REIT - Diversified
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MDRR vs PSTV vs GOOD vs NRXP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
REIT - Diversified
Biotechnology
MDRR vs PSTV vs GOOD vs NRXP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Diversified | Biotechnology | REIT - Diversified | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $12M | $14M | $616M | $85M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $5M | $166M | $242K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $-22M | $21M | $-38M |
| Gross Margin | — | 91.5% | -11.7% | 59.5% |
| Operating Margin | 5.3% | -293.5% | 27.9% | -63.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 83.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $785K | $821K | $856M | $631K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $9M | $11M | $8M |
MDRR vs PSTV vs GOOD vs NRXP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medalist Diversifie… (MDRR) | 100 | 37.9 | -62.1% |
| Plus Therapeutics, … (PSTV) | 100 | 1.0 | -99.0% |
| Gladstone Commercia… (GOOD) | 100 | 71.0 | -29.0% |
| NRx Pharmaceuticals… (NRXP) | 100 | 2.8 | -97.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MDRR vs PSTV vs GOOD vs NRXP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MDRR plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
PSTV lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
GOOD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.55, yield 11.4%
- Rev growth 8.0%, EPS growth 57.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.7%
- 51.0% 10Y total return vs MDRR's -80.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.55, current ratio 1.63x
NRXP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 101.1% revenue growth vs PSTV's -10.5%
- +55.3% vs PSTV's -57.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 101.1% revenue growth vs PSTV's -10.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.7% margin vs NRXP's -157.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs NRXP's 1.91 | |
| Dividends | 11.4% yield, vs MDRR's 4.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +55.3% vs PSTV's -57.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.7% ROA vs NRXP's -489.9% |
MDRR vs PSTV vs GOOD vs NRXP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MDRR vs PSTV vs GOOD vs NRXP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GOOD leads in 3 of 6 categories
MDRR leads 1 • PSTV leads 0 • NRXP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOD is the larger business by revenue, generating $166M annually — 684.9x NRXP's $242,000. GOOD is the more profitable business, keeping 12.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NRXP's -157.3%. On growth, MDRR holds the edge at +11.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $5M | $166M | $242,000 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | -$15M | $106M | -$31M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | -$22M | $21M | -$38M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12,992 | -$21M | $90M | -$12M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +91.5% | -11.7% | +59.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.3% | -2.9% | +27.9% | -63.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -23.0% | -4.3% | +12.7% | -157.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | -4.0% | +54.1% | -49.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.8% | -3.2% | +11.8% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -96.0% | +100.0% | +2.8% | -80.0% |
Valuation Metrics
MDRR leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MDRR's 2.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GOOD's 12.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12M | $14M | $616M | $85M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11M | $6M | $1.5B | $78M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.87x | -0.83x | 31.02x | -2.28x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 82.97x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.88x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.70x | — | 12.36x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.19x | 2.76x | 3.82x | 69.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.58x | 4.63x | 1.76x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 160.75x | — | 9.17x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOD delivers a 9.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-6 for PSTV. MDRR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GOOD's 2.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NRXP scores 5/9 vs GOOD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.5% | -5.6% | +9.7% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.9% | -156.0% | +1.7% | -4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.9% | — | +4.4% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.7% | -3.8% | +5.3% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.21x | 2.50x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | -$8M | $846M | -$7M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $9M | $11M | $8M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $784,987 | $821,000 | $856M | $631,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.21x | -4.07x | 1.46x | -24.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOD five years ago would be worth $9,026 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $73 for PSTV. Over the past 12 months, NRXP leads with a +55.3% total return vs PSTV's -57.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOD at 12.9% vs PSTV's -61.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.0% | -57.1% | +21.6% | +16.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.1% | -57.8% | +0.7% | +55.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.3% | -94.3% | +43.8% | -50.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.1% | -99.3% | -9.7% | -99.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.2% | -100.0% | +51.0% | -96.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.8% | -61.6% | +12.9% | -21.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MDRR and GOOD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MDRR is the less volatile stock with a -0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NRXP's 1.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOD currently trades 84.6% from its 52-week high vs PSTV's 25.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.35x | 1.82x | 0.55x | 1.91x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.52 | $23.43 | $15.03 | $3.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.55 | $0.27 | $10.33 | $1.62 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.8% | +25.4% | +84.6% | +79.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.0 | 49.8 | 49.1 | 64.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1K | 355K | 390K | 913K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PSTV and GOOD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, GOOD offers the higher dividend yield at 11.35% vs MDRR's 4.29%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $13.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 14 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.3% | — | +11.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.48 | — | $1.44 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | 0.0% | +0.7% | 0.0% |
GOOD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MDRR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
MDRR vs PSTV vs GOOD vs NRXP: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MDRR or PSTV or GOOD or NRXP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is the stronger pick with 8.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 5% for Plus Therapeutics, Inc. (PSTV). Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) offers the better valuation at 31. 0x trailing P/E (83. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MDRR or PSTV or GOOD or NRXP?
Over the past 5 years, Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) delivered a total return of -9.
7%, compared to -99. 3% for Plus Therapeutics, Inc. (PSTV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOD returned +51. 0% versus PSTV's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MDRR or PSTV or GOOD or NRXP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Medalist Diversified REIT, Inc.
(MDRR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 35β versus NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 1. 91β — meaning NRXP is approximately -649% more volatile than MDRR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Medalist Diversified REIT, Inc. (MDRR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for Gladstone Commercial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MDRR or PSTV or GOOD or NRXP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is pulling ahead at 8.
0% versus -10. 5% for Plus Therapeutics, Inc. (PSTV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Plus Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -79. 2% for Medalist Diversified REIT, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PSTV leads at 185. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MDRR or PSTV or GOOD or NRXP?
Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is the more profitable company, earning 12.
0% net margin versus -23. 4% for NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOD leads at 37. 2% versus -1324. 4% for NRXP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PSTV leads at 91. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MDRR or PSTV or GOOD or NRXP?
In this comparison, GOOD (11.
4% yield), MDRR (4. 3% yield) pay a dividend. PSTV, NRXP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is MDRR or PSTV or GOOD or NRXP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Medalist Diversified REIT, Inc.
(MDRR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 35), 4. 3% yield). NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NRXP) carries a higher beta of 1. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MDRR: -80. 2%, NRXP: -96. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MDRR and PSTV and GOOD and NRXP?
These companies operate in different sectors (MDRR (Real Estate) and PSTV (Healthcare) and GOOD (Real Estate) and NRXP (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MDRR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PSTV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GOOD is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NRXP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. MDRR, GOOD pay a dividend while PSTV, NRXP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.