Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MLEC vs RKDA vs PGEN vs CTVA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural Inputs
Biotechnology
Agricultural Inputs
MLEC vs RKDA vs PGEN vs CTVA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Agricultural Inputs | Biotechnology | Agricultural Inputs |
| Market Cap | $7M | $2M | $1.22B | $53.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8M | $5M | $6M | $17.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $-2M | $-247M | $1.16B |
| Gross Margin | -8.2% | 36.2% | 23.0% | 33.5% |
| Operating Margin | -116.7% | -51.4% | -18.6% | 13.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 21.6x |
| Total Debt | $247M | $0.00 | $6M | $2.58B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $768K | $259K | $30M | $4.52B |
MLEC vs RKDA vs PGEN vs CTVA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moolec Science S.A. (MLEC) | 100 | 92.6 | -7.4% |
| Arcadia Biosciences… (RKDA) | 100 | 1.0 | -99.0% |
| Precigen, Inc. (PGEN) | 100 | 60.2 | -39.8% |
| Corteva, Inc. (CTVA) | 100 | 169.6 | +69.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MLEC vs RKDA vs PGEN vs CTVA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MLEC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 58.3% revenue growth vs PGEN's -36.9%
RKDA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PGEN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +207.4% vs RKDA's -74.4%
CTVA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.29, yield 0.9%
- Rev growth 2.9%, EPS growth 23.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.1%
- 186.7% 10Y total return vs MLEC's -8.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.29, Low D/E 10.6%, current ratio 1.43x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 58.3% revenue growth vs PGEN's -36.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.5% margin vs PGEN's -39.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.29 vs PGEN's 1.44, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +207.4% vs RKDA's -74.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.7% ROA vs PGEN's -144.1%, ROIC 8.5% vs -152.8% |
MLEC vs RKDA vs PGEN vs CTVA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MLEC vs RKDA vs PGEN vs CTVA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CTVA leads in 4 of 6 categories
PGEN leads 1 • MLEC leads 0 • RKDA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CTVA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CTVA is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.9B annually — 3682.4x RKDA's $5M. CTVA is the more profitable business, keeping 6.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PGEN's -39.1%. On growth, MLEC holds the edge at +9.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8M | $5M | $6M | $17.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | -$2M | -$115M | $3.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | -$2M | -$247M | $1.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | -$5M | -$76M | $2.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -8.2% | +36.2% | +23.0% | +33.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -116.7% | -51.4% | -18.6% | +13.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -105.7% | -48.1% | -39.1% | +6.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -78.1% | -97.6% | -12.0% | +11.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.5% | -25.9% | +2.1% | +11.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.0% | +16.9% | -11.7% | +12.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MLEC and RKDA and PGEN and CTVA each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CTVA's 13.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MLEC's 21.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $2M | $1.2B | $53.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $253M | $1M | $1.2B | $51.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.03x | -0.64x | -8.83x | 49.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 21.57x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 4.14x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.45x | — | — | 13.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 0.31x | 309.66x | 3.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.36x | 28.85x | 2.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 18.86x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CTVA leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CTVA delivers a 4.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-6 for PGEN. CTVA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PGEN's 0.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CTVA scores 6/9 vs RKDA's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -150.9% | -40.6% | -5.9% | +4.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -26.6% | -26.1% | -144.1% | +2.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.8% | -2.5% | -152.8% | +8.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -129.5% | -107.2% | +8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.14x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $246M | -$259,000 | -$24M | -$1.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $767,919 | $259,000 | $30M | $4.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $247M | $0 | $6M | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.94x | — | -273.83x | 5.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PGEN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CTVA five years ago would be worth $16,828 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $106 for RKDA. Over the past 12 months, PGEN leads with a +207.4% total return vs RKDA's -74.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PGEN at 49.2% vs RKDA's -44.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3153.6% | -48.8% | -3.0% | +17.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.0% | -74.4% | +207.4% | +27.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.1% | -82.8% | +232.0% | +40.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.0% | -98.9% | -36.5% | +68.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.5% | -99.9% | -84.6% | +186.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -33.1% | -44.4% | +49.2% | +12.1% |
Risk & Volatility
CTVA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CTVA is the less volatile stock with a 0.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PGEN's 1.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CTVA currently trades 92.3% from its 52-week high vs RKDA's 16.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.89x | 0.98x | 1.44x | 0.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.22 | $6.71 | $5.23 | $85.63 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.20 | $1.01 | $1.23 | $60.54 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +38.7% | +16.4% | +79.3% | +92.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.3 | 42.3 | 62.7 | 53.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 319K | 35K | 4.3M | 3.4M |
Analyst Outlook
CTVA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PGEN as "Buy", CTVA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.6% upside for PGEN (target: $6) vs 11.5% for CTVA (target: $88). CTVA is the only dividend payer here at 0.89% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $6.00 | $88.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 16 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +14.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.0% |
CTVA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PGEN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
MLEC vs RKDA vs PGEN vs CTVA: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MLEC or RKDA or PGEN or CTVA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Moolec Science S.
A. (MLEC) is the stronger pick with 58. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -36. 9% for Precigen, Inc. (PGEN). Corteva, Inc. (CTVA) offers the better valuation at 49. 4x trailing P/E (21. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Precigen, Inc. (PGEN) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MLEC or RKDA or PGEN or CTVA?
Over the past 5 years, Corteva, Inc.
(CTVA) delivered a total return of +68. 3%, compared to -98. 9% for Arcadia Biosciences, Inc. (RKDA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CTVA returned +186. 7% versus RKDA's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MLEC or RKDA or PGEN or CTVA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Corteva, Inc.
(CTVA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 29β versus Precigen, Inc. 's 1. 44β — meaning PGEN is approximately 391% more volatile than CTVA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Corteva, Inc. (CTVA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 14% for Precigen, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MLEC or RKDA or PGEN or CTVA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Moolec Science S.
A. (MLEC) is pulling ahead at 58. 3% versus -36. 9% for Precigen, Inc. (PGEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arcadia Biosciences, Inc. grew EPS 66. 9% year-over-year, compared to -89. 8% for Moolec Science S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CTVA leads at -0. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MLEC or RKDA or PGEN or CTVA?
Corteva, Inc.
(CTVA) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 3% net margin versus -32. 2% for Precigen, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTVA leads at 15. 1% versus -34. 4% for PGEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CTVA leads at 43. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is MLEC or RKDA or PGEN or CTVA more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PGEN: 44.
6% to $6. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — MLEC or RKDA or PGEN or CTVA?
In this comparison, CTVA (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. MLEC, RKDA, PGEN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is MLEC or RKDA or PGEN or CTVA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Corteva, Inc.
(CTVA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 29), 0. 9% yield, +186. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CTVA: +186. 7%, PGEN: -84. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MLEC and RKDA and PGEN and CTVA?
These companies operate in different sectors (MLEC (Healthcare) and RKDA (Basic Materials) and PGEN (Healthcare) and CTVA (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MLEC is a small-cap high-growth stock; RKDA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PGEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CTVA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. CTVA pays a dividend while MLEC, RKDA, PGEN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.