Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MLCO vs BYD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
MLCO vs BYD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $2.28B | $6.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.16B | $4.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $185M | $1.84B |
| Gross Margin | 36.8% | 42.1% |
| Operating Margin | 11.6% | 21.4% |
| Forward P/E | 11.0x | 11.9x |
| Total Debt | $7.02B | $3.27B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.02B | $353M |
MLCO vs BYD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Melco Resorts & Ent… (MLCO) | 100 | 34.9 | -65.1% |
| Boyd Gaming Corpora… (BYD) | 100 | 398.6 | +298.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MLCO vs BYD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MLCO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 11.3%, EPS growth 350.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 56.4%
- 11.3% revenue growth vs BYD's 4.1%
- Lower P/E (11.0x vs 11.9x)
BYD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 0.8%
- 365.7% 10Y total return vs MLCO's -29.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.86, current ratio 0.54x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.3% revenue growth vs BYD's 4.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.0x vs 11.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 45.0% margin vs MLCO's 3.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs MLCO's 1.11 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.2% vs MLCO's -0.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.9% ROA vs MLCO's 2.4%, ROIC 12.3% vs 8.6% |
MLCO vs BYD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MLCO vs BYD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BYD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MLCO and BYD operate at a comparable scale, with $5.2B and $4.1B in trailing revenue. BYD is the more profitable business, keeping 45.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MLCO's 3.6%. On growth, MLCO holds the edge at +8.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.2B | $4.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.1B | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $185M | $1.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $388M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.8% | +42.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.6% | +21.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +45.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.2% | +9.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.6% | +2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.1% | -6.8% |
Valuation Metrics
MLCO leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.8x trailing earnings, BYD trades at a 70% valuation discount to MLCO's 12.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MLCO's 7.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BYD's 7.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $6.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.3B | $9.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.44x | 3.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.00x | 11.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.25x | 7.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.44x | 1.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.78x | 16.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BYD leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MLCO scores 8/9 vs BYD's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +91.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.4% | +27.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.6% | +12.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.1% | +15.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6.0B | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.0B | $353M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.0B | $3.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.30x | 15.78x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BYD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BYD five years ago would be worth $13,011 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,075 for MLCO. Over the past 12 months, BYD leads with a +21.2% total return vs MLCO's -0.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BYD at 7.5% vs MLCO's -23.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.4% | -0.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -0.7% | +21.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.9% | +24.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.2% | +30.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.0% | +365.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -23.9% | +7.5% |
Risk & Volatility
BYD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BYD is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MLCO's 1.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BYD currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs MLCO's 55.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.11x | 0.86x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.15 | $89.96 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.22 | $69.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +55.2% | +94.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.2 | 49.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 932K |
Analyst Outlook
BYD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MLCO as "Buy" and BYD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 69.6% upside for MLCO (target: $10) vs 11.5% for BYD (target: $95). BYD is the only dividend payer here at 0.84% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.50 | $95.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.0% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.00 | $0.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.3% | +12.1% |
BYD leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MLCO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
MLCO vs BYD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MLCO or BYD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO) is the stronger pick with 11.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 1% for Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD). Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) offers the better valuation at 3. 8x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MLCO or BYD?
On trailing P/E, Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is the cheapest at 3.
8x versus Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited at 12. 4x. On forward P/E, Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited is actually cheaper at 11. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MLCO or BYD?
Over the past 5 years, Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) delivered a total return of +30.
1%, compared to -69. 2% for Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BYD returned +365. 7% versus MLCO's -29. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MLCO or BYD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
86β versus Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited's 1. 11β — meaning MLCO is approximately 29% more volatile than BYD relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — MLCO or BYD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO) is pulling ahead at 11.
3% versus 4. 1% for Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited grew EPS 350. 0% year-over-year, compared to 264. 5% for Boyd Gaming Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MLCO leads at 56. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MLCO or BYD?
Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is the more profitable company, earning 45.
0% net margin versus 3. 6% for Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited — meaning it keeps 45. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BYD leads at 21. 4% versus 11. 6% for MLCO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BYD leads at 42. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MLCO or BYD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO) trades at 11.
0x forward P/E versus 11. 9x for Boyd Gaming Corporation — 0. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MLCO: 69. 6% to $9. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — MLCO or BYD?
In this comparison, BYD (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. MLCO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MLCO or BYD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
86), 0. 8% yield, +365. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BYD: +365. 7%, MLCO: -29. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MLCO and BYD?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
BYD pays a dividend while MLCO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.