLS's -96.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.2% ROA vs CMLS's -27.1%, ROIC 9.2% vs -20.5% |
MDIA vs SSB vs HBAN vs IHRT vs CMLS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MDIA vs SSB vs HBAN vs IHRT vs CMLS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SSB leads in 3 of 6 categories
IHRT leads 1 • MDIA leads 0 • HBAN leads 0 • CMLS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SSB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HBAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.5B annually — 97.9x MDIA's $127M. SSB is the more profitable business, keeping 21.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMLS's -38.4%. On growth, MDIA holds the edge at +18.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $127M | $3.8B | $12.5B | $3.9B | $772M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$28M | $1.2B | $3.1B | $339M | -$185M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$41M | $799M | $2.2B | -$473M | -$297M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12M | $154M | $2.3B | $11M | -$10M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | +68.3% | +61.7% | +78.5% | +62.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -12.6% | +27.9% | +21.5% | -0.5% | -31.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -32.4% | +21.3% | +17.7% | -12.2% | -38.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.5% | -14.4% | +18.2% | +0.3% | -1.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.6% | — | — | +0.8% | -11.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -133.3% | +30.9% | -11.8% | -20.8% | -91.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SSB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.6x trailing earnings, HBAN trades at a 6% valuation discount to SSB's 12.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SSB offers better value at 0.43x vs HBAN's 0.77x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $55M | $9.8B | $25.6B | $880M | $87,200 |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $203M | $10.5B | $42.3B | $6.7B | $731M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -11.18x | 12.39x | 11.65x | -1.86x | -0.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.18x | 11.07x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.43x | 0.77x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.98x | 15.75x | 19.65x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.58x | 2.61x | 2.05x | 0.23x | 0.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.67x | 1.08x | 1.00x | — | 0.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 11.25x | 80.64x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SSB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HBAN delivers a 10.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-193 for CMLS. SSB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMLS's 114.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HBAN scores 6/9 vs MDIA's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -47.7% | +9.0% | +10.0% | — | -193.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.9% | +1.2% | +1.0% | -12.0% | -27.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.5% | +9.2% | +5.1% | -0.4% | -20.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -14.7% | +4.8% | +4.5% | -0.5% | -21.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.85x | 0.15x | 0.76x | — | 114.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $148M | $731M | $16.7B | $5.8B | $731M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $583M | $1.8B | $270,900 | $64M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $153M | $1.3B | $18.5B | $5.8B | $795M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.29x | 0.97x | 0.62x | -0.17x | -0.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IHRT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HBAN five years ago would be worth $12,203 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5 for CMLS. Over the past 12 months, IHRT leads with a +415.5% total return vs CMLS's -96.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IHRT at 23.0% vs CMLS's -87.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +58.0% | +4.0% | -6.5% | +36.6% | -93.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -1.7% | +14.3% | +12.4% | +415.5% | -96.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -23.2% | +62.3% | +85.1% | +85.9% | -99.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.8% | +20.3% | +22.0% | -75.0% | -100.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.0% | +67.9% | +121.5% | -68.5% | -100.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.4% | +17.5% | +22.8% | +23.0% | -87.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MDIA and SSB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MDIA is the less volatile stock with a 0.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMLS's 1.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SSB currently trades 89.8% from its 52-week high vs CMLS's 2.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.23x | 1.01x | 1.08x | 1.77x | 1.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.60 | $108.46 | $19.46 | $6.56 | $0.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.54 | $84.48 | $14.87 | $1.08 | $0.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.6% | +89.8% | +83.2% | +86.4% | +2.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.4 | 55.7 | 53.4 | 68.6 | 25.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 30K | 841K | 24.3M | 986K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SSB and HBAN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SSB as "Buy", HBAN as "Buy", IHRT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.9% upside for HBAN (target: $20) vs -38.3% for IHRT (target: $4). For income investors, HBAN offers the higher dividend yield at 3.73% vs IHRT's 0.19%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $118.20 | $20.38 | $3.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 20 | 48 | 10 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.4% | +3.7% | +0.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.30 | $0.60 | $0.01 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +2.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +100.0% |
SSB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). IHRT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
MDIA vs SSB vs HBAN vs IHRT vs CMLS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MDIA or SSB or HBAN or IHRT or CMLS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MediaCo Holding Inc.
(MDIA) is the stronger pick with 195. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 1% for Cumulus Media Inc. (CMLS). Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN) offers the better valuation at 11. 6x trailing P/E (11. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SouthState Corporation (SSB) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MDIA or SSB or HBAN or IHRT or CMLS?
On trailing P/E, Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN) is the cheapest at 11.
6x versus SouthState Corporation at 12. 4x. On forward P/E, SouthState Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: SouthState Corporation wins at 0. 35x versus Huntington Bancshares Incorporated's 0. 74x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MDIA or SSB or HBAN or IHRT or CMLS?
Over the past 5 years, Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN) delivered a total return of +22.
0%, compared to -100. 0% for Cumulus Media Inc. (CMLS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HBAN returned +120. 7% versus CMLS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MDIA or SSB or HBAN or IHRT or CMLS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MediaCo Holding Inc.
(MDIA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 23β versus Cumulus Media Inc. 's 1. 84β — meaning CMLS is approximately 708% more volatile than MDIA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SouthState Corporation (SSB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 114% for Cumulus Media Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MDIA or SSB or HBAN or IHRT or CMLS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MediaCo Holding Inc.
(MDIA) is pulling ahead at 195. 1% versus -2. 1% for Cumulus Media Inc. (CMLS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MediaCo Holding Inc. grew EPS 79. 4% year-over-year, compared to -145. 8% for Cumulus Media Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MDIA leads at 31. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MDIA or SSB or HBAN or IHRT or CMLS?
SouthState Corporation (SSB) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
3% net margin versus -34. 2% for Cumulus Media Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SSB leads at 27. 9% versus -29. 5% for MDIA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IHRT leads at 78. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MDIA or SSB or HBAN or IHRT or CMLS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, SouthState Corporation (SSB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus Huntington Bancshares Incorporated's 0. 74x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, SouthState Corporation (SSB) trades at 10. 2x forward P/E versus 11. 1x for Huntington Bancshares Incorporated — 0. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HBAN: 25. 9% to $20. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — MDIA or SSB or HBAN or IHRT or CMLS?
In this comparison, HBAN (3.
7% yield), SSB (2. 4% yield), IHRT (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. MDIA, CMLS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MDIA or SSB or HBAN or IHRT or CMLS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MediaCo Holding Inc.
(MDIA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 23)). Cumulus Media Inc. (CMLS) carries a higher beta of 1. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MDIA: -50. 2%, CMLS: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MDIA and SSB and HBAN and IHRT and CMLS?
These companies operate in different sectors (MDIA (Communication Services) and SSB (Financial Services) and HBAN (Financial Services) and IHRT (Communication Services) and CMLS (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MDIA is a small-cap high-growth stock; SSB is a small-cap high-growth stock; HBAN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; IHRT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CMLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SSB, HBAN pay a dividend while MDIA, IHRT, CMLS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.