Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MI vs MARA vs RIOT vs CIFR vs CLSK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MI
NFT Limited

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalAMEX • HK
Market Cap$1M
5Y Perf.-99.6%
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.83B
5Y Perf.+488.0%
RIOT
Riot Platforms, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.14B
5Y Perf.+637.3%
CIFR
Cipher Mining Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$8.40B
5Y Perf.+110.0%
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.58B
5Y Perf.+85.2%

MI vs MARA vs RIOT vs CIFR vs CLSK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MI logoMI
MARA logoMARA
RIOT logoRIOT
CIFR logoCIFR
CLSK logoCLSK
IndustrySpecialty RetailFinancial - Capital MarketsFinancial - Capital MarketsFinancial - Capital MarketsSoftware - Application
Market Cap$1M$4.83B$9.14B$8.40B$3.58B
Revenue (TTM)$2M$907M$647M$224M$785M
Net Income (TTM)$4M$-1.31B$-867M$-898M$-261M
Gross Margin71.9%-47.7%-15.6%28.4%41.4%
Operating Margin-100.3%-90.6%-61.8%-150.7%-26.4%
Forward P/E0.1x12.5x
Total Debt$0.00$3.65B$280M$2.77B$824M
Cash & Equiv.$82M$547M$234M$628M$43M

MI vs MARA vs RIOT vs CIFR vs CLSKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MI
MARA
RIOT
CIFR
CLSK
StockOct 20May 26Return
NFT Limited (MI)1000.4-99.6%
Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA)100588.0+488.0%
Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT)100737.3+637.3%
Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR)100210.0+110.0%
CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK)100185.2+85.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MI vs MARA vs RIOT vs CIFR vs CLSK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MI leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. CleanSpark, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. CIFR also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
MI
NFT Limited
The Defensive Pick

MI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.73, current ratio 15.13x
  • Beta 0.73, current ratio 15.13x
  • Lower P/E (0.1x vs 12.5x)
  • 202.5% margin vs CIFR's -367.2%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
The Financial Play

MARA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
RIOT
Riot Platforms, Inc.
The Banking Pick

RIOT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 3.87
Best for: income & stability
CIFR
Cipher Mining Inc.
The Banking Pick

CIFR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 108.9% 10Y total return vs RIOT's 7.9%
  • +5.8% vs MI's -91.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.
The Growth Play

CLSK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 102.2%, EPS growth 262.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 79.9%
  • 102.2% revenue growth vs MI's -65.6%
  • 0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCLSK logoCLSK102.2% revenue growth vs MI's -65.6%
ValueMI logoMILower P/E (0.1x vs 12.5x)
Quality / MarginsMI logoMI202.5% margin vs CIFR's -367.2%
Stability / SafetyMI logoMIBeta 0.73 vs CIFR's 3.87
DividendsCLSK logoCLSK0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CIFR logoCIFR+5.8% vs MI's -91.2%
Efficiency (ROA)MI logoMI4.4% ROA vs CIFR's -24.7%

MI vs MARA vs RIOT vs CIFR vs CLSK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MINFT Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

MARAMarathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Hosting Services
100.0%$5M
RIOTRiot Platforms, Inc.
FY 2025
Bitcoin Mining Segment
85.9%$576M
Engineering Segment
14.1%$94M
CIFRCipher Mining Inc.
FY 2025
Bitcoin Mining
100.0%$224M
CLSKCleanSpark, Inc.
FY 2021
Consolidated Revenues
96.9%$49M
Other Revenue And Eliminations
3.1%$2M

MI vs MARA vs RIOT vs CIFR vs CLSK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMILAGGINGCLSK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — MI and CLSK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

MARA is the larger business by revenue, generating $907M annually — 468.4x MI's $2M. MI is the more profitable business, keeping 2.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CIFR's -3.7%. On growth, CLSK holds the edge at +11.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMI logoMINFT LimitedMARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…CIFR logoCIFRCipher Mining Inc.CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2M$907M$647M$224M$785M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$463,178$627M-$450M-$203M$181M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$4M-$1.3B-$867M-$898M-$261M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$21M-$312M-$1.0B-$930M-$1.0B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+71.9%-47.7%-15.6%+28.4%+41.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-100.3%-90.6%-61.8%-150.7%-26.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+2.0%-144.6%-102.4%-3.7%-33.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-10.7%-34.4%-119.6%-3.1%-133.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-19.7%+11.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-105.7%-4.8%-60.0%-154.5%-2.6%
Evenly matched — MI and CLSK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MI leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

At 0.1x trailing earnings, MI trades at a 99% valuation discount to CLSK's 12.5x P/E.

