Rental & Leasing Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MGRC vs URI vs TREX vs WSC vs KFRC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Rental & Leasing Services
Construction
Rental & Leasing Services
Staffing & Employment Services
MGRC vs URI vs TREX vs WSC vs KFRC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Rental & Leasing Services | Construction | Rental & Leasing Services | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $2.78B | $58.51B | $4.00B | $4.13B | $802M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $947M | $16.36B | $1.17B | $2.28B | $1.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $155M | $2.51B | $190M | $-53M | $35M |
| Gross Margin | 45.9% | 36.3% | 39.2% | 48.8% | 27.2% |
| Operating Margin | 25.5% | 24.7% | 22.0% | 21.2% | 3.8% |
| Forward P/E | 17.5x | 20.6x | 24.4x | 22.2x | 17.5x |
| Total Debt | $528M | $16.48B | $229M | $4.14B | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $295K | $459M | $4M | $15M | $2M |
MGRC vs URI vs TREX vs WSC vs KFRC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) | 100 | 202.8 | +102.8% |
| United Rentals, Inc. (URI) | 100 | 694.4 | +594.4% |
| Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) | 100 | 66.5 | -33.5% |
| WillScot Holdings C… (WSC) | 100 | 175.4 | +75.4% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 139.2 | +39.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MGRC vs URI vs TREX vs WSC vs KFRC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MGRC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and quality.
- Lower P/E (17.5x vs 17.5x)
- 16.4% margin vs WSC's -2.3%
URI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 4.9%, EPS growth -0.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.4%
- 14.7% 10Y total return vs MGRC's 393.0%
- PEG 0.79 vs TREX's 7.30
- 4.9% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4%
TREX is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 12.4% ROA vs WSC's -0.9%, ROIC 16.4% vs 7.4%
Among these 5 stocks, WSC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
KFRC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 3.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 56.0%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.53, yield 3.5%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.53 vs WSC's 2.06, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.9% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.5x vs 17.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.4% margin vs WSC's -2.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs WSC's 2.06, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs MGRC's 1.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.1% vs TREX's -37.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.4% ROA vs WSC's -0.9%, ROIC 16.4% vs 7.4% |
MGRC vs URI vs TREX vs WSC vs KFRC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MGRC vs URI vs TREX vs WSC vs KFRC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WSC leads in 1 of 6 categories
TREX leads 1 • URI leads 1 • KFRC leads 1 • MGRC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MGRC and URI and WSC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
URI is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.4B annually — 17.3x MGRC's $947M. MGRC is the more profitable business, keeping 16.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WSC's -2.3%. On growth, URI holds the edge at +7.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $947M | $16.4B | $1.2B | $2.3B | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $350M | $6.5B | $321M | $831M | $56M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $155M | $2.5B | $190M | -$53M | $35M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $196M | $1.5B | $147M | $521M | $43M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.9% | +36.3% | +39.2% | +48.8% | +27.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.5% | +24.7% | +22.0% | +21.2% | +3.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.4% | +15.3% | +16.2% | -2.3% | +2.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.7% | +9.1% | +12.5% | +22.8% | +3.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.6% | +7.2% | -3.9% | -6.1% | +0.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.3% | +5.6% | -77.8% | -3.1% | +2.2% |
Valuation Metrics
WSC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.8x trailing earnings, MGRC trades at a 26% valuation discount to URI's 24.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), URI offers better value at 0.93x vs TREX's 6.31x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.8B | $58.5B | $4.0B | $4.1B | $802M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.3B | $74.5B | $4.2B | $8.3B | $869M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.80x | 24.19x | 21.12x | -78.76x | 22.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.46x | 20.58x | 24.41x | 22.16x | 17.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.02x | 0.93x | 6.31x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.41x | 10.52x | 13.17x | 8.99x | 15.63x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.94x | 3.63x | 3.41x | 1.81x | 0.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.25x | 6.73x | 3.89x | 4.87x | 6.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.14x | 88.38x | 29.75x | 5.60x | 17.13x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TREX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
URI delivers a 27.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-5 for WSC. TREX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WSC's 4.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MGRC scores 6/9 vs WSC's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.8% | +27.9% | +19.2% | -5.3% | +27.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.6% | +8.4% | +12.4% | -0.9% | +9.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.5% | +12.4% | +16.4% | +7.4% | +19.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.3% | +15.6% | +23.2% | +9.2% | +20.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.43x | 1.84x | 0.22x | 4.84x | 0.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $528M | $16.0B | $225M | $4.1B | $68M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $295,000 | $459M | $4M | $15M | $2M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $528M | $16.5B | $229M | $4.1B | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.35x | 5.72x | 3394.21x | 0.73x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
