Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MITQ vs MVIS vs VUZI vs NCMI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Consumer Electronics
Advertising Agencies
MITQ vs MVIS vs VUZI vs NCMI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Consumer Electronics | Advertising Agencies |
| Market Cap | $6M | $189M | $232M | $346M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19M | $1M | $5M | $243M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-275K | $-95M | $-32.28B | $-11M |
| Gross Margin | 27.1% | -14.4% | -0.0% | 30.3% |
| Operating Margin | -2.7% | -57.4% | -5.2% | -5.7% |
| Total Debt | $1M | $37M | $1.00B | $23M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $32M | $21.15B | $75M |
MITQ vs MVIS vs VUZI vs NCMI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moving iMage Techno… (MITQ) | 100 | 16.0 | -84.0% |
| MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS) | 100 | 4.5 | -95.5% |
| Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) | 100 | 19.3 | -80.7% |
| National CineMedia,… (NCMI) | 100 | 10.7 | -89.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MITQ vs MVIS vs VUZI vs NCMI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MITQ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 23.6%, current ratio 1.84x
- Better valuation composite
- -1.5% margin vs MVIS's -78.6%
- Beta 0.74 vs VUZI's 3.40
MVIS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
VUZI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 3.40, yield 10.1%
- Rev growth 1.1K%, EPS growth 61.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.1%
- -35.7% 10Y total return vs MVIS's -66.2%
- Beta 3.40, yield 10.1%, current ratio 5.56x
NCMI is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- -2.1% ROA vs VUZI's -321.3%, ROIC -2.9% vs -10.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.1K% revenue growth vs MVIS's -74.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -1.5% margin vs MVIS's -78.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs VUZI's 3.40 | |
| Dividends | 10.1% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs NCMI's 3.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +63.4% vs MVIS's -45.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -2.1% ROA vs VUZI's -321.3%, ROIC -2.9% vs -10.7% |
MITQ vs MVIS vs VUZI vs NCMI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MITQ vs MVIS vs VUZI vs NCMI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VUZI leads in 2 of 6 categories
NCMI leads 1 • MITQ leads 0 • MVIS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MITQ and VUZI and NCMI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NCMI is the larger business by revenue, generating $243M annually — 201.3x MVIS's $1M. MITQ is the more profitable business, keeping -1.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MVIS's -78.6%. On growth, VUZI holds the edge at +4933.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19M | $1M | $5M | $243M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$358,000 | -$64M | -$30.9B | $24M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$275,000 | -$95M | -$32.3B | -$11M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | -$59M | -$20.8B | $4M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.1% | -14.4% | -0.0% | +30.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | -57.4% | -5.2% | -5.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.5% | -78.6% | -5.1% | -4.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.5% | -49.2% | -3.3% | +1.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.2% | -86.5% | +4933.1% | +7.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.8% | +14.3% | +25.0% | +24.0% |
Valuation Metrics
VUZI leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $189M | $232M | $346M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2M | $193M | -$19.9B | $293M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.48x | -1.76x | -6.81x | -33.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 12.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.34x | 156.30x | 0.04x | 1.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.26x | 3.03x | 0.01x | 0.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.11x | — | — | 123.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NCMI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NCMI delivers a -2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-5 for VUZI. VUZI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MVIS's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NCMI scores 7/9 vs VUZI's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.5% | -137.4% | -5.2% | -2.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -20.7% | -74.3% | -3.2% | -2.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -187.2% | -98.3% | -10.7% | -2.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -18.9% | -93.6% | -184.6% | -2.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.24x | 0.66x | 0.04x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $4M | -$20.1B | -$53M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $32M | $21.2B | $75M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $37M | $1.0B | $23M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -3.54x | — | -23.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — VUZI and NCMI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VUZI five years ago would be worth $1,520 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $258 for MITQ. Over the past 12 months, VUZI leads with a +63.4% total return vs MVIS's -45.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NCMI at 8.2% vs MVIS's -35.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.2% | -30.8% | -25.7% | -2.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +12.7% | -45.5% | +63.4% | -25.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.4% | -73.6% | -29.6% | +26.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.4% | -95.6% | -84.8% | -85.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.4% | -66.2% | -35.7% | -71.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.6% | -35.8% | -11.0% | +8.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MITQ and NCMI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MITQ is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VUZI's 3.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NCMI currently trades 66.7% from its 52-week high vs MVIS's 35.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 2.61x | 3.40x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.66 | $1.73 | $4.29 | $5.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.42 | $0.51 | $1.71 | $2.92 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +37.3% | +35.6% | +66.7% | +66.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.1 | 50.3 | 61.1 | 58.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 254K | 5.3M | 924K | 472K |
Analyst Outlook
VUZI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MVIS as "Buy", VUZI as "Buy", NCMI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 711.7% upside for MVIS (target: $5) vs 102.2% for NCMI (target: $8). For income investors, VUZI offers the higher dividend yield at 10.10% vs NCMI's 3.26%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.00 | $6.00 | $7.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 | 5 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +10.1% | +3.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.29 | $0.12 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +6.4% |
VUZI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). NCMI leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
MITQ vs MVIS vs VUZI vs NCMI: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MITQ or MVIS or VUZI or NCMI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) is the stronger pick with 1090% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -74.
3% for MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS). Analysts rate MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MITQ or MVIS or VUZI or NCMI?
Over the past 5 years, Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) delivered a total return of -84.
8%, compared to -97. 4% for Moving iMage Technologies, Inc. (MITQ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VUZI returned -35. 7% versus MITQ's -97. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MITQ or MVIS or VUZI or NCMI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Moving iMage Technologies, Inc.
(MITQ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Vuzix Corporation's 3. 40β — meaning VUZI is approximately 362% more volatile than MITQ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 66% for MicroVision, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MITQ or MVIS or VUZI or NCMI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) is pulling ahead at 1090% versus -74.
3% for MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vuzix Corporation grew EPS 61. 1% year-over-year, compared to 23. 9% for MicroVision, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VUZI leads at 709. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MITQ or MVIS or VUZI or NCMI?
National CineMedia, Inc.
(NCMI) is the more profitable company, earning -4. 4% net margin versus -78. 6% for MicroVision, Inc. — meaning it keeps -4. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NCMI leads at -5. 7% versus -57. 4% for MVIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NCMI leads at 30. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MITQ or MVIS or VUZI or NCMI?
In this comparison, VUZI (10.
1% yield), NCMI (3. 3% yield) pay a dividend. MITQ, MVIS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is MITQ or MVIS or VUZI or NCMI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, National CineMedia, Inc.
(NCMI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26), 3. 3% yield). MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS) carries a higher beta of 2. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NCMI: -71. 0%, MVIS: -66. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MITQ and MVIS and VUZI and NCMI?
These companies operate in different sectors (MITQ (Technology) and MVIS (Technology) and VUZI (Technology) and NCMI (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MITQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MVIS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VUZI is a small-cap high-growth stock; NCMI is a small-cap income-oriented stock. VUZI, NCMI pay a dividend while MITQ, MVIS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 5%
- Gross Margin > 18%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.