REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MITT vs BX vs KKR vs TPG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
MITT vs BX vs KKR vs TPG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $249M | $95.85B | $89.45B | $17.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $493M | $13.83B | $19.26B | $4.67B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $34M | $3.02B | $2.37B | $18M |
| Gross Margin | 94.2% | 86.0% | 41.8% | 96.9% |
| Operating Margin | 93.3% | 51.9% | 2.4% | 14.7% |
| Forward P/E | 7.2x | 20.5x | 16.4x | 16.1x |
| Total Debt | $8.10B | $13.31B | $54.77B | $1.72B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $76M | $2.63B | $6M | $826M |
MITT vs BX vs KKR vs TPG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TPG Mortgage Invest… (MITT) | 100 | 74.5 | -25.5% |
| Blackstone Inc. (BX) | 100 | 92.7 | -7.3% |
| KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) | 100 | 141.0 | +41.0% |
| TPG Inc. (TPG) | 100 | 132.5 | +32.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MITT vs BX vs KKR vs TPG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MITT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 0.90, yield 10.0%, current ratio 0.09x
- Lower P/E (7.2x vs 16.1x)
- Beta 0.90 vs KKR's 1.70
- +29.0% vs KKR's -13.0%
BX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.53, Low D/E 60.8%, current ratio 0.91x
- 21.8% margin vs TPG's 4.0%
- 6.5% ROA vs TPG's 0.1%, ROIC 16.1% vs 9.3%
KKR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs BX's 476.1%
TPG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.61, yield 18.1%
- Rev growth 77.9%, EPS growth 17.8%
- NIM 0.7% vs KKR's 0.0%
- 77.9% NII/revenue growth vs KKR's -11.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 77.9% NII/revenue growth vs KKR's -11.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.2x vs 16.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.8% margin vs TPG's 4.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.90 vs KKR's 1.70 | |
| Dividends | 18.1% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KKR's 0.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.0% vs KKR's -13.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs TPG's 0.1%, ROIC 16.1% vs 9.3% |
MITT vs BX vs KKR vs TPG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MITT vs BX vs KKR vs TPG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BX leads in 2 of 6 categories
MITT leads 2 • KKR leads 1 • TPG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BX leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KKR is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.3B annually — 39.1x MITT's $493M. BX is the more profitable business, keeping 21.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TPG's 4.0%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $493M | $13.8B | $19.3B | $4.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $457M | $7.2B | $9.0B | $611M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $34M | $3.0B | $2.4B | $18M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $68M | $3.5B | $7.5B | $972M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +94.2% | +86.0% | +41.8% | +96.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +93.3% | +51.9% | +2.4% | +14.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +21.8% | +12.3% | +4.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.8% | +12.6% | +49.4% | +21.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.9% | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | +41.3% | -1.7% | — |
Valuation Metrics
MITT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.7x trailing earnings, MITT trades at a 80% valuation discount to KKR's 42.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BX's 14.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TPG's 21.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $249M | $95.8B | $89.4B | $17.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.3B | $106.5B | $144.2B | $17.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.71x | 31.53x | 42.88x | 36.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.20x | 20.50x | 16.42x | 16.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.51x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.25x | 14.77x | 20.24x | 21.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.53x | 6.93x | 4.64x | 3.65x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.43x | 4.37x | 1.17x | 1.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.18x | 54.93x | 9.39x | 16.99x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BX delivers a 14.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $0 for TPG. TPG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.42x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MITT's 14.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TPG scores 8/9 vs MITT's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.1% | +14.3% | +3.2% | +0.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +6.5% | +0.6% | +0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.5% | +16.1% | +0.3% | +9.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.5% | +16.9% | +0.1% | +7.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 14.45x | 0.61x | 0.67x | 0.42x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.0B | $10.7B | $54.8B | $896M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $76M | $2.6B | $6M | $826M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.1B | $13.3B | $54.8B | $1.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.12x | 14.12x | 3.29x | 6.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KKR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KKR five years ago would be worth $17,648 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,650 for MITT. Over the past 12 months, MITT leads with a +29.0% total return vs KKR's -13.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KKR at 27.6% vs BX's 18.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.6% | -21.3% | -22.0% | -31.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.0% | -6.5% | -13.0% | +0.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +87.9% | +65.9% | +107.7% | +82.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.5% | +59.0% | +76.5% | +50.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.9% | +476.1% | +715.5% | +50.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.4% | +18.4% | +27.6% | +22.1% |
Risk & Volatility
MITT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MITT is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KKR's 1.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MITT currently trades 84.6% from its 52-week high vs TPG's 63.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 1.53x | 1.70x | 1.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.27 | $190.09 | $153.87 | $70.38 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.52 | $101.73 | $82.67 | $36.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.6% | +64.3% | +65.2% | +63.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.5 | 54.8 | 52.4 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 277K | 7.1M | 6.5M | 3.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KKR and TPG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MITT as "Buy", BX as "Buy", KKR as "Buy", TPG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 46.1% upside for TPG (target: $65) vs 22.8% for MITT (target: $10). For income investors, TPG offers the higher dividend yield at 18.08% vs KKR's 0.80%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.63 | $156.29 | $143.00 | $65.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 29 | 26 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +10.0% | +6.3% | +0.8% | +18.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 6 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.79 | $7.70 | $0.80 | $8.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
BX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MITT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
MITT vs BX vs KKR vs TPG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MITT or BX or KKR or TPG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TPG Inc.
(TPG) is the stronger pick with 77. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 0% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT) offers the better valuation at 8. 7x trailing P/E (7. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MITT or BX or KKR or TPG?
On trailing P/E, TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT) is the cheapest at 8.
7x versus KKR & Co. Inc. at 42. 9x. On forward P/E, TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc is actually cheaper at 7. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MITT or BX or KKR or TPG?
Over the past 5 years, KKR & Co.
Inc. (KKR) delivered a total return of +76. 5%, compared to -3. 5% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KKR returned +715. 5% versus MITT's -16. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MITT or BX or KKR or TPG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
90β versus KKR & Co. Inc. 's 1. 70β — meaning KKR is approximately 89% more volatile than MITT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TPG Inc. (TPG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 42% versus 14% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MITT or BX or KKR or TPG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TPG Inc.
(TPG) is pulling ahead at 77. 9% versus -11. 0% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TPG Inc. grew EPS 1779% year-over-year, compared to -28. 7% for KKR & Co. Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MITT or BX or KKR or TPG?
Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 8% net margin versus 4. 0% for TPG Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MITT leads at 96. 9% versus 2. 4% for KKR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TPG leads at 96. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MITT or BX or KKR or TPG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT) trades at 7.
2x forward P/E versus 20. 5x for Blackstone Inc. — 13. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPG: 46. 1% to $65. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MITT or BX or KKR or TPG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
TPG Inc. (TPG) offers the highest yield at 18. 1%, versus 0. 8% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR).
09Is MITT or BX or KKR or TPG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
90), 10. 0% yield). TPG Inc. (TPG) carries a higher beta of 1. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MITT: -16. 9%, TPG: +50. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MITT and BX and KKR and TPG?
These companies operate in different sectors (MITT (Real Estate) and BX (Financial Services) and KKR (Financial Services) and TPG (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MITT is a small-cap deep-value stock; BX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; KKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TPG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.