MHH vs KFRC vs HURN vs EXLS vs EPAM

For growth investors, EPAM Systems, Inc.

(EPAM) is the stronger pick with 15. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (8. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, EPAM Systems, Inc.

(EPAM) is the cheapest at 15. 5x versus Mastech Digital, Inc. at 25. 8x. On forward P/E, EPAM Systems, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ExlService Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 58x versus EPAM Systems, Inc. 's 0. 70x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Huron Consulting Group Inc.

(HURN) delivered a total return of +120. 2%, compared to -77. 3% for EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXLS returned +221. 4% versus EPAM's +48. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mastech Digital, Inc.

(MHH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus EPAM Systems, Inc. 's 1. 21β — meaning EPAM is approximately 243% more volatile than MHH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 104% for Huron Consulting Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), EPAM Systems, Inc.

(EPAM) is pulling ahead at 15. 4% versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mastech Digital, Inc. grew EPS 145. 9% year-over-year, compared to -25. 2% for Kforce Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HURN leads at 14. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

ExlService Holdings, Inc.

(EXLS) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 0% net margin versus 1. 7% for Mastech Digital, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXLS leads at 15. 0% versus 1. 9% for MHH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EXLS leads at 38. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, ExlService Holdings, Inc. (EXLS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 58x versus EPAM Systems, Inc. 's 0. 70x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) trades at 8. 2x forward P/E versus 18. 0x for Kforce Inc. — 9. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EPAM: 88. 7% to $197. 00.

In this comparison, KFRC (3.

6% yield) pays a dividend. MHH, HURN, EXLS, EPAM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.

(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 3. 6% yield, +195. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KFRC: +195. 5%, EPAM: +48. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (MHH (Industrials) and KFRC (Industrials) and HURN (Industrials) and EXLS (Technology) and EPAM (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MHH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HURN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EXLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EPAM is a small-cap high-growth stock. KFRC pays a dividend while MHH, HURN, EXLS, EPAM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.