Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MKC vs HRL vs SJM vs PPC vs ADM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
Agricultural Farm Products
MKC vs HRL vs SJM vs PPC vs ADM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Agricultural Farm Products |
| Market Cap | $12.14B | $11.41B | $10.58B | $7.23B | $37.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.84B | $12.14B | $8.93B | $18.57B | $80.61B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $789M | $489M | $-1.26B | $888M | $1.08B |
| Gross Margin | 37.9% | 15.5% | 33.6% | 11.6% | 5.8% |
| Operating Margin | 15.7% | 6.0% | -8.0% | 7.4% | 1.5% |
| Forward P/E | 15.5x | 14.1x | 11.0x | 8.1x | 18.6x |
| Total Debt | $4.00B | $2.86B | $7.76B | $3.35B | $8.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $96M | $671M | $70M | $640M | $1.01B |
MKC vs HRL vs SJM vs PPC vs ADM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| McCormick & Company… (MKC) | 100 | 54.7 | -45.3% |
| Hormel Foods Corpor… (HRL) | 100 | 42.5 | -57.5% |
| The J. M. Smucker C… (SJM) | 100 | 87.3 | -12.7% |
| Pilgrim's Pride Cor… (PPC) | 100 | 147.1 | +47.1% |
| Archer-Daniels-Midl… (ADM) | 100 | 197.2 | +97.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MKC vs HRL vs SJM vs PPC vs ADM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MKC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 1.7%, EPS growth 0.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.5%
- 11.5% margin vs SJM's -14.1%
Among these 5 stocks, HRL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SJM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 6.7% revenue growth vs ADM's -6.2%
PPC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.02, yield 27.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.02, Low D/E 90.8%, current ratio 1.47x
- PEG 0.13 vs MKC's 14.63
- Beta 0.02, yield 27.5%, current ratio 1.47x
ADM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 147.4% 10Y total return vs PPC's 52.1%
- +66.2% vs MKC's -33.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.7% revenue growth vs ADM's -6.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 11.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.5% margin vs SJM's -14.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs HRL's 0.15 | |
| Dividends | 27.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs HRL's 5.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +66.2% vs MKC's -33.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.7% ROA vs SJM's -7.7%, ROIC 20.0% vs -3.4% |
MKC vs HRL vs SJM vs PPC vs ADM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MKC vs HRL vs SJM vs PPC vs ADM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PPC leads in 2 of 6 categories
MKC leads 1 • HRL leads 0 • SJM leads 0 • ADM leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MKC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADM is the larger business by revenue, generating $80.6B annually — 11.8x MKC's $6.8B. MKC is the more profitable business, keeping 11.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SJM's -14.1%. On growth, SJM holds the edge at +7.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.8B | $12.1B | $8.9B | $18.6B | $80.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.3B | $932M | -$595M | $1.8B | $3.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $789M | $489M | -$1.3B | $888M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $879M | $578M | $971M | $773M | $4.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.9% | +15.5% | +33.6% | +11.6% | +5.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | +6.0% | -8.0% | +7.4% | +1.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +4.0% | -14.1% | +4.8% | +1.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.8% | +4.8% | +10.9% | +4.2% | +6.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | +1.3% | +7.0% | +1.6% | +1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.0% | +6.5% | -9.3% | -65.3% | +1.6% |
Valuation Metrics
PPC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.7x trailing earnings, PPC trades at a 81% valuation discount to ADM's 34.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PPC offers better value at 0.11x vs MKC's 15.47x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.1B | $11.4B | $10.6B | $7.2B | $37.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16.0B | $13.6B | $18.3B | $9.9B | $44.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.35x | 23.84x | -8.59x | 6.70x | 34.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.46x | 14.13x | 11.01x | 8.05x | 18.63x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 15.47x | — | — | 0.11x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.12x | 13.84x | — | 4.81x | 17.18x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.78x | 0.94x | 1.21x | 0.39x | 0.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.24x | 1.44x | 1.74x | 1.96x | 1.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.40x | 21.36x | 12.96x | 10.95x | 8.89x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PPC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PPC delivers a 24.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-24 for SJM. HRL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SJM's 1.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MKC scores 6/9 vs PPC's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.7% | +4.3% | -24.0% | +24.1% | +4.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.0% | +3.7% | -7.7% | +8.7% | +2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.5% | +5.3% | -3.4% | +20.0% | +3.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.7% | +6.0% | -4.3% | +20.8% | +4.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.69x | 0.36x | 1.28x | 0.91x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.9B | $2.2B | $7.7B | $2.7B | $7.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $96M | $671M | $70M | $640M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.0B | $2.9B | $7.8B | $3.4B | $8.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.65x | 6.44x | -1.88x | 8.87x | 3.