Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MNKD vs LLY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
MNKD vs LLY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $1.10B | $932.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $361M | $72.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-24M | $25.27B |
| Gross Margin | 79.3% | 83.5% |
| Operating Margin | 4.1% | 45.9% |
| Forward P/E | 218.4x | 28.6x |
| Total Debt | $473M | $42.50B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $75M | $7.16B |
MNKD vs LLY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MannKind Corporation (MNKD) | 100 | 235.8 | +135.8% |
| Eli Lilly and Compa… (LLY) | 100 | 645.4 | +545.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MNKD vs LLY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, MNKD is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
LLY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.71, yield 0.6%
- Rev growth 44.7%, EPS growth 96.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.7%
- 12.7% 10Y total return vs MNKD's -46.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 44.7% revenue growth vs MNKD's 22.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (28.6x vs 218.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.0% margin vs MNKD's -6.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs MNKD's 0.90 | |
| Dividends | 0.6% yield; 11-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.2% vs MNKD's -25.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.7% ROA vs MNKD's -3.9%, ROIC 41.8% vs 21.6% |
MNKD vs LLY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MNKD vs LLY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LLY leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LLY is the larger business by revenue, generating $72.2B annually — 200.3x MNKD's $361M. LLY is the more profitable business, keeping 35.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MNKD's -6.6%. On growth, LLY holds the edge at +55.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $361M | $72.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $25M | $34.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$24M | $25.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $13M | $13.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +79.3% | +83.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.1% | +45.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.6% | +35.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +18.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.1% | +55.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.2% | +169.9% |
Valuation Metrics
MNKD leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 43.0x trailing earnings, LLY trades at a 76% valuation discount to MNKD's 178.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MNKD's 29.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LLY's 31.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $932.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $968.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 178.00x | 43.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 218.40x | 28.59x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.49x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.32x | 30.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.15x | 14.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 33.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 80.31x | 103.95x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LLY leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LLY scores 8/9 vs MNKD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +101.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.9% | +22.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +21.6% | +41.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.3% | +46.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $399M | $35.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $75M | $7.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $473M | $42.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.75x | 35.68x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LLY leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LLY five years ago would be worth $52,144 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,725 for MNKD. Over the past 12 months, LLY leads with a +28.2% total return vs MNKD's -25.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LLY at 32.4% vs MNKD's -2.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -36.4% | -8.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -25.5% | +28.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.2% | +131.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.7% | +421.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.5% | +1271.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.8% | +32.4% |
Risk & Volatility
LLY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LLY is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNKD's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LLY currently trades 87.1% from its 52-week high vs MNKD's 54.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 0.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.51 | $1133.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.23 | $623.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.7% | +87.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.6 | 61.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.8M | 2.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MNKD as "Buy" and LLY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 96.6% upside for MNKD (target: $7) vs 27.5% for LLY (target: $1258). LLY is the only dividend payer here at 0.61% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $1258.47 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $6.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% |
LLY leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MNKD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
MNKD vs LLY: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MNKD or LLY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the stronger pick with 44.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 22. 2% for MannKind Corporation (MNKD). Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) offers the better valuation at 43. 0x trailing P/E (28. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MannKind Corporation (MNKD) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MNKD or LLY?
On trailing P/E, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the cheapest at 43.
0x versus MannKind Corporation at 178. 0x. On forward P/E, Eli Lilly and Company is actually cheaper at 28. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MNKD or LLY?
Over the past 5 years, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) delivered a total return of +421.
4%, compared to -12. 7% for MannKind Corporation (MNKD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LLY returned +1272% versus MNKD's -46. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MNKD or LLY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
71β versus MannKind Corporation's 0. 90β — meaning MNKD is approximately 26% more volatile than LLY relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — MNKD or LLY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is pulling ahead at 44.
7% versus 22. 2% for MannKind Corporation (MNKD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Eli Lilly and Company grew EPS 96. 0% year-over-year, compared to -79. 4% for MannKind Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNKD leads at 51. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MNKD or LLY?
Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the more profitable company, earning 31.
7% net margin versus 1. 7% for MannKind Corporation — meaning it keeps 31. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LLY leads at 45. 6% versus 11. 1% for MNKD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LLY leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MNKD or LLY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) trades at 28.
6x forward P/E versus 218. 4x for MannKind Corporation — 189. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MNKD: 96. 6% to $7. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MNKD or LLY?
In this comparison, LLY (0.
6% yield) pays a dividend. MNKD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MNKD or LLY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
71), 0. 6% yield, +1272% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LLY: +1272%, MNKD: -46. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MNKD and LLY?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
LLY pays a dividend while MNKD does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.