Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
META vs RDDT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
META vs RDDT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $1.53T | $32.88B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $214.96B | $2.47B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $70.59B | $708M |
| Gross Margin | 81.9% | 91.4% |
| Operating Margin | 41.2% | 25.1% |
| Forward P/E | 20.0x | 41.9x |
| Total Debt | $83.90B | $23M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $35.87B | $954M |
META vs RDDT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) | 100 | 124.6 | +24.6% |
| Reddit, Inc. (RDDT) | 100 | 348.1 | +248.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: META vs RDDT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
META carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.59, yield 0.3%
- 417.4% 10Y total return vs RDDT's 240.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.59, Low D/E 38.6%, current ratio 2.60x
RDDT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 69.4%, EPS growth 197.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 48.9%
- 69.4% revenue growth vs META's 22.2%
- +47.6% vs META's +1.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 69.4% revenue growth vs META's 22.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.0x vs 41.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.8% margin vs RDDT's 28.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.59 vs RDDT's 1.79 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.6% vs META's +1.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 23.1% ROA vs META's 20.8%, ROIC 18.4% vs 27.6% |
META vs RDDT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
META vs RDDT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RDDT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
META is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.0B annually — 86.9x RDDT's $2.5B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 32.8% (META) to 28.6% (RDDT). On growth, RDDT holds the edge at +69.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $215.0B | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $109.3B | $633M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $70.6B | $708M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $48.3B | $869M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +81.9% | +91.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +41.2% | +25.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +32.8% | +28.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.4% | +35.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.1% | +69.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +62.4% | +6.2% |
Valuation Metrics
META leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.8x trailing earnings, META trades at a 61% valuation discount to RDDT's 65.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, META's 15.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RDDT's 69.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.53T | $32.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.58T | $32.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.75x | 65.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.97x | 41.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.40x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.52x | 69.78x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.63x | 14.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.17x | 11.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 33.25x | 48.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RDDT leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
META delivers a 33.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $25 for RDDT. RDDT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to META's 0.39x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RDDT scores 7/9 vs META's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +33.2% | +25.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +20.8% | +23.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +27.6% | +18.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +29.4% | +17.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.39x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $48.0B | -$930M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $35.9B | $954M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $83.9B | $23M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 78.84x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RDDT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RDDT five years ago would be worth $34,040 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,351 for META. Over the past 12 months, RDDT leads with a +47.6% total return vs META's +1.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RDDT at 50.4% vs META's 37.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.9% | -29.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.3% | +47.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +161.9% | +240.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +93.5% | +240.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +417.4% | +240.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +37.8% | +50.4% |
Risk & Volatility
META leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
META is the less volatile stock with a 1.59 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RDDT's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. META currently trades 76.0% from its 52-week high vs RDDT's 60.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.59x | 1.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $796.25 | $282.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $520.26 | $94.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.0% | +60.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.3 | 61.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15.5M | 4.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates META as "Buy" and RDDT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 35.8% upside for META (target: $822) vs 32.9% for RDDT (target: $228). META is the only dividend payer here at 0.34% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $821.80 | $228.11 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 60 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.07 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | 0.0% |
RDDT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). META leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
META vs RDDT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is META or RDDT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Reddit, Inc.
(RDDT) is the stronger pick with 69. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 22. 2% for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) offers the better valuation at 25. 8x trailing P/E (20. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) a "Buy" — based on 60 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — META or RDDT?
On trailing P/E, Meta Platforms, Inc.
(META) is the cheapest at 25. 8x versus Reddit, Inc. at 65. 5x. On forward P/E, Meta Platforms, Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — META or RDDT?
Over the past 5 years, Reddit, Inc.
(RDDT) delivered a total return of +240. 4%, compared to +93. 5% for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: META returned +417. 4% versus RDDT's +240. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — META or RDDT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Meta Platforms, Inc.
(META) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 59β versus Reddit, Inc. 's 1. 79β — meaning RDDT is approximately 13% more volatile than META relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Reddit, Inc. (RDDT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 39% for Meta Platforms, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — META or RDDT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Reddit, Inc.
(RDDT) is pulling ahead at 69. 4% versus 22. 2% for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Reddit, Inc. grew EPS 197. 4% year-over-year, compared to -1. 6% for Meta Platforms, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RDDT leads at 48. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — META or RDDT?
Meta Platforms, Inc.
(META) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 1% net margin versus 24. 1% for Reddit, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: META leads at 41. 4% versus 20. 1% for RDDT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RDDT leads at 91. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is META or RDDT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Meta Platforms, Inc.
(META) trades at 20. 0x forward P/E versus 41. 9x for Reddit, Inc. — 21. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for META: 35. 8% to $821. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — META or RDDT?
In this comparison, META (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. RDDT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is META or RDDT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Meta Platforms, Inc.
(META) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+417. 4% 10Y return). Reddit, Inc. (RDDT) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (META: +417. 4%, RDDT: +240. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between META and RDDT?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare META vs GOOGL
GOOGL is one of the most direct listed alternatives to META.
Compare RDDT vs PINS
PINS is one of the most direct listed alternatives to RDDT.
Expand With GOOGL + PINS
GOOGL and PINS are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.