MG vs TISI

For growth investors, Mistras Group, Inc.

(MG) is the stronger pick with -0. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 2% for Team, Inc. (TISI). Mistras Group, Inc. (MG) offers the better valuation at 35. 4x trailing P/E (18. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mistras Group, Inc. (MG) a "Hold" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Mistras Group, Inc.

(MG) delivered a total return of +72. 7%, compared to -80. 6% for Team, Inc. (TISI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MG returned -19. 4% versus TISI's -93. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Team, Inc.

(TISI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus Mistras Group, Inc. 's 1. 11β — meaning MG is approximately 137% more volatile than TISI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mistras Group, Inc. (MG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 103% versus 212% for Team, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mistras Group, Inc.

(MG) is pulling ahead at -0. 8% versus -1. 2% for Team, Inc. (TISI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Team, Inc. grew EPS 50. 1% year-over-year, compared to -11. 7% for Mistras Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TISI leads at 2. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Mistras Group, Inc.

(MG) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 3% net margin versus -4. 5% for Team, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MG leads at 7. 4% versus 1. 2% for TISI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MG leads at 26. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Team, Inc.

(TISI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 47)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TISI: -93. 7%, MG: -19. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.