Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MGTX vs NTLA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
MGTX vs NTLA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $779M | $1.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $27M | $68M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-169M | $-413M |
| Gross Margin | 41.0% | -25.6% |
| Operating Margin | -6.0% | -6.5% |
| Total Debt | $85M | $93M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $104M | $155M |
MGTX vs NTLA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MeiraGTx Holdings p… (MGTX) | 100 | 65.2 | -34.8% |
| Intellia Therapeuti… (NTLA) | 100 | 78.3 | -21.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MGTX vs NTLA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MGTX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.92
- Rev growth 137.4%, EPS growth -42.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.1%
- -35.5% 10Y total return vs NTLA's -42.9%
NTLA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- -6.1% margin vs MGTX's -6.2%
- +88.1% vs MGTX's +78.9%
- -45.2% ROA vs MGTX's -76.5%, ROIC -44.0% vs -167.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 137.4% revenue growth vs NTLA's 16.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | -6.1% margin vs MGTX's -6.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.92 vs NTLA's 2.37 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +88.1% vs MGTX's +78.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -45.2% ROA vs MGTX's -76.5%, ROIC -44.0% vs -167.7% |
MGTX vs NTLA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MGTX and NTLA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTLA is the larger business by revenue, generating $68M annually — 2.5x MGTX's $27M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -6.1% (NTLA) to -6.2% (MGTX). On growth, NTLA holds the edge at +78.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $27M | $68M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$151M | -$431M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$169M | -$413M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$121M | -$396M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.0% | -25.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.0% | -6.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.2% | -6.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | -5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -96.2% | +78.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.7% | +34.6% |
Valuation Metrics
MGTX leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $779M | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $760M | $1.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.57x | -3.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 23.41x | 23.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.96x | 2.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NTLA leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NTLA delivers a -56.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-57 in annual profit, vs $-11 for MGTX. NTLA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGTX's 1.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTLA scores 4/9 vs MGTX's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.7% | -56.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -76.5% | -45.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -167.7% | -44.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -70.1% | -48.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.25x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$19M | -$62M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $104M | $155M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $85M | $93M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12.44x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MGTX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MGTX five years ago would be worth $6,944 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,024 for NTLA. Over the past 12 months, NTLA leads with a +88.1% total return vs MGTX's +78.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MGTX at 18.1% vs NTLA's -31.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +23.9% | +48.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +78.9% | +88.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +64.6% | -68.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.6% | -79.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.5% | -42.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.1% | -31.8% |
Risk & Volatility
MGTX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MGTX is the less volatile stock with a 1.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NTLA's 2.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MGTX currently trades 81.7% from its 52-week high vs NTLA's 48.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.92x | 2.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.85 | $28.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.55 | $6.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.7% | +48.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.6 | 50.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 725K | 5.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MGTX as "Buy" and NTLA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 141.0% upside for MGTX (target: $23) vs 52.3% for NTLA (target: $21).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.33 | $20.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 39 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MGTX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). NTLA leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
MGTX vs NTLA: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MGTX or NTLA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MeiraGTx Holdings plc (MGTX) is the stronger pick with 137.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 16. 9% for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA). Analysts rate MeiraGTx Holdings plc (MGTX) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MGTX or NTLA?
Over the past 5 years, MeiraGTx Holdings plc (MGTX) delivered a total return of -30.
6%, compared to -79. 8% for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MGTX returned -35. 5% versus NTLA's -42. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MGTX or NTLA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MeiraGTx Holdings plc (MGTX) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
92β versus Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 37β — meaning NTLA is approximately 23% more volatile than MGTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 125% for MeiraGTx Holdings plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MGTX or NTLA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MeiraGTx Holdings plc (MGTX) is pulling ahead at 137.
4% versus 16. 9% for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 27. 4% year-over-year, compared to -42. 3% for MeiraGTx Holdings plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTLA leads at 9. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MGTX or NTLA?
MeiraGTx Holdings plc (MGTX) is the more profitable company, earning -444.
1% net margin versus -609. 9% for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps -444. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MGTX leads at -493. 4% versus -651. 7% for NTLA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTLA leads at 76. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MGTX or NTLA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is MGTX or NTLA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MeiraGTx Holdings plc (MGTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) carries a higher beta of 2. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MGTX: -35. 5%, NTLA: -42. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MGTX and NTLA?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.