Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MKTW vs CSGP vs MMYT vs OPEN vs MSCI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MKTW
MarketWise, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$44M
5Y Perf.-91.6%
CSGP
CoStar Group, Inc.

Real Estate - Services

Real EstateNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$14.83B
5Y Perf.-58.8%
MMYT
MakeMyTrip Limited

Travel Services

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • IN
Market Cap$4.52B
5Y Perf.+228.8%
OPEN
Opendoor Technologies Inc.

Real Estate - Services

Real EstateNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.08B
5Y Perf.-72.0%
MSCI
MSCI Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$42.83B
5Y Perf.+64.9%

MKTW vs CSGP vs MMYT vs OPEN vs MSCI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MKTW logoMKTW
CSGP logoCSGP
MMYT logoMMYT
OPEN logoOPEN
MSCI logoMSCI
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationReal Estate - ServicesTravel ServicesReal Estate - ServicesFinancial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Market Cap$44M$14.83B$4.52B$4.08B$42.83B
Revenue (TTM)$321M$3.41B$1.04B$3.94B$3.13B
Net Income (TTM)$4M$25M$57M$-1.39B$1.32B
Gross Margin86.2%77.4%73.4%7.9%82.4%
Operating Margin14.1%-0.8%14.1%-9.9%54.7%
Forward P/E7.2x25.8x73.2x30.0x
Total Debt$6M$1.14B$237M$193M$6.31B
Cash & Equiv.$70M$1.73B$509M$962M$515M

MKTW vs CSGP vs MMYT vs OPEN vs MSCILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MKTW
CSGP
MMYT
OPEN
MSCI
StockSep 20May 26Return
MarketWise, Inc. (MKTW)1008.4-91.6%
CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP)10041.2-58.8%
MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT)100328.8+228.8%
Opendoor Technologi… (OPEN)10028.0-72.0%
MSCI Inc. (MSCI)100164.9+64.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MKTW vs CSGP vs MMYT vs OPEN vs MSCI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MKTW leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. MSCI Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. MMYT and OPEN also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
MKTW
MarketWise, Inc.
The Income Pick

MKTW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.37, yield 11.8%
  • Beta 0.37, yield 11.8%, current ratio 0.56x
  • Lower P/E (7.2x vs 30.0x)
  • Beta 0.37 vs OPEN's 3.09
Best for: income & stability and defensive
CSGP
CoStar Group, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

CSGP is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 13.7%, current ratio 2.84x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
MMYT
MakeMyTrip Limited
The Growth Play

MMYT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 25.0%, EPS growth -54.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 47.7%
  • 25.0% revenue growth vs MKTW's -19.7%
Best for: growth exposure
OPEN
Opendoor Technologies Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

OPEN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +5.1% vs MMYT's -54.9%
Best for: momentum
MSCI
MSCI Inc.
The Banking Pick

MSCI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 7.2% 10Y total return vs MMYT's 190.1%
  • 38.4% margin vs OPEN's -35.2%
  • 24.0% ROA vs OPEN's -53.6%, ROIC 34.9% vs -15.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMMYT logoMMYT25.0% revenue growth vs MKTW's -19.7%
ValueMKTW logoMKTWLower P/E (7.2x vs 30.0x)
Quality / MarginsMSCI logoMSCI38.4% margin vs OPEN's -35.2%
Stability / SafetyMKTW logoMKTWBeta 0.37 vs OPEN's 3.09
DividendsMKTW logoMKTW11.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs MSCI's 1.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)OPEN logoOPEN+5.1% vs MMYT's -54.9%
Efficiency (ROA)MSCI logoMSCI24.0% ROA vs OPEN's -53.6%, ROIC 34.9% vs -15.8%

MKTW vs CSGP vs MMYT vs OPEN vs MSCI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MKTWMarketWise, Inc.
FY 2025
Subscription and Circulation
100.0%$323M
Advertising
0.0%$45,000
CSGPCoStar Group, Inc.
FY 2024
CoStar Suite
61.1%$1.0B
LoopNet
16.9%$282M
Information services
8.1%$136M
Online Marketplaces
7.8%$130M
Residential
6.0%$101M
MMYTMakeMyTrip Limited
FY 2025
Hotels And Packages
59.1%$520M
Air Ticketing
27.4%$242M
Bus Ticketing
13.5%$119M
OPENOpendoor Technologies Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

