Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MENS vs NUVB vs CRL vs MEDP vs ICLR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
MENS vs NUVB vs CRL vs MEDP vs ICLR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $152M | $1.67B | $8.98B | $12.24B | $9.54B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $143M | $4.03B | $2.68B | $8.10B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3K | $-146M | $-185M | $460M | $599M |
| Gross Margin | — | 91.6% | 24.9% | 29.1% | 26.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | -105.0% | 11.8% | 21.0% | 12.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 16.4x | 25.2x | 10.5x |
| Total Debt | $18M | $10M | $3.07B | $250M | $3.60B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $98K | $164M | $214M | $497M | $539M |
MENS vs NUVB vs CRL vs MEDP vs ICLR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jyong Biotech Ltd. … (MENS) | 100 | 24.1 | -75.9% |
| Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) | 100 | 247.2 | +147.2% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 119.9 | +19.9% |
| Medpace Holdings, I… (MEDP) | 100 | 136.6 | +36.6% |
| ICON Public Limited… (ICLR) | 100 | 85.9 | -14.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MENS vs NUVB vs CRL vs MEDP vs ICLR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MENS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NUVB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 7.0%, EPS growth 71.6%
- 7.0% revenue growth vs CRL's -0.9%
- +136.3% vs MENS's -79.7%
CRL is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.52, current ratio 1.29x
MEDP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.26
- 14.4% 10Y total return vs CRL's 119.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 54.6%, current ratio 0.74x
- PEG 0.79 vs ICLR's 1.50
ICLR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (10.5x vs 16.4x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.0% revenue growth vs CRL's -0.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.5x vs 16.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.2% margin vs NUVB's -102.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.26 vs MENS's 2.49 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +136.3% vs MENS's -79.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.8% ROA vs NUVB's -23.8%, ROIC 154.9% vs -54.3% |
MENS vs NUVB vs CRL vs MEDP vs ICLR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MENS vs NUVB vs CRL vs MEDP vs ICLR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ICLR leads in 1 of 6 categories
MEDP leads 1 • NUVB leads 1 • MENS leads 0 • CRL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NUVB and MEDP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICLR and MENS operate at a comparable scale, with $8.1B and $0 in trailing revenue. MEDP is the more profitable business, keeping 17.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NUVB's -102.1%. On growth, NUVB holds the edge at +26.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $143M | $4.0B | $2.7B | $8.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1,936 | -$145M | $757M | $577M | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3,019 | -$146M | -$185M | $460M | $599M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3,624 | -$126M | $391M | $745M | $996M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +91.6% | +24.9% | +29.1% | +26.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -105.0% | +11.8% | +21.0% | +12.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -102.1% | -4.6% | +17.2% | +7.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -88.1% | +9.7% | +27.8% | +12.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +26.0% | +1.2% | +26.5% | +0.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.6% | +106.3% | -160.0% | +16.6% | -98.7% |
Valuation Metrics
ICLR leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.1x trailing earnings, ICLR trades at a 53% valuation discount to MEDP's 28.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MEDP offers better value at 0.88x vs ICLR's 1.87x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $152M | $1.7B | $9.0B | $12.2B | $9.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $170M | $1.5B | $11.8B | $12.0B | $12.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -51.64x | -8.03x | -62.52x | 28.06x | 13.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 16.42x | 25.24x | 10.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.88x | 1.87x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 12.98x | 21.31x | 7.95x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 26.61x | 2.24x | 4.84x | 1.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 5.38x | 2.81x | 27.57x | 1.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 17.31x | 17.96x | 8.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MEDP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MEDP delivers a 120.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $121 in annual profit, vs $-44 for NUVB. NUVB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRL's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICLR scores 7/9 vs MENS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -44.1% | -5.7% | +120.9% | +6.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.0% | -23.8% | -2.5% | +24.8% | +3.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -54.3% | +6.3% | +154.9% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -42.8% | +8.1% | +65.7% | +7.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.03x | 0.95x | 0.55x | 0.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $18M | -$154M | $2.9B | -$247M | $3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $98,000 | $164M | $214M | $497M | $539M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $18M | $10M | $3.1B | $250M | $3.