URI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in URI five years ago would be worth $28,719 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,487 for TREX. Over the past 12 months, URI leads with a +43.1% total return vs TREX's -37.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors URI at 40.8% vs WSC's -19.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.4% | +10.8% | +4.9% | +17.7% | +41.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.0% | +43.1% | -37.4% | -14.5% | +20.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.6% | +178.9% | -31.9% | -47.6% | -13.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.1% | +187.2% | -65.1% | -20.6% | -14.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +393.0% | +1465.4% | +222.2% | +140.1% | +198.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.6% | +40.8% | -12.0% | -19.4% | -4.8% |
Risk & Volatility
KFRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KFRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WSC's 2.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KFRC currently trades 92.4% from its 52-week high vs TREX's 54.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 1.19x | 1.47x | 2.06x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $128.41 | $1021.47 | $68.78 | $31.88 | $47.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $94.99 | $645.18 | $29.77 | $14.91 | $24.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.0% | +91.4% | +54.7% | +71.6% | +92.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.4 | 64.1 | 36.4 | 59.7 | 70.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 212K | 560K | 1.8M | 2.2M | 308K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MGRC and KFRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MGRC as "Buy", URI as "Buy", TREX as "Hold", WSC as "Buy", KFRC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 61.8% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs 3.6% for WSC (target: $24). For income investors, KFRC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.53% vs URI's 0.77%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $140.00 | $1037.13 | $44.50 | $23.67 | $71.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 40 | 31 | 13 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.7% | +0.8% | — | +1.2% | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 36 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.94 | $7.18 | — | $0.28 | $1.55 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.4% | +1.4% | +2.4% | +6.3% |
WSC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). TREX leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
MGRC vs URI vs TREX vs WSC vs KFRC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MGRC or URI or TREX or WSC or KFRC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, United Rentals, Inc.
(URI) is the stronger pick with 4. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) offers the better valuation at 17. 8x trailing P/E (17. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MGRC or URI or TREX or WSC or KFRC?
On trailing P/E, McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) is the cheapest at 17.
8x versus United Rentals, Inc. at 24. 2x. On forward P/E, McGrath RentCorp is actually cheaper at 17. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: United Rentals, Inc. wins at 0. 79x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 30x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MGRC or URI or TREX or WSC or KFRC?
Over the past 5 years, United Rentals, Inc.
(URI) delivered a total return of +187. 2%, compared to -65. 1% for Trex Company, Inc. (TREX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: URI returned +1503% versus WSC's +145. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MGRC or URI or TREX or WSC or KFRC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus WillScot Holdings Corporation's 2. 06β — meaning WSC is approximately 290% more volatile than KFRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 5% for WillScot Holdings Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MGRC or URI or TREX or WSC or KFRC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), United Rentals, Inc.
(URI) is pulling ahead at 4. 9% versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: United Rentals, Inc. grew EPS -0. 2% year-over-year, compared to -293. 3% for WillScot Holdings Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MGRC leads at 14. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MGRC or URI or TREX or WSC or KFRC?
McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
6% net margin versus -2. 3% for WillScot Holdings Corporation — meaning it keeps 16. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MGRC leads at 25. 9% versus 3. 8% for KFRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WSC leads at 46. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MGRC or URI or TREX or WSC or KFRC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, United Rentals, Inc. (URI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 79x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 30x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) trades at 17. 5x forward P/E versus 24. 4x for Trex Company, Inc. — 7. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 61. 8% to $71. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MGRC or URI or TREX or WSC or KFRC?
In this comparison, KFRC (3.
5% yield), MGRC (1. 7% yield), WSC (1. 2% yield), URI (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. TREX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MGRC or URI or TREX or WSC or KFRC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, United Rentals, Inc.
(URI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 19), 0. 8% yield, +1503% 10Y return). WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC) carries a higher beta of 2. 06 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (URI: +1503%, WSC: +145. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MGRC and URI and TREX and WSC and KFRC?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MGRC is a small-cap deep-value stock; URI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TREX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WSC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. MGRC, URI, WSC, KFRC pay a dividend while TREX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.