Waste Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MEG vs CWST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Waste Management
MEG vs CWST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Waste Management | Waste Management |
| Market Cap | $798M | $5.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $821M | $1.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $7M |
| Gross Margin | 39.0% | 17.4% |
| Operating Margin | 2.0% | 4.5% |
| Forward P/E | 172.3x | 63.9x |
| Total Debt | $359M | $1.24B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $124M |
MEG vs CWST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Montrose Environmen… (MEG) | 100 | 101.5 | +1.5% |
| Casella Waste Syste… (CWST) | 100 | 143.0 | +43.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MEG vs CWST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MEG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 19.3%, EPS growth 93.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.1%
- 19.3% revenue growth vs CWST's 18.0%
- 0.7% margin vs CWST's 0.4%
CWST is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.32
- 10.6% 10Y total return vs MEG's -1.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.32, Low D/E 79.0%, current ratio 1.26x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.3% revenue growth vs CWST's 18.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (63.9x vs 172.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.7% margin vs CWST's 0.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs MEG's 1.82, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.6% vs CWST's -28.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.6% ROA vs CWST's 0.2%, ROIC 1.3% vs 2.6% |
MEG vs CWST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MEG vs CWST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MEG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CWST is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 2.3x MEG's $821M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 0.7% (MEG) to 0.4% (CWST). On growth, CWST holds the edge at +9.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $821M | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $67M | $414M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6M | $7M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $72M | $102M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.0% | +17.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | +4.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +0.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.7% | +5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.2% | +9.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +45.3% | -18.6% |
Valuation Metrics
MEG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CWST's 15.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MEG's 18.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $798M | $5.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $6.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -157.64x | 712.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 172.29x | 63.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.04x | 15.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.96x | 2.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.72x | 3.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.76x | 63.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MEG leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MEG delivers a 1.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $0 for CWST. CWST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.79x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MEG's 0.80x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.3% | +0.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.3% | +2.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.5% | +2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.80x | 0.79x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $348M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $124M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $359M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.67x | 1.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CWST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CWST five years ago would be worth $12,572 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,853 for MEG. Over the past 12 months, MEG leads with a +46.6% total return vs CWST's -28.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CWST at -2.2% vs MEG's -10.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.3% | -13.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.6% | -28.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.2% | -6.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.5% | +25.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.4% | +1059.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.1% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
CWST leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CWST is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MEG's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.82x | 0.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.00 | $121.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.92 | $74.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.0% | +70.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.8 | 52.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 332K | 874K |
Analyst Outlook
CWST leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MEG as "Buy" and CWST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 123.5% upside for MEG (target: $49) vs 39.3% for CWST (target: $119). MEG is the only dividend payer here at 0.54% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $49.33 | $119.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.12 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +15.3% | 0.0% |
MEG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CWST leads in 3 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
MEG vs CWST: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MEG or CWST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Montrose Environmental Group, Inc.
(MEG) is the stronger pick with 19. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 18. 0% for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST). Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) offers the better valuation at 712. 1x trailing P/E (63. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. (MEG) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MEG or CWST?
On forward P/E, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 63. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MEG or CWST?
Over the past 5 years, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) delivered a total return of +25. 7%, compared to -61. 5% for Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. (MEG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWST returned +1059% versus MEG's -1. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MEG or CWST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 32β versus Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. 's 1. 82β — meaning MEG is approximately 464% more volatile than CWST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 79% versus 80% for Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MEG or CWST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Montrose Environmental Group, Inc.
(MEG) is pulling ahead at 19. 3% versus 18. 0% for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. grew EPS 93. 7% year-over-year, compared to -47. 8% for Casella Waste Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWST leads at 19. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MEG or CWST?
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 4% net margin versus -0. 1% for Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CWST leads at 4. 9% versus 1. 5% for MEG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MEG leads at 34. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MEG or CWST more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) trades at 63. 9x forward P/E versus 172. 3x for Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. — 108. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MEG: 123. 5% to $49. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — MEG or CWST?
In this comparison, MEG (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. CWST does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MEG or CWST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 32), +1059% 10Y return). Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. (MEG) carries a higher beta of 1. 82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWST: +1059%, MEG: -1. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MEG and CWST?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
MEG pays a dividend while CWST does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.