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.00x | -162.11x | 6.38x | — | 3.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NUVB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MEDP five years ago would be worth $25,938 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,028 for MENS. Over the past 12 months, NUVB leads with a +136.3% total return vs MENS's -79.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NUVB at 43.8% vs MENS's -41.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -39.9% | -43.8% | -10.1% | -24.9% | -33.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -79.7% | +136.3% | +32.8% | +42.9% | -10.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.7% | +197.5% | -4.2% | +104.6% | -34.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.7% | -58.3% | -46.9% | +159.4% | -45.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.7% | -51.8% | +119.2% | +1442.7% | +91.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -41.3% | +43.8% | -1.4% | +27.0% | -13.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CRL and MEDP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MEDP is the less volatile stock with a 1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MENS's 2.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CRL currently trades 79.5% from its 52-week high vs MENS's 3.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.49x | 2.04x | 1.52x | 1.26x | 1.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $67.00 | $9.75 | $228.88 | $628.92 | $211.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.43 | $1.57 | $131.30 | $284.48 | $66.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.1% | +49.4% | +79.5% | +68.2% | +59.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.5 | 59.1 | 57.2 | 40.6 | 62.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 152K | 4.3M | 806K | 371K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NUVB as "Buy", CRL as "Buy", MEDP as "Hold", ICLR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 157.3% upside for NUVB (target: $12) vs 12.9% for CRL (target: $205).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $12.40 | $205.43 | $498.86 | $149.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 36 | 19 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.0% | +7.5% | +5.2% |
ICLR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). MEDP leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
MENS vs NUVB vs CRL vs MEDP vs ICLR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MENS or NUVB or CRL or MEDP or ICLR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nuvation Bio Inc.
(NUVB) is the stronger pick with 699. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) offers the better valuation at 13. 1x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MENS or NUVB or CRL or MEDP or ICLR?
On trailing P/E, ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) is the cheapest at 13.
1x versus Medpace Holdings, Inc. at 28. 1x. On forward P/E, ICON Public Limited Company is actually cheaper at 10. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Medpace Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 79x versus ICON Public Limited Company's 1. 50x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MENS or NUVB or CRL or MEDP or ICLR?
Over the past 5 years, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) delivered a total return of +159. 4%, compared to -79. 7% for Jyong Biotech Ltd. Ordinary Shares (MENS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MEDP returned +1443% versus MENS's -79. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MENS or NUVB or CRL or MEDP or ICLR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 26β versus Jyong Biotech Ltd. Ordinary Shares's 2. 49β — meaning MENS is approximately 98% more volatile than MEDP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 95% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MENS or NUVB or CRL or MEDP or ICLR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nuvation Bio Inc.
(NUVB) is pulling ahead at 699. 0% versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nuvation Bio Inc. grew EPS 71. 6% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MEDP leads at 20. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MENS or NUVB or CRL or MEDP or ICLR?
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 8% net margin versus -325. 3% for Nuvation Bio Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MEDP leads at 21. 1% versus -338. 7% for NUVB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NUVB leads at 86. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MENS or NUVB or CRL or MEDP or ICLR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 79x versus ICON Public Limited Company's 1. 50x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) trades at 10. 5x forward P/E versus 25. 2x for Medpace Holdings, Inc. — 14. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NUVB: 157. 3% to $12. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — MENS or NUVB or CRL or MEDP or ICLR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is MENS or NUVB or CRL or MEDP or ICLR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26), +1443% 10Y return). Jyong Biotech Ltd. Ordinary Shares (MENS) carries a higher beta of 2. 49 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MEDP: +1443%, MENS: -79. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MENS and NUVB and CRL and MEDP and ICLR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MENS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NUVB is a small-cap high-growth stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MEDP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ICLR is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.