Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MKL vs LRE vs GLRE vs AIG vs RNR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Real Estate - Development
Insurance - Reinsurance
Insurance - Diversified
Insurance - Reinsurance
MKL vs LRE vs GLRE vs AIG vs RNR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Real Estate - Development | Insurance - Reinsurance | Insurance - Diversified | Insurance - Reinsurance |
| Market Cap | $22.08B | $18M | $608M | $42.10B | $13.03B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16.57B | $36.91B | $706M | $26.65B | $11.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.77B | $1.12B | $81M | $3.16B | $3.09B |
| Gross Margin | 61.4% | 16.4% | 38.9% | 38.5% | 44.6% |
| Operating Margin | 13.9% | 5.0% | 6.7% | 15.0% | 35.5% |
| Forward P/E | 15.7x | 4.4x | 8.9x | 10.0x | 7.7x |
| Total Debt | $4.30B | $11.60B | $7M | $9.19B | $2.33B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.96B | $1.30B | $644M | $1.27B | $1.73B |
MKL vs LRE vs GLRE vs AIG vs RNR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Markel Corporation (MKL) | 100 | 119.9 | +19.9% |
| Lead Real Estate Co… (LRE) | 100 | 26.7 | -73.3% |
| Greenlight Capital … (GLRE) | 100 | 166.7 | +66.7% |
| American Internatio… (AIG) | 100 | 129.5 | +29.5% |
| RenaissanceRe Holdi… (RNR) | 100 | 152.6 | +52.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MKL vs LRE vs GLRE vs AIG vs RNR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MKL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.44, yield 2.8%
- 2.8% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs LRE's 0.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
LRE is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 6.5% ROA vs AIG's 1.9%, ROIC 4.8% vs 5.9%
GLRE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.40, Low D/E 1.0%, current ratio 0.45x
- PEG 0.11 vs MKL's 0.63
- Lower P/E (8.9x vs 10.0x)
- Beta 0.40 vs LRE's 0.84, lower leverage
AIG is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.40, yield 2.2%, current ratio 0.85x
RNR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 9.4%, EPS growth 60.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 36.2%
- 182.6% 10Y total return vs MKL's 88.3%
- 9.4% revenue growth vs AIG's -1.8%
- 26.9% margin vs LRE's 3.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.4% revenue growth vs AIG's -1.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 10.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.9% margin vs LRE's 3.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.40 vs LRE's 0.84, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs LRE's 0.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.5% vs MKL's -5.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs AIG's 1.9%, ROIC 4.8% vs 5.9% |
MKL vs LRE vs GLRE vs AIG vs RNR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MKL vs LRE vs GLRE vs AIG vs RNR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RNR leads in 2 of 6 categories
GLRE leads 2 • MKL leads 1 • LRE leads 0 • AIG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RNR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LRE is the larger business by revenue, generating $36.9B annually — 52.2x GLRE's $706M. RNR is the more profitable business, keeping 26.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LRE's 3.0%. On growth, LRE holds the edge at +19.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16.6B | $36.9B | $706M | $26.6B | $11.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.5B | $2.0B | $51M | $6.6B | $4.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.8B | $1.1B | $81M | $3.2B | $3.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.2B | -$2.8B | $237M | $3.5B | $4.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.4% | +16.4% | +38.9% | +38.5% | +44.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.9% | +5.0% | +6.7% | +15.0% | +35.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +3.0% | +11.5% | +11.9% | +26.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | -7.5% | +33.6% | +13.2% | +36.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.7% | +19.9% | +5.6% | -1.8% | -36.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | +44.9% | +22.1% | +81.9% | +100.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LRE and GLRE each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.4x trailing earnings, LRE trades at a 70% valuation discount to AIG's 14.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GLRE offers better value at 0.10x vs MKL's 0.42x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $22.1B | $18M | $608M | $42.1B | $13.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $22.4B | $83M | -$28M | $50.0B | $13.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.43x | 4.39x | 8.25x | 14.45x | 5.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.68x | — | 8.93x | 10.02x | 7.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.42x | — | 0.10x | — | 0.18x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.63x | 13.09x | -0.34x | 6.82x | 3.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.33x | 0.15x | 0.87x | 1.57x | 1.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.18x | 0.65x | 0.87x | 1.09x | 0.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.65x | — | 2.89x | 12.70x | 3.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GLRE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LRE delivers a 26.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $8 for AIG. GLRE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LRE's 2.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RNR scores 8/9 vs LRE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.6% | +26.5% | +11.7% | +7.7% | +16.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | +6.5% | +3.7% | +1.9% | +5.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.7% | +4.8% | +16.7% | +5.9% | +16.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.9% | +10.1% | +6.0% | +6.5% | +10.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 2.74x | 0.01x | 0.22x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $339M | $10.3B | -$636M | $7.9B | $598M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4.0B | $1.3B | $644M | $1.3B | $1.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.3B | $11.6B | $7M | $9.2B | $2.