MLCO
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Market Cap$2.22B
5Y Perf.-65.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
MLCO vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
Specialty Retail
Market Cap$2.96T
5Y Perf.+125.1%
MLCO vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | MLCO | AMZN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $2.22B | $2.96T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.16B | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $185M | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 36.8% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | 11.6% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 10.7x | 35.3x |
| Total Debt | $7.02B | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.02B | $86.81B |
MLCO vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
MLCO
AMZN
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Melco Resorts & Ent… (MLCO) | 100 | 34.1 | -65.9% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 225.1 | +125.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MLCO vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: AMZN leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MLCO
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited
The Income Pick
MLCO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.11, yield 0.0%
- Rev growth 11.3%, EPS growth 350.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 56.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.11, current ratio 1.07x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs MLCO's -32.3%
- 12.4% revenue growth vs MLCO's 11.3%
- 12.2% margin vs MLCO's 3.6%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | AMZN | 12.4% revenue growth vs MLCO's 11.3% |
| Value | MLCO | Lower P/E (10.7x vs 35.3x) |
| Quality / Margins | AMZN | 12.2% margin vs MLCO's 3.6% |
| Stability / Safety | MLCO | Beta 1.11 vs AMZN's 1.51 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | AMZN | +48.6% vs MLCO's -0.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AMZN | 11.5% ROA vs MLCO's 2.4%, ROIC 14.7% vs 8.6% |
MLCO vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
MLCO vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLAMZNLAGGINGMLCO
MLCOMelco Resorts & Enter…
1leads
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs MLCOMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
MLCO5/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
AMZN4/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
AMZN6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MLCO and AMZN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 143.9x MLCO's $5.2B. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MLCO's 3.6%. On growth, AMZN holds the edge at +16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | MLCOMelco Resorts & E… | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.2B | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.1B | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $185M | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.8% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.6% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.2% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.6% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.1% | +74.8% |
Evenly matched — MLCO and AMZN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
MLCO leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, MLCO trades at a 68% valuation discount to AMZN's 38.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MLCO's 7.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMZN's 20.7x.
| Metric | MLCOMelco Resorts & E… | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $2.96T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.2B | $3.02T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.13x | 38.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.72x | 35.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.37x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.20x | 20.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.43x | 4.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 7.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.66x | 384.26x |
MLCO leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MLCO scores 8/9 vs AMZN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | MLCOMelco Resorts & E… | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.4% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.6% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.1% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6.0B | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.0B | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.0B | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.30x | 39.96x |
AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,632 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,969 for MLCO. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +48.6% total return vs MLCO's -0.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 37.5% vs MLCO's -24.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MLCOMelco Resorts & E… | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -27.3% | +21.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -0.7% | +48.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.0% | +159.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.3% | +66.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.3% | +715.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.5% | +37.5% |
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MLCO and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MLCO is the less volatile stock with a 1.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs MLCO's 53.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | MLCOMelco Resorts & E… | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.11x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.15 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.22 | $183.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.8% | +98.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.2 | 80.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 45.6M |
Evenly matched — MLCO and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MLCO as "Buy" and AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 74.0% upside for MLCO (target: $10) vs 11.6% for AMZN (target: $307).
| Metric | MLCOMelco Resorts & E… | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.50 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.00 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.5% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
AMZN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). MLCO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallAmazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
MLCO vs AMZN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MLCO or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger pick with 12. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 11. 3% for Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO). Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (10. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MLCO or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO) is the cheapest at 12.
1x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 38. 3x. On forward P/E, Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited is actually cheaper at 10. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MLCO or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +66. 3%, compared to -70. 3% for Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +715. 9% versus MLCO's -32. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MLCO or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
11β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 36% more volatile than MLCO relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — MLCO or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is pulling ahead at 12. 4% versus 11. 3% for Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited grew EPS 350. 0% year-over-year, compared to 29. 7% for Amazon. com, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MLCO leads at 56. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MLCO or AMZN?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus 3. 6% for Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MLCO leads at 11. 6% versus 11. 2% for AMZN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMZN leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MLCO or AMZN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO) trades at 10.
7x forward P/E versus 35. 3x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 24. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MLCO: 74. 0% to $9. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — MLCO or AMZN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is MLCO or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+715. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMZN: +715. 9%, MLCO: -32. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MLCO and AMZN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MLCO is a small-cap deep-value stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(MLCO: 8.6% · AMZN: 16.6%)Net Margin>
%
(MLCO: 3.6% · AMZN: 12.2%)P/E Ratio<
x
(MLCO: 12.1x · AMZN: 38.3x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.