Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MEI vs APH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
MEI vs APH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $328M | $167.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $978M | $25.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-64M | $4.48B |
| Gross Margin | 15.3% | 37.3% |
| Operating Margin | -2.6% | 26.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 29.3x |
| Total Debt | $343M | $15.50B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $104M | $11.13B |
MEI vs APH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methode Electronics… (MEI) | 100 | 29.5 | -70.5% |
| Amphenol Corporation (APH) | 100 | 565.9 | +465.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MEI vs APH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MEI is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 6.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs APH's 0.5%
APH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 1.62, yield 0.5%
- Rev growth 51.7%, EPS growth 74.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.3%
- 9.0% 10Y total return vs MEI's -52.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 51.7% revenue growth vs MEI's -6.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.3% margin vs MEI's -6.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.62 vs MEI's 2.14 | |
| Dividends | 6.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs APH's 0.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +70.0% vs MEI's +43.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.6% ROA vs MEI's -5.6%, ROIC 28.3% vs -1.9% |
MEI vs APH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MEI vs APH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APH is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.9B annually — 26.5x MEI's $978M. APH is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MEI's -6.6%. On growth, APH holds the edge at +58.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $978M | $25.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $7.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$64M | $4.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $43M | $4.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +37.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +26.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.6% | +17.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.4% | +17.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | +58.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.4% | +24.1% |
Valuation Metrics
MEI leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MEI's 16.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than APH's 25.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $328M | $167.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $567M | $172.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.26x | 40.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 29.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.47x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.39x | 24.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.31x | 7.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.47x | 12.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 38.36x |
Profitability & Efficiency
APH leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
APH delivers a 34.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $-9 for MEI. MEI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.50x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to APH's 1.15x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), APH scores 6/9 vs MEI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.4% | +34.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.6% | +13.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.9% | +28.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.1% | +25.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.50x | 1.15x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $240M | $4.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $104M | $11.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $343M | $15.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.63x | 13.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
APH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in APH five years ago would be worth $40,876 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,474 for MEI. Over the past 12 months, APH leads with a +70.0% total return vs MEI's +43.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors APH at 54.3% vs MEI's -36.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +39.6% | -2.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +43.7% | +70.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.0% | +267.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.3% | +308.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.9% | +899.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -36.2% | +54.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MEI and APH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
APH is the less volatile stock with a 1.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MEI's 2.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MEI currently trades 85.8% from its 52-week high vs APH's 81.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.14x | 1.62x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.78 | $167.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.88 | $79.27 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.8% | +81.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.9 | 45.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 494K | 8.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MEI and APH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MEI as "Hold" and APH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 32.0% upside for APH (target: $180) vs -8.1% for MEI (target: $9). For income investors, MEI offers the higher dividend yield at 6.21% vs APH's 0.46%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.50 | $180.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.2% | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.57 | $0.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +0.4% |
APH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MEI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
MEI vs APH: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MEI or APH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amphenol Corporation (APH) is the stronger pick with 51.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 0% for Methode Electronics, Inc. (MEI). Amphenol Corporation (APH) offers the better valuation at 40. 9x trailing P/E (29. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amphenol Corporation (APH) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MEI or APH?
Over the past 5 years, Amphenol Corporation (APH) delivered a total return of +308.
8%, compared to -75. 3% for Methode Electronics, Inc. (MEI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APH returned +899. 3% versus MEI's -52. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MEI or APH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amphenol Corporation (APH) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
62β versus Methode Electronics, Inc. 's 2. 14β — meaning MEI is approximately 32% more volatile than APH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Methode Electronics, Inc. (MEI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 50% versus 115% for Amphenol Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MEI or APH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amphenol Corporation (APH) is pulling ahead at 51.
7% versus -6. 0% for Methode Electronics, Inc. (MEI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amphenol Corporation grew EPS 74. 0% year-over-year, compared to 49. 4% for Methode Electronics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, APH leads at 22. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MEI or APH?
Amphenol Corporation (APH) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
5% net margin versus -6. 0% for Methode Electronics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: APH leads at 25. 9% versus -2. 3% for MEI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — APH leads at 36. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is MEI or APH more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for APH: 32.
0% to $180. 33.
07Which pays a better dividend — MEI or APH?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Methode Electronics, Inc. (MEI) offers the highest yield at 6. 2%, versus 0. 5% for Amphenol Corporation (APH).
08Is MEI or APH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amphenol Corporation (APH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+899.
3% 10Y return). Methode Electronics, Inc. (MEI) carries a higher beta of 2. 14 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (APH: +899. 3%, MEI: -52. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MEI and APH?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MEI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; APH is a mid-cap high-growth stock. MEI pays a dividend while APH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.