MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd
Software - Application
Market Cap$21M
5Y Perf.-46.3%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
MNDO vs NTCT vs VIAV vs CSCO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
NTCT
NetScout Systems, Inc.
Software - Infrastructure
Market Cap$2.77B
5Y Perf.+39.4%
VIAV
Viavi Solutions Inc.
Communication Equipment
Market Cap$11.81B
5Y Perf.+340.5%
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Communication Equipment
Market Cap$364.95B
5Y Perf.+92.7%
MNDO vs NTCT vs VIAV vs CSCO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | MNDO | NTCT | VIAV | CSCO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Communication Equipment | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $21M | $2.77B | $11.81B | $364.95B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19M | $861M | $1.37B | $59.05B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $96M | $-55M | $11.08B |
| Gross Margin | 51.0% | 79.2% | 55.7% | 64.4% |
| Operating Margin | 10.7% | 12.8% | 8.2% | 23.0% |
| Forward P/E | 7.8x | 15.9x | 55.2x | 22.2x |
| Total Debt | $929K | $76M | $692M | $29.64B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $457M | $424M | $9.47B |
MNDO vs NTCT vs VIAV vs CSCO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
MNDO
NTCT
VIAV
CSCO
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO) | 100 | 53.7 | -46.3% |
| NetScout Systems, I… (NTCT) | 100 | 139.4 | +39.4% |
| Viavi Solutions Inc. (VIAV) | 100 | 440.5 | +340.5% |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) | 100 | 192.7 | +92.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MNDO vs NTCT vs VIAV vs CSCO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: MNDO leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Viavi Solutions Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. CSCO also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd
The Income Pick
MNDO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 21.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.07, Low D/E 4.0%, current ratio 3.83x
- Beta 0.07, yield 21.6%, current ratio 3.83x
- Lower P/E (7.8x vs 22.2x)
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
NTCT
NetScout Systems, Inc.
The Secondary Option
NTCT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: technology exposure
VIAV
Viavi Solutions Inc.
The Growth Play
VIAV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 8.4%, EPS growth 225.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -5.7%
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs CSCO's 301.7%
- 8.4% revenue growth vs MNDO's -9.3%
- +466.6% vs MNDO's -34.8%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.
The Quality Compounder
CSCO is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- 18.8% margin vs VIAV's -4.0%
- 9.0% ROA vs VIAV's -2.3%, ROIC 13.0% vs 5.5%
Best for: quality and efficiency
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | VIAV | 8.4% revenue growth vs MNDO's -9.3% |
| Value | MNDO | Lower P/E (7.8x vs 22.2x) |
| Quality / Margins | CSCO | 18.8% margin vs VIAV's -4.0% |
| Stability / Safety | MNDO | Beta 0.07 vs VIAV's 1.54, lower leverage |
| Dividends | MNDO | 21.6% yield, vs CSCO's 1.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) |
| Momentum (1Y) | VIAV | +466.6% vs MNDO's -34.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CSCO | 9.0% ROA vs VIAV's -2.3%, ROIC 13.0% vs 5.5% |
MNDO vs NTCT vs VIAV vs CSCO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
MNDO vs NTCT vs VIAV vs CSCO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCSCOLAGGINGNTCT
Who Leads Where
CSCO leads in 2 of 6 categories
MNDO leads 1 • VIAV leads 1 • NTCT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓NTCTNetScout Systems, Inc.
0leads
VIAVViavi Solutions Inc.
1leads
MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd
1leads
CSCOCisco Systems, Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs MNDOvs VIAVMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CSCO3/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
MNDO4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CSCO5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
VIAV6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSCO is the larger business by revenue, generating $59.1B annually — 3035.1x MNDO's $19M. CSCO is the more profitable business, keeping 18.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VIAV's -4.0%. On growth, VIAV holds the edge at +42.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd | NTCTNetScout Systems,… | VIAVViavi Solutions I… | CSCOCisco Systems, In… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19M | $861M | $1.4B | $59.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $171M | $207M | $16.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | $96M | -$55M | $11.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $275M | $46M | $12.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.0% | +79.2% | +55.7% | +64.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +12.8% | +8.2% | +23.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | +11.1% | -4.0% | +18.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.9% | +32.0% | +3.3% | +21.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.0% | -0.5% | +42.8% | +9.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -23.4% | +11.9% | -70.2% | +29.5% |
CSCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
MNDO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.8x trailing earnings, MNDO trades at a 98% valuation discount to VIAV's 340.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MNDO's 5.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VIAV's 90.4x.
