Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MELI vs GRAB vs AMZN vs SE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
MELI vs GRAB vs AMZN vs SE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Software - Application | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $94.80B | $15.06B | $2.92T | $53.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $28.89B | $3.55B | $742.78B | $21.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.00B | $379M | $90.80B | $1.43B |
| Gross Margin | 44.5% | 43.5% | 50.6% | 44.9% |
| Operating Margin | 11.1% | 5.7% | 11.5% | 8.2% |
| Forward P/E | 39.2x | 34.6x | 34.8x | 25.1x |
| Total Debt | $11.39B | $2.05B | $152.99B | $4.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.67B | $3.43B | $86.81B | $2.41B |
MELI vs GRAB vs AMZN vs SE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI) | 100 | 111.6 | +11.6% |
| Grab Holdings Limit… (GRAB) | 100 | 29.5 | -70.5% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 166.5 | +66.5% |
| Sea Limited (SE) | 100 | 44.5 | -55.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MELI vs GRAB vs AMZN vs SE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MELI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.20
- Rev growth 39.1%, EPS growth 4.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.9%
- 13.7% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 7.0%
- 39.1% revenue growth vs AMZN's 12.4%
GRAB is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.42, Low D/E 30.4%, current ratio 1.75x
- Beta 1.42, current ratio 1.75x
AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- 12.2% margin vs SE's 6.8%
- +43.7% vs SE's -37.8%
- 11.5% ROA vs GRAB's 3.3%, ROIC 14.7% vs 3.3%
SE is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (25.1x vs 34.8x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 39.1% revenue growth vs AMZN's 12.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.1x vs 34.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs SE's 6.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.20 vs AMZN's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.7% vs SE's -37.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs GRAB's 3.3%, ROIC 14.7% vs 3.3% |
MELI vs GRAB vs AMZN vs SE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MELI vs GRAB vs AMZN vs SE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMZN leads in 2 of 6 categories
MELI leads 0 • GRAB leads 0 • SE leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 209.1x GRAB's $3.6B. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SE's 6.8%. On growth, MELI holds the edge at +44.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $28.9B | $3.6B | $742.8B | $21.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.0B | $395M | $155.9B | $2.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.0B | $379M | $90.8B | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10.1B | -$88M | -$2.5B | $3.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.5% | +43.5% | +50.6% | +44.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.1% | +5.7% | +11.5% | +8.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.9% | +10.7% | +12.2% | +6.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.0% | -2.5% | -0.3% | +18.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +44.6% | +23.5% | +16.6% | +38.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.5% | +2.1% | +74.8% | +126.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AMZN and SE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 37.8x trailing earnings, AMZN trades at a 69% valuation discount to SE's 121.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMZN's 20.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SE's 52.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $94.8B | $15.1B | $2.92T | $53.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $102.5B | $13.7B | $2.98T | $55.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 47.47x | 59.50x | 37.82x | 121.47x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 39.21x | 34.64x | 34.77x | 25.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.35x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 27.18x | 36.09x | 20.47x | 52.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.28x | 4.47x | 4.07x | 3.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 14.05x | 2.36x | 7.14x | 6.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.80x | 112.36x | 378.98x | 18.14x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — MELI and GRAB each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MELI delivers a 33.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $6 for GRAB. GRAB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MELI's 1.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SE scores 7/9 vs GRAB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +33.7% | +5.8% | +23.3% | +15.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.7% | +3.3% | +11.5% | +5.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +20.8% | +3.3% | +14.7% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +28.3% | +2.9% | +15.3% | +6.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.69x | 0.30x | 0.37x | 0.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7.7B | -$1.4B | $66.2B | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.7B | $3.4B | $86.8B | $2.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11.4B | $2.1B | $153.0B | $4.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 17.53x | 2.96x | 39.96x | 49.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,248 for GRAB. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs SE's -37.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs SE's 1.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.3% | -25.4% | +19.7% | -32.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -17.3% | -21.7% | +43.7% | -37.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.6% | +13.5% | +156.2% | +5.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.2% | -67.5% | +64.8% | -63.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1370.4% | -68.1% | +697.8% | +455.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.3% | +4.3% | +36.8% | +1.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MELI and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MELI is the less volatile stock with a 1.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs SE's 44.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.20x | 1.42x | 1.51x | 1.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2645.22 | $6.62 | $278.56 | $199.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1593.21 | $3.48 | $185.01 | $77.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.7% | +57.3% | +97.3% | +44.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.8 | 46.6 | 81.1 | 57.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 472K | 48.1M | 45.5M | 4.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MELI as "Buy", GRAB as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", SE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 76.8% upside for GRAB (target: $7) vs 13.1% for AMZN (target: $307).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2420.00 | $6.70 | $306.77 | $147.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 33 | 12 | 94 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +1.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AMZN leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Total Returns. 3 categories are tied.
MELI vs GRAB vs AMZN vs SE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MELI or GRAB or AMZN or SE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MercadoLibre, Inc.
(MELI) is the stronger pick with 39. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) offers the better valuation at 37. 8x trailing P/E (34. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MELI or GRAB or AMZN or SE?
On trailing P/E, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the cheapest at 37. 8x versus Sea Limited at 121. 5x. On forward P/E, Sea Limited is actually cheaper at 25. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MELI or GRAB or AMZN or SE?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to -67. 5% for Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MELI returned +1370% versus GRAB's -68. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MELI or GRAB or AMZN or SE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MercadoLibre, Inc.
(MELI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 20β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 26% more volatile than MELI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 169% for MercadoLibre, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MELI or GRAB or AMZN or SE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MercadoLibre, Inc.
(MELI) is pulling ahead at 39. 1% versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Grab Holdings Limited grew EPS 342. 2% year-over-year, compared to 4. 5% for MercadoLibre, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MELI leads at 38. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MELI or GRAB or AMZN or SE?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus 2. 6% for Sea Limited — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMZN leads at 11. 2% versus 3. 9% for SE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMZN leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MELI or GRAB or AMZN or SE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sea Limited (SE) trades at 25.
1x forward P/E versus 39. 2x for MercadoLibre, Inc. — 14. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GRAB: 76. 8% to $6. 70.
08Which pays a better dividend — MELI or GRAB or AMZN or SE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is MELI or GRAB or AMZN or SE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MercadoLibre, Inc.
(MELI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 20), +1370% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MELI: +1370%, GRAB: -68. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MELI and GRAB and AMZN and SE?
These companies operate in different sectors (MELI (Consumer Cyclical) and GRAB (Technology) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and SE (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MELI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GRAB is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; SE is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.