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — PPC and ADM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PPC five years ago would be worth $16,053 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,569 for HRL. Over the past 12 months, ADM leads with a +66.2% total return vs MKC's -33.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PPC at 19.6% vs HRL's -15.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -28.1% | -8.8% | +4.0% | -23.8% | +32.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -33.6% | -24.7% | -7.5% | -30.5% | +66.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.8% | -40.5% | -28.5% | +71.1% | +10.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.2% | -44.3% | -12.0% | +60.5% | +29.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.9% | -23.9% | +5.6% | +52.1% | +147.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.6% | -15.9% | -10.6% | +19.6% | +3.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MKC and ADM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MKC is the less volatile stock with a -0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HRL's 0.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ADM currently trades 94.8% from its 52-week high vs PPC's 59.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.03x | 0.15x | 0.04x | 0.02x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $78.16 | $31.86 | $119.39 | $51.45 | $81.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $47.31 | $20.32 | $88.25 | $30.22 | $46.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.3% | +65.1% | +83.3% | +59.1% | +94.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.8 | 39.5 | 50.1 | 35.9 | 68.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.0M | 4.2M | 2.1M | 1.1M | 3.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HRL and PPC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MKC as "Hold", HRL as "Hold", SJM as "Hold", PPC as "Hold", ADM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 52.8% upside for MKC (target: $73) vs -22.6% for ADM (target: $60). For income investors, PPC offers the higher dividend yield at 27.51% vs ADM's 2.63%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $73.20 | $27.25 | $113.38 | $46.00 | $60.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 30 | 29 | 29 | 21 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.7% | +5.5% | +4.3% | +27.5% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 27 | 34 | 15 | 1 | 31 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.79 | $1.15 | $4.28 | $8.36 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PPC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). MKC leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.
MKC vs HRL vs SJM vs PPC vs ADM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MKC or HRL or SJM or PPC or ADM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The J.
M. Smucker Company (SJM) is the stronger pick with 6. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 2% for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) offers the better valuation at 6. 7x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) a "Hold" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MKC or HRL or SJM or PPC or ADM?
On trailing P/E, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) is the cheapest at 6.
7x versus Archer-Daniels-Midland Company at 34. 8x. On forward P/E, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Pilgrim's Pride Corporation wins at 0. 13x versus McCormick & Company, Incorporated's 14. 63x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MKC or HRL or SJM or PPC or ADM?
Over the past 5 years, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) delivered a total return of +60.
5%, compared to -44. 3% for Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ADM returned +147. 4% versus HRL's -23. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MKC or HRL or SJM or PPC or ADM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
03β versus Hormel Foods Corporation's 0. 15β — meaning HRL is approximately -645% more volatile than MKC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 128% for The J. M. Smucker Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MKC or HRL or SJM or PPC or ADM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The J.
M. Smucker Company (SJM) is pulling ahead at 6. 7% versus -6. 2% for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: McCormick & Company, Incorporated grew EPS 0. 3% year-over-year, compared to -262. 3% for The J. M. Smucker Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, SJM leads at 2. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MKC or HRL or SJM or PPC or ADM?
McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) is the more profitable company, earning 11.
5% net margin versus -14. 1% for The J. M. Smucker Company — meaning it keeps 11. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MKC leads at 16. 0% versus -7. 7% for SJM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SJM leads at 38. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MKC or HRL or SJM or PPC or ADM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 13x versus McCormick & Company, Incorporated's 14. 63x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 18. 6x for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company — 10. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MKC: 52. 8% to $73. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — MKC or HRL or SJM or PPC or ADM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) offers the highest yield at 27. 5%, versus 2. 6% for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM).
09Is MKC or HRL or SJM or PPC or ADM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
03), 3. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MKC: +26. 9%, HRL: -23. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MKC and HRL and SJM and PPC and ADM?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MKC is a mid-cap deep-value stock; HRL is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; SJM is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; PPC is a small-cap deep-value stock; ADM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.