| Metric | MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd | NTCTNetScout Systems,… | VIAVViavi Solutions I… | CSCOCisco Systems, In… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21M | $2.8B | $11.8B | $365.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13M | $2.4B | $12.1B | $385.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.77x | -7.57x | 340.33x | 36.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.87x | 55.18x | 22.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 74.57x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.68x | — | 90.43x | 26.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.06x | 3.36x | 10.89x | 6.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.90x | 1.78x | 14.77x | 7.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.20x | 13.11x | 190.52x | 27.46x |
MNDO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CSCO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CSCO delivers a 23.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-7 for VIAV. MNDO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VIAV's 0.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CSCO scores 8/9 vs MNDO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd | NTCTNetScout Systems,… | VIAVViavi Solutions I… | CSCOCisco Systems, In… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.9% | +6.1% | -6.9% | +23.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.6% | +4.3% | -2.3% | +9.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.6% | -19.3% | +5.5% | +13.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.8% | -18.5% | +4.9% | +13.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.05x | 0.89x | 0.63x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | -$381M | $269M | $20.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $457M | $424M | $9.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $929,000 | $76M | $692M | $29.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 55.89x | 2.70x | 9.64x |
CSCO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VIAV leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VIAV five years ago would be worth $31,204 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,502 for MNDO. Over the past 12 months, VIAV leads with a +466.6% total return vs MNDO's -34.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VIAV at 77.7% vs MNDO's -8.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd | NTCTNetScout Systems,… | VIAVViavi Solutions I… | CSCOCisco Systems, In… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.7% | +42.6% | +181.3% | +22.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -34.8% | +80.5% | +466.6% | +57.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.2% | +30.3% | +461.0% | +109.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.0% | +42.9% | +212.0% | +87.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.7% | +66.6% | +715.5% | +301.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.8% | +9.2% | +77.7% | +27.9% |
VIAV leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MNDO and NTCT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MNDO is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VIAV's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTCT currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs MNDO's 61.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd | NTCTNetScout Systems,… | VIAVViavi Solutions I… | CSCOCisco Systems, In… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.07x | 1.12x | 1.54x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.64 | $39.24 | $60.43 | $94.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.98 | $19.98 | $8.87 | $59.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.6% | +97.6% | +84.5% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 27.4 | 68.6 | 66.7 | 63.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 37K | 552K | 6.3M | 18.9M |
Evenly matched — MNDO and NTCT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MNDO and CSCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NTCT as "Hold", VIAV as "Buy", CSCO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.7% upside for CSCO (target: $97) vs -36.8% for VIAV (target: $32). For income investors, MNDO offers the higher dividend yield at 21.61% vs CSCO's 1.75%.
| Metric | MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd | NTCTNetScout Systems,… | VIAVViavi Solutions I… | CSCOCisco Systems, In… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $29.00 | $32.25 | $96.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 21 | 19 | 73 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +21.6% | — | — | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 1 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.22 | — | — | $1.61 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +0.9% | +0.1% | +2.0% |
Evenly matched — MNDO and CSCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
CSCO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MNDO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallCisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
MNDO vs NTCT vs VIAV vs CSCO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MNDO or NTCT or VIAV or CSCO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Viavi Solutions Inc.
(VIAV) is the stronger pick with 8. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 3% for MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO). MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO) offers the better valuation at 7. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Viavi Solutions Inc. (VIAV) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MNDO or NTCT or VIAV or CSCO?
On trailing P/E, MIND C.
T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the cheapest at 7. 8x versus Viavi Solutions Inc. at 340. 3x. On forward P/E, NetScout Systems, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MNDO or NTCT or VIAV or CSCO?
Over the past 5 years, Viavi Solutions Inc.
(VIAV) delivered a total return of +212. 0%, compared to -35. 0% for MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VIAV returned +715. 5% versus NTCT's +66. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MNDO or NTCT or VIAV or CSCO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MIND C.
T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 07β versus Viavi Solutions Inc. 's 1. 54β — meaning VIAV is approximately 2136% more volatile than MNDO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 89% for Viavi Solutions Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MNDO or NTCT or VIAV or CSCO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Viavi Solutions Inc.
(VIAV) is pulling ahead at 8. 4% versus -9. 3% for MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Viavi Solutions Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -144. 4% for NetScout Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CSCO leads at 3. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MNDO or NTCT or VIAV or CSCO?
Cisco Systems, Inc.
(CSCO) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 0% net margin versus -44. 6% for NetScout Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CSCO leads at 20. 8% versus -44. 7% for NTCT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTCT leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MNDO or NTCT or VIAV or CSCO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, NetScout Systems, Inc.
(NTCT) trades at 15. 9x forward P/E versus 55. 2x for Viavi Solutions Inc. — 39. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CSCO: 4. 7% to $96. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — MNDO or NTCT or VIAV or CSCO?
In this comparison, MNDO (21.
6% yield), CSCO (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. NTCT, VIAV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MNDO or NTCT or VIAV or CSCO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MIND C.
T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 07), 21. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MNDO: +66. 7%, NTCT: +66. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MNDO and NTCT and VIAV and CSCO?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MNDO is a small-cap deep-value stock; NTCT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VIAV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CSCO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. MNDO, CSCO pay a dividend while NTCT, VIAV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(MNDO: -6.0% · NTCT: -0.5%)Net Margin>
%
(MNDO: 13.4% · NTCT: 11.1%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.