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.00x | 49.14x | 15.78x | 10.67x | 33.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GLRE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GLRE five years ago would be worth $19,520 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,211 for LRE. Over the past 12 months, GLRE leads with a +34.5% total return vs MKL's -5.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GLRE at 20.9% vs LRE's -39.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.2% | -25.1% | +26.4% | -6.3% | +11.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -5.5% | +10.1% | +34.5% | -3.3% | +23.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.5% | -77.9% | +76.5% | +54.9% | +48.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.9% | -77.9% | +95.2% | +75.7% | +86.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.3% | -77.9% | -14.4% | +68.3% | +182.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.3% | -39.5% | +20.9% | +15.7% | +14.1% |
Risk & Volatility
RNR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RNR is the less volatile stock with a -0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LRE's 0.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RNR currently trades 94.9% from its 52-week high vs LRE's 44.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.44x | 0.84x | 0.40x | 0.40x | -0.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2207.59 | $2.97 | $19.39 | $87.46 | $318.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1719.41 | $1.00 | $11.57 | $71.25 | $231.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.9% | +44.1% | +92.3% | +89.7% | +94.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 27.1 | 50.1 | 45.4 | 54.6 | 46.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 58K | 16K | 198K | 4.1M | 311K |
Analyst Outlook
MKL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MKL as "Hold", GLRE as "Buy", AIG as "Hold", RNR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 10.5% upside for MKL (target: $1950) vs 2.1% for RNR (target: $308). For income investors, MKL offers the higher dividend yield at 2.75% vs RNR's 0.55%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1950.00 | — | — | $85.63 | $308.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | — | 3 | 41 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | +0.9% | — | +2.2% | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $48.55 | $1.87 | — | $1.71 | $1.67 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.9% | 0.0% | +1.6% | +13.9% | +12.3% |
RNR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). GLRE leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
MKL vs LRE vs GLRE vs AIG vs RNR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MKL or LRE or GLRE or AIG or RNR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the stronger pick with 9. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 8% for American International Group, Inc. (AIG). Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE) offers the better valuation at 4. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd. (GLRE) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MKL or LRE or GLRE or AIG or RNR?
On trailing P/E, Lead Real Estate Co.
, Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE) is the cheapest at 4. 4x versus American International Group, Inc. at 14. 5x. On forward P/E, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. is actually cheaper at 7. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd. wins at 0. 11x versus Markel Corporation's 0. 63x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MKL or LRE or GLRE or AIG or RNR?
Over the past 5 years, Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd.
(GLRE) delivered a total return of +95. 2%, compared to -77. 9% for Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RNR returned +182. 6% versus LRE's -77. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MKL or LRE or GLRE or AIG or RNR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 03β versus Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares's 0. 84β — meaning LRE is approximately -2742% more volatile than RNR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd. (GLRE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MKL or LRE or GLRE or AIG or RNR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is pulling ahead at 9. 4% versus -1. 8% for American International Group, Inc. (AIG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd. grew EPS 75. 0% year-over-year, compared to -15. 1% for Markel Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, RNR leads at 36. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MKL or LRE or GLRE or AIG or RNR?
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 0% net margin versus 3. 3% for Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares — meaning it keeps 21. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RNR leads at 31. 5% versus 4. 7% for LRE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MKL leads at 69. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MKL or LRE or GLRE or AIG or RNR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd. (GLRE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 11x versus Markel Corporation's 0. 63x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) trades at 7. 7x forward P/E versus 15. 7x for Markel Corporation — 8. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MKL: 10. 5% to $1950. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MKL or LRE or GLRE or AIG or RNR?
In this comparison, MKL (2.
8% yield), AIG (2. 2% yield), LRE (0. 9% yield), RNR (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. GLRE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MKL or LRE or GLRE or AIG or RNR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 03), 0. 6% yield, +182. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RNR: +182. 6%, GLRE: -14. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MKL and LRE and GLRE and AIG and RNR?
These companies operate in different sectors (MKL (Financial Services) and LRE (Real Estate) and GLRE (Financial Services) and AIG (Financial Services) and RNR (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
MKL, LRE, AIG, RNR pay a dividend while GLRE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.