MKC vs MDLZ

For growth investors, Mondelez International, Inc.

(MDLZ) is the stronger pick with 5. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 7% for McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC). McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) offers the better valuation at 16. 5x trailing P/E (15. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) a "Buy" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) is the cheapest at 16.

5x versus Mondelez International, Inc. at 32. 7x. On forward P/E, McCormick & Company, Incorporated is actually cheaper at 15. 7x.

Over the past 5 years, Mondelez International, Inc.

(MDLZ) delivered a total return of +13. 7%, compared to -37. 2% for McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MDLZ returned +71. 0% versus MKC's +30. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

03β versus Mondelez International, Inc. 's 0. 06β — meaning MDLZ is approximately -310% more volatile than MKC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 69% versus 87% for Mondelez International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mondelez International, Inc.

(MDLZ) is pulling ahead at 5. 8% versus 1. 7% for McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: McCormick & Company, Incorporated grew EPS 0. 3% year-over-year, compared to -44. 7% for Mondelez International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MDLZ leads at 7. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) is the more profitable company, earning 11.

5% net margin versus 6. 4% for Mondelez International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MKC leads at 16. 0% versus 9. 4% for MDLZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MKC leads at 37. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) trades at 15.

7x forward P/E versus 20. 2x for Mondelez International, Inc. — 4. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MKC: 51. 0% to $73. 20.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) offers the highest yield at 3. 7%, versus 3. 1% for Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ).

For long-horizon retirement investors, McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

03), 3. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MKC: +30. 1%, MDLZ: +71. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MKC is a mid-cap deep-value stock; MDLZ is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.