Financial - Capital Markets
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MEGL vs FUTU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
MEGL vs FUTU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $6M | $51.52B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13M | $13.59B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $7.91B |
| Gross Margin | -26.3% | 82.0% |
| Operating Margin | -80.0% | 48.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 1.5x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $8.55B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $128M | $11.69B |
MEGL vs FUTU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Magic Empire Global… (MEGL) | 100 | 3.7 | -96.3% |
| Futu Holdings Limit… (FUTU) | 100 | 295.2 | +195.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MEGL vs FUTU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MEGL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.75
- Lower volatility, beta 0.75, Low D/E 3.3%, current ratio 36.88x
- Beta 0.75, current ratio 36.88x
FUTU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 35.8%, EPS growth 27.2%
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs MEGL's -99.7%
- 35.8% NII/revenue growth vs MEGL's -7.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.8% NII/revenue growth vs MEGL's -7.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs MEGL's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.75 vs FUTU's 2.04, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.1% vs MEGL's -40.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs MEGL's 0.5% |
MEGL vs FUTU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MEGL vs FUTU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUTU leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUTU is the larger business by revenue, generating $13.6B annually — 1063.1x MEGL's $13M. FUTU is the more profitable business, keeping 40.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MEGL's -37.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13M | $13.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $10.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | $7.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -26.3% | +82.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -80.0% | +48.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -37.0% | +40.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -36.4% | +2.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.7% | +112.0% |
Valuation Metrics
MEGL leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $51.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$10M | $51.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.77x | 29.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 1.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.30x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 58.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.60x | 29.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.36x | 5.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 13.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FUTU leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FUTU delivers a 26.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $26 in annual profit, vs $-4 for MEGL. MEGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUTU's 0.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FUTU scores 4/9 vs MEGL's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.0% | +26.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.8% | +4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.7% | +14.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.7% | +25.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$123M | -$3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $128M | $11.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $8.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -81.88x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUTU leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUTU five years ago would be worth $11,495 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $31 for MEGL. Over the past 12 months, FUTU leads with a +45.1% total return vs MEGL's -40.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUTU at 53.6% vs MEGL's -49.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.5% | -17.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -40.5% | +45.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.0% | +262.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | +15.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | +875.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -49.3% | +53.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MEGL and FUTU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MEGL is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUTU's 2.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FUTU currently trades 71.5% from its 52-week high vs MEGL's 44.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.75x | 2.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.62 | $202.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.87 | $99.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.3% | +71.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.3 | 65.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 18K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $224.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FUTU leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MEGL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
MEGL vs FUTU: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MEGL or FUTU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) is the stronger pick with 35.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 3% for Magic Empire Global Limited (MEGL). Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) offers the better valuation at 29. 2x trailing P/E (1. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MEGL or FUTU?
Over the past 5 years, Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) delivered a total return of +15.
0%, compared to -99. 7% for Magic Empire Global Limited (MEGL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUTU returned +875. 5% versus MEGL's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MEGL or FUTU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Magic Empire Global Limited (MEGL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
75β versus Futu Holdings Limited's 2. 04β — meaning FUTU is approximately 171% more volatile than MEGL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Magic Empire Global Limited (MEGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 31% for Futu Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MEGL or FUTU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) is pulling ahead at 35.
8% versus -7. 3% for Magic Empire Global Limited (MEGL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Futu Holdings Limited grew EPS 27. 2% year-over-year, compared to -873. 8% for Magic Empire Global Limited. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MEGL or FUTU?
Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) is the more profitable company, earning 40.
1% net margin versus -37. 0% for Magic Empire Global Limited — meaning it keeps 40. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUTU leads at 48. 7% versus -80. 0% for MEGL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUTU leads at 82. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MEGL or FUTU?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is MEGL or FUTU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Magic Empire Global Limited (MEGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
75)). Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MEGL: -99. 7%, FUTU: +875. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MEGL and FUTU?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MEGL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FUTU is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.