Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MGIC vs MSFT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$853M
5Y Perf.+70.9%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.08T
5Y Perf.+114.3%

MGIC vs MSFT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MGIC logoMGIC
MSFT logoMSFT
IndustryInformation Technology ServicesSoftware - Infrastructure
Market Cap$853M$3.08T
Revenue (TTM)$603M$318.27B
Net Income (TTM)$40M$125.22B
Gross Margin28.0%68.3%
Operating Margin10.8%46.8%
Forward P/E15.0x24.8x
Total Debt$86M$112.18B
Cash & Equiv.$113M$30.24B

MGIC vs MSFTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MGIC
MSFT
StockMay 20Mar 26Return
Magic Software Ente… (MGIC)100170.9+70.9%
Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT)100214.3+114.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MGIC vs MSFT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MSFT leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
The Defensive Pick

MGIC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.44, Low D/E 28.6%, current ratio 1.62x
  • PEG 0.63 vs MSFT's 1.32
  • Beta 1.44, yield 1.2%, current ratio 1.62x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
The Income Pick

MSFT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.85, yield 0.8%
  • Rev growth 14.9%, EPS growth 15.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.4%
  • 7.8% 10Y total return vs MGIC's 222.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMSFT logoMSFT14.9% revenue growth vs MGIC's 3.3%
ValueMGIC logoMGICLower P/E (15.0x vs 24.8x), PEG 0.63 vs 1.32
Quality / MarginsMSFT logoMSFT39.3% margin vs MGIC's 6.6%
Stability / SafetyMSFT logoMSFTBeta 0.85 vs MGIC's 1.44
DividendsMGIC logoMGIC1.2% yield, vs MSFT's 0.8%
Momentum (1Y)MGIC logoMGIC+23.7% vs MSFT's -4.5%
Efficiency (ROA)MSFT logoMSFT19.2% ROA vs MGIC's 7.4%, ROIC 24.9% vs 16.2%

MGIC vs MSFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MGICMagic Software Enterprises Ltd.
FY 2021
ItProfessionalServicesMember
80.1%$385M
SoftwareServicesMember
19.9%$96M
MSFTMicrosoft Corporation
FY 2025
Server Products And Cloud Services
34.9%$98.4B
Microsoft Three Six Five Commercial Products And Cloud Services
31.2%$87.8B
Gaming
8.3%$23.5B
Linked In Corporation
6.3%$17.8B
Windows
6.1%$17.3B
Search Advertising
4.9%$13.9B
Dynamics Products And Cloud Services
2.8%$7.8B
Other (3)
5.4%$15.2B

MGIC vs MSFT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMSFTLAGGINGMGIC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MSFT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

MSFT is the larger business by revenue, generating $318.3B annually — 527.6x MGIC's $603M. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MGIC's 6.6%. On growth, MSFT holds the edge at +18.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMGIC logoMGICMagic Software En…MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$603M$318.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$87M$192.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$40M$125.2B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$64M$72.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+28.0%+68.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+10.8%+46.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+6.6%+39.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+10.7%+22.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+13.1%+18.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+17.6%+23.4%
MSFT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MGIC leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 23.2x trailing earnings, MGIC trades at a 24% valuation discount to MSFT's 30.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MGIC offers better value at 0.98x vs MSFT's 1.62x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricMGIC logoMGICMagic Software En…MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…
Market CapShares × price$853M$3.08T
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$827M$3.17T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS23.17x30.43x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.98x24.77x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.98x1.62x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.07x19.46x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.54x10.94x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.83x9.02x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.64x43.06x
MGIC leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MSFT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

MSFT delivers a 33.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $13 for MGIC. MGIC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MSFT's 0.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MSFT scores 6/9 vs MGIC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricMGIC logoMGICMagic Software En…MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+13.4%+33.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+7.4%+19.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+16.2%+24.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+16.3%+29.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–946
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.29x0.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$27M$81.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$113M$30.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$86M$112.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense11.90x55.65x
MSFT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MSFT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MSFT five years ago would be worth $17,377 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,306 for MGIC. Over the past 12 months, MGIC leads with a +23.7% total return vs MSFT's -4.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MSFT at 11.2% vs MGIC's 10.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMGIC logoMGICMagic Software En…MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-33.3%-12.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+23.7%-4.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+36.5%+37.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+23.1%+73.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+222.0%+776.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+10.9%+11.2%
MSFT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

MSFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

MSFT is the less volatile stock with a 0.85 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MGIC's 1.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSFT currently trades 74.7% from its 52-week high vs MGIC's 62.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMGIC logoMGICMagic Software En…MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.44x0.85x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$28.00$555.45
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$14.31$356.28
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+62.1%+74.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10030.757.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded46K32.5M
MSFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — MGIC and MSFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates MGIC as "Buy" and MSFT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 34.2% upside for MSFT (target: $557) vs 6.4% for MGIC (target: $19). For income investors, MGIC offers the higher dividend yield at 1.17% vs MSFT's 0.78%.

MetricMGIC logoMGICMagic Software En…MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$18.50$556.88
# AnalystsCovering analysts681
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.2%+0.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises019
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.20$3.23
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.6%
Evenly matched — MGIC and MSFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

MSFT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MGIC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallMicrosoft Corporation (MSFT)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MGIC vs MSFT: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MGIC or MSFT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger pick with 14.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. (MGIC). Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. (MGIC) offers the better valuation at 23. 2x trailing P/E (15. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. (MGIC) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MGIC or MSFT?

On trailing P/E, Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.

(MGIC) is the cheapest at 23. 2x versus Microsoft Corporation at 30. 4x. On forward P/E, Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. is actually cheaper at 15. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. wins at 0. 63x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MGIC or MSFT?

Over the past 5 years, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) delivered a total return of +73.

8%, compared to +23. 1% for Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. (MGIC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSFT returned +776. 0% versus MGIC's +222. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MGIC or MSFT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

85β versus Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. 's 1. 44β — meaning MGIC is approximately 69% more volatile than MSFT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. (MGIC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 33% for Microsoft Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MGIC or MSFT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is pulling ahead at 14.

9% versus 3. 3% for Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. (MGIC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Microsoft Corporation grew EPS 15. 6% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MSFT leads at 12. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MGIC or MSFT?

Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.

1% net margin versus 6. 7% for Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus 11. 1% for MGIC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSFT leads at 68. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MGIC or MSFT more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. (MGIC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 63x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. (MGIC) trades at 15. 0x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Microsoft Corporation — 9. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MSFT: 34. 2% to $556. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MGIC or MSFT?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. (MGIC) offers the highest yield at 1. 2%, versus 0. 8% for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT).

09

Is MGIC or MSFT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

85), 0. 8% yield, +776. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +776. 0%, MGIC: +222. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MGIC and MSFT?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

MGIC

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MSFT

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MGIC and MSFT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MGIC: 13.1% · MSFT: 18.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(MGIC: 6.6% · MSFT: 39.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(MGIC: 23.2x · MSFT: 30.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.