Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MESA vs SKYW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
MESA vs SKYW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services |
| Market Cap | $879M | $3.52B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $381M | $4.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-166M | $429M |
| Gross Margin | 10.8% | 41.9% |
| Operating Margin | -44.6% | 14.6% |
| Forward P/E | 30.9x | 8.0x |
| Total Debt | $103M | $2.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $42M | — |
MESA vs SKYW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Jan 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mesa Air Group, Inc. (MESA) | 100 | 646.2 | +546.2% |
| SkyWest, Inc. (SKYW) | 100 | 313.1 | +213.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MESA vs SKYW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MESA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.82
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, current ratio 0.67x
- Beta 0.82, current ratio 0.67x
SKYW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.0%, EPS growth 33.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.5%
- 282.0% 10Y total return vs MESA's 78.7%
- 15.0% revenue growth vs MESA's -19.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.0% revenue growth vs MESA's -19.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.0x vs 30.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.4% margin vs MESA's -43.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs SKYW's 1.49 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.3% vs SKYW's -9.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.9% ROA vs MESA's -71.1%, ROIC 9.2% vs -62.9% |
MESA vs SKYW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MESA vs SKYW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SKYW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SKYW is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 10.8x MESA's $381M. SKYW is the more profitable business, keeping 10.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MESA's -43.6%. On growth, SKYW holds the edge at +6.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $381M | $4.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$150M | $967M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$166M | $429M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$53M | $339M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +41.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -44.6% | +14.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -43.6% | +10.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -14.0% | +8.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -21.3% | +6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +43.3% | +3.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SKYW leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $879M | $3.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $5.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.04x | 8.47x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 30.88x | 8.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.85x | 0.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.03x | 1.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 63.13x | 12.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SKYW leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SKYW delivers a 16.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-5 for MESA. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SKYW scores 8/9 vs MESA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.3% | +16.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -71.1% | +5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -62.9% | +9.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -86.2% | +10.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.87x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $61M | $2.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $42M | — |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $103M | $2.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.18x | 9.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MESA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MESA five years ago would be worth $18,834 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,693 for SKYW. Over the past 12 months, MESA leads with a +2034.1% total return vs SKYW's -9.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MESA at 118.6% vs SKYW's 47.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | 0.0% | -13.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2034.1% | -9.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +944.8% | +220.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.3% | +76.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +78.7% | +282.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +118.6% | +47.4% |
Risk & Volatility
MESA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MESA is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKYW's 1.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MESA currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs SKYW's 70.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 1.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.00 | $123.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.90 | $80.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +70.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 98.1 | 47.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 379K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MESA as "Hold" and SKYW as "Buy".
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $122.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% |
SKYW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MESA leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
MESA vs SKYW: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MESA or SKYW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SkyWest, Inc.
(SKYW) is the stronger pick with 15. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 9% for Mesa Air Group, Inc. (MESA). SkyWest, Inc. (SKYW) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (8. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SkyWest, Inc. (SKYW) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MESA or SKYW?
On forward P/E, SkyWest, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 8. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MESA or SKYW?
Over the past 5 years, Mesa Air Group, Inc.
(MESA) delivered a total return of +88. 3%, compared to +76. 9% for SkyWest, Inc. (SKYW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SKYW returned +282. 0% versus MESA's +78. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MESA or SKYW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mesa Air Group, Inc.
(MESA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus SkyWest, Inc. 's 1. 49β — meaning SKYW is approximately 83% more volatile than MESA relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — MESA or SKYW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SkyWest, Inc.
(SKYW) is pulling ahead at 15. 0% versus -19. 9% for Mesa Air Group, Inc. (MESA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SkyWest, Inc. grew EPS 33. 2% year-over-year, compared to -82. 4% for Mesa Air Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SKYW leads at 10. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MESA or SKYW?
SkyWest, Inc.
(SKYW) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 6% net margin versus -39. 9% for Mesa Air Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SKYW leads at 15. 2% versus -46. 5% for MESA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MESA leads at 99. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MESA or SKYW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SkyWest, Inc.
(SKYW) trades at 8. 0x forward P/E versus 30. 9x for Mesa Air Group, Inc. — 22. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — MESA or SKYW?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is MESA or SKYW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mesa Air Group, Inc.
(MESA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MESA: +78. 7%, SKYW: +282. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MESA and SKYW?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MESA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SKYW is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.