MSCIMSCI Inc.
FY 2025
Index
64.3%$1.8B
Analytics
25.7%$714M
All Other Segments
10.0%$279M

MKTW vs CSGP vs MMYT vs OPEN vs MSCI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMSCILAGGINGMMYT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MSCI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

OPEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.9B annually — 12.3x MKTW's $321M. MSCI is the more profitable business, keeping 38.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OPEN's -35.2%. On growth, CSGP holds the edge at +22.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMKTW logoMKTWMarketWise, Inc.CSGP logoCSGPCoStar Group, Inc.MMYT logoMMYTMakeMyTrip LimitedOPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…MSCI logoMSCIMSCI Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$321M$3.4B$1.0B$3.9B$3.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$47M$278M$175M-$363M$2.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$4M$25M$57M-$1.4B$1.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$43M$241M$224M$1.1B$1.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+86.2%+77.4%+73.4%+7.9%+82.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+14.1%-0.8%+14.1%-9.9%+54.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+1.3%+0.7%+5.5%-35.2%+38.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+13.3%+7.1%+21.5%+27.2%+49.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-8.5%+22.5%+10.6%-37.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-156.1%+127.7%-68.3%-50.0%+49.1%
MSCI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MKTW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 7.2x trailing earnings, MKTW trades at a 100% valuation discount to CSGP's 2107.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MSCI's 25.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CSGP's 83.7x.

MetricMKTW logoMKTWMarketWise, Inc.CSGP logoCSGPCoStar Group, Inc.MMYT logoMMYTMakeMyTrip LimitedOPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…MSCI logoMSCIMSCI Inc.
Market CapShares × price$44M$14.8B$4.5B$4.1B$42.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$20M$14.2B$4.3B$3.3B$48.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS7.20x2107.23x60.86x-3.13x37.81x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.25.84x73.17x29.99x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.23x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple-0.31x83.74x28.92x25.17x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.13x4.57x4.62x0.93x13.67x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.77x4.79x4.06x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF0.96x361.59x26.07x3.93x27.65x
MKTW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MSCI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

MMYT delivers a 8.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-163 for OPEN. CSGP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MMYT's 0.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MSCI scores 8/9 vs MKTW's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricMKTW logoMKTWMarketWise, Inc.CSGP logoCSGPCoStar Group, Inc.MMYT logoMMYTMakeMyTrip LimitedOPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…MSCI logoMSCIMSCI Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+0.3%+8.2%-163.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.0%+0.2%+3.1%-53.6%+24.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital-0.9%+9.2%-15.8%+34.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-0.8%+9.2%-11.7%+44.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–945658
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.14x0.20x0.19x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$64M-$589M-$272M-$769M$5.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$70M$1.7B$509M$962M$515M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$6M$1.1B$237M$193M$6.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.58x1.67x-8.92x7.67x
MSCI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

OPEN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MMYT five years ago would be worth $19,700 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,170 for MKTW. Over the past 12 months, OPEN leads with a +510.1% total return vs MMYT's -54.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OPEN at 37.4% vs CSGP's -22.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMKTW logoMKTWMarketWise, Inc.CSGP logoCSGPCoStar Group, Inc.MMYT logoMMYTMakeMyTrip LimitedOPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…MSCI logoMSCIMSCI Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+13.5%-46.7%-38.3%-12.4%+4.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+32.6%-53.6%-54.9%+510.1%+7.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-27.4%-52.9%+97.5%+159.5%+28.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-88.3%-58.9%+97.0%-71.6%+27.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-88.2%+77.5%+190.1%-50.8%+720.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-10.1%-22.2%+25.5%+37.4%+8.7%
OPEN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MKTW and MSCI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MKTW is the less volatile stock with a 0.37 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPEN's 3.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSCI currently trades 93.9% from its 52-week high vs CSGP's 35.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMKTW logoMKTWMarketWise, Inc.CSGP logoCSGPCoStar Group, Inc.MMYT logoMMYTMakeMyTrip LimitedOPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…MSCI logoMSCIMSCI Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.37x0.80x1.17x3.09x0.61x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$21.74$97.43$113.85$10.87$626.28
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$13.37$33.31$32.84$0.51$501.08
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+76.5%+35.9%+44.4%+48.9%+93.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.130.459.456.254.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded26K5.9M1.5M36.3M520K
Evenly matched — MKTW and MSCI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — MKTW and MSCI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MKTW as "Hold", CSGP as "Buy", MMYT as "Buy", OPEN as "Hold", MSCI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 80.2% upside for MMYT (target: $91) vs -79.0% for MKTW (target: $4). For income investors, MKTW offers the higher dividend yield at 11.79% vs MSCI's 1.22%.