MetricMI logoMINFT LimitedMARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…CIFR logoCIFRCipher Mining Inc.CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$1M$4.8B$9.1B$8.4B$3.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$81M$7.9B$9.2B$10.5B$4.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS0.14x-3.44x-12.36x-9.62x12.48x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.53x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.45x5.32x14.12x37.49x4.67x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.01x1.30x2.87x9.44x2.04x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
MI leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

MI delivers a 5.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-116 for CIFR. RIOT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CIFR's 3.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLSK scores 5/9 vs CIFR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricMI logoMINFT LimitedMARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…CIFR logoCIFRCipher Mining Inc.CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+5.3%-30.5%-28.8%-115.5%-13.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.4%-17.1%-21.5%-24.7%-8.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-9.0%-8.7%-11.7%+10.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-1.3%-12.1%-11.0%-15.6%+13.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–933335
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.05x0.10x3.31x0.38x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$82M$3.1B$46M$2.1B$781M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$82M$547M$234M$628M$43M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$3.6B$280M$2.8B$824M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-16.21x4.73x-16.47x-32.12x-18.49x
MI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CIFR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CIFR five years ago would be worth $20,789 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2 for MI. Over the past 12 months, CIFR leads with a +584.9% total return vs MI's -91.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CIFR at 119.7% vs MI's -80.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMI logoMINFT LimitedMARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…CIFR logoCIFRCipher Mining Inc.CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-94.8%+28.2%+70.3%+27.7%+21.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-91.2%-4.7%+207.5%+584.9%+74.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.3%+36.1%+129.8%+960.8%+229.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-59.5%-27.8%+107.9%-26.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%-51.6%+787.3%+108.9%-84.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-80.7%+10.8%+32.0%+119.7%+48.8%
CIFR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MI and RIOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MI is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CIFR's 3.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RIOT currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs MI's 3.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMI logoMINFT LimitedMARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…CIFR logoCIFRCipher Mining Inc.CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.73x3.11x3.87x3.87x3.39x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$6.23$23.45$24.14$25.52$23.61
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.19$6.66$7.68$2.95$7.91
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+3.4%+54.2%+99.9%+81.1%+59.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10021.769.674.567.571.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.8M47.6M18.4M24.9M19.0M
Evenly matched — MI and RIOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: MARA as "Buy", RIOT as "Buy", CIFR as "Buy", CLSK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.6% upside for CLSK (target: $20) vs 15.7% for RIOT (target: $28). CLSK is the only dividend payer here at 0.24% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricMI logoMINFT LimitedMARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…CIFR logoCIFRCipher Mining Inc.CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$16.13$27.90$27.86$20.21
# AnalystsCovering analysts19181210
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises22
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.03
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.0%+0.0%+1.1%+4.1%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

MI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CIFR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallNFT Limited (MI)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MI vs MARA vs RIOT vs CIFR vs CLSK: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MI or MARA or RIOT or CIFR or CLSK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) is the stronger pick with 102. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -65. 6% for NFT Limited (MI). NFT Limited (MI) offers the better valuation at 0. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MI or MARA or RIOT or CIFR or CLSK?

On trailing P/E, NFT Limited (MI) is the cheapest at 0.

1x versus CleanSpark, Inc. at 12. 5x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MI or MARA or RIOT or CIFR or CLSK?

Over the past 5 years, Cipher Mining Inc.

(CIFR) delivered a total return of +107. 9%, compared to -100. 0% for NFT Limited (MI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RIOT returned +787. 3% versus MI's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MI or MARA or RIOT or CIFR or CLSK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NFT Limited (MI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

73β versus Cipher Mining Inc. 's 3. 87β — meaning CIFR is approximately 430% more volatile than MI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 3% for Cipher Mining Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MI or MARA or RIOT or CIFR or CLSK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) is pulling ahead at 102. 2% versus -65. 6% for NFT Limited (MI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NFT Limited grew EPS 280. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1435. 7% for Cipher Mining Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MI leads at 83. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MI or MARA or RIOT or CIFR or CLSK?

NFT Limited (MI) is the more profitable company, earning 850.

1% net margin versus -367. 2% for Cipher Mining Inc. — meaning it keeps 850. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLSK leads at 41. 6% versus -150. 7% for CIFR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MI leads at 74. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Which pays a better dividend — MI or MARA or RIOT or CIFR or CLSK?

In this comparison, CLSK (0.

2% yield) pays a dividend. MI, MARA, RIOT, CIFR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is MI or MARA or RIOT or CIFR or CLSK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, NFT Limited (MI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

73)). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) carries a higher beta of 3. 39 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MI: -99. 9%, CLSK: -84. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between MI and MARA and RIOT and CIFR and CLSK?

These companies operate in different sectors (MI (Consumer Cyclical) and MARA (Financial Services) and RIOT (Financial Services) and CIFR (Financial Services) and CLSK (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MI is a small-cap deep-value stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock; RIOT is a small-cap high-growth stock; CIFR is a small-cap high-growth stock; CLSK is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MI

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 121%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MARA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RIOT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 35%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CIFR

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 24%
  • Gross Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLSK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MI and MARA and RIOT and CIFR and CLSK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MI: -19.7% · MARA: 38.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.