MetricMKTW logoMKTWMarketWise, Inc.CSGP logoCSGPCoStar Group, Inc.MMYT logoMMYTMakeMyTrip LimitedOPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…MSCI logoMSCIMSCI Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$3.50$61.91$91.00$6.50$674.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts725112627
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+11.8%+1.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises111
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.96$7.20
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+7.7%+3.9%+0.5%0.0%+5.8%
Evenly matched — MKTW and MSCI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

MSCI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MKTW leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallMSCI Inc. (MSCI)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MKTW vs CSGP vs MMYT vs OPEN vs MSCI: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MKTW or CSGP or MMYT or OPEN or MSCI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) is the stronger pick with 25.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 7% for MarketWise, Inc. (MKTW). MarketWise, Inc. (MKTW) offers the better valuation at 7. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MKTW or CSGP or MMYT or OPEN or MSCI?

On trailing P/E, MarketWise, Inc.

(MKTW) is the cheapest at 7. 2x versus CoStar Group, Inc. at 2107. 2x. On forward P/E, CoStar Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 25. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MKTW or CSGP or MMYT or OPEN or MSCI?

Over the past 5 years, MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) delivered a total return of +97.

0%, compared to -88. 3% for MarketWise, Inc. (MKTW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSCI returned +720. 9% versus MKTW's -88. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MKTW or CSGP or MMYT or OPEN or MSCI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MarketWise, Inc.

(MKTW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 37β versus Opendoor Technologies Inc. 's 3. 09β — meaning OPEN is approximately 733% more volatile than MKTW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 20% for MakeMyTrip Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MKTW or CSGP or MMYT or OPEN or MSCI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) is pulling ahead at 25.

0% versus -19. 7% for MarketWise, Inc. (MKTW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MSCI Inc. grew EPS 10. 7% year-over-year, compared to -203. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MMYT leads at 47. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MKTW or CSGP or MMYT or OPEN or MSCI?

MSCI Inc.

(MSCI) is the more profitable company, earning 38. 4% net margin versus -29. 7% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 38. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSCI leads at 54. 7% versus -6. 2% for OPEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MKTW leads at 85. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MKTW or CSGP or MMYT or OPEN or MSCI more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, CoStar Group, Inc.

(CSGP) trades at 25. 8x forward P/E versus 73. 2x for MakeMyTrip Limited — 47. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MMYT: 80. 2% to $91. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MKTW or CSGP or MMYT or OPEN or MSCI?

In this comparison, MKTW (11.

8% yield), MSCI (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. CSGP, MMYT, OPEN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is MKTW or CSGP or MMYT or OPEN or MSCI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, MSCI Inc.

(MSCI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 61), 1. 2% yield, +720. 9% 10Y return). Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) carries a higher beta of 3. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSCI: +720. 9%, OPEN: -50. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MKTW and CSGP and MMYT and OPEN and MSCI?

These companies operate in different sectors (MKTW (Technology) and CSGP (Real Estate) and MMYT (Consumer Cyclical) and OPEN (Real Estate) and MSCI (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MKTW is a small-cap deep-value stock; CSGP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MMYT is a small-cap high-growth stock; OPEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MSCI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MKTW, MSCI pay a dividend while CSGP, MMYT, OPEN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MKTW

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 51%
  • Dividend Yield > 4.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CSGP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Gross Margin > 46%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MMYT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

OPEN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MSCI

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MKTW and CSGP and MMYT and OPEN and MSCI on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MKTW: -8.5% · CSGP: 22.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(MKTW: 7.2x · CSGP: 2107.2x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.