Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MNKD vs UTHR vs INSM vs ACAD vs PTCT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
MNKD vs UTHR vs INSM vs ACAD vs PTCT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.10B | $24.95B | $22.62B | $3.86B | $5.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $361M | $3.17B | $606M | $1.10B | $827M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-24M | $1.29B | $-1.28B | $376M | $-187M |
| Gross Margin | 79.3% | 86.6% | 79.4% | 91.5% | 49.7% |
| Operating Margin | 4.1% | 45.3% | -194.0% | 7.4% | -8.3% |
| Forward P/E | 217.8x | 19.4x | — | 50.9x | 8.3x |
| Total Debt | $473M | $0.00 | $768M | $52M | $492M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $75M | $1.56B | $510M | $178M | $985M |
MNKD vs UTHR vs INSM vs ACAD vs PTCT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MannKind Corporation (MNKD) | 100 | 235.1 | +135.1% |
| United Therapeutics… (UTHR) | 100 | 482.6 | +382.6% |
| Insmed Incorporated (INSM) | 100 | 431.5 | +331.5% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 45.4 | -54.6% |
| PTC Therapeutics, I… (PTCT) | 100 | 127.2 | +27.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MNKD vs UTHR vs INSM vs ACAD vs PTCT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MNKD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
UTHR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.19
- Lower volatility, beta 0.19, current ratio 6.60x
- Beta 0.19, current ratio 6.60x
- 40.6% margin vs INSM's -210.5%
INSM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.9% 10Y total return vs PTCT's 7.3%
ACAD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for efficiency.
- 26.2% ROA vs INSM's -57.3%, ROIC 10.0% vs -86.5%
PTCT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 114.5%, EPS growth 264.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.3%
- 114.5% revenue growth vs UTHR's 10.6%
- Lower P/E (8.3x vs 50.9x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 114.5% revenue growth vs UTHR's 10.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.3x vs 50.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 40.6% margin vs INSM's -210.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.19 vs ACAD's 1.26 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +85.4% vs MNKD's -26.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.2% ROA vs INSM's -57.3%, ROIC 10.0% vs -86.5% |
MNKD vs UTHR vs INSM vs ACAD vs PTCT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MNKD vs UTHR vs INSM vs ACAD vs PTCT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
UTHR leads in 3 of 6 categories
PTCT leads 1 • INSM leads 1 • MNKD leads 0 • ACAD leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UTHR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UTHR is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 8.8x MNKD's $361M. UTHR is the more profitable business, keeping 40.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INSM's -2.1%. On growth, INSM holds the edge at +152.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $361M | $3.2B | $606M | $1.1B | $827M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $25M | $1.6B | -$1.2B | $96M | -$37M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$24M | $1.3B | -$1.3B | $376M | -$187M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $13M | $1.0B | -$998M | $212M | -$229M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +79.3% | +86.6% | +79.4% | +91.5% | +49.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.1% | +45.3% | -194.0% | +7.4% | -8.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.6% | +40.6% | -2.1% | +34.3% | -22.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +32.1% | -164.5% | +19.4% | -27.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.1% | -1.6% | +152.6% | +9.7% | -76.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.2% | -12.2% | -16.7% | -81.8% | -100.3% |
Valuation Metrics
PTCT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.3x trailing earnings, PTCT trades at a 95% valuation discount to MNKD's 177.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PTCT's 5.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MNKD's 29.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $24.9B | $22.6B | $3.9B | $5.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $23.4B | $22.9B | $3.7B | $4.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 177.50x | 20.43x | -16.35x | 9.85x | 8.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 217.79x | 19.38x | — | 50.91x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.06x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.26x | 14.82x | — | 26.91x | 5.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.14x | 7.84x | 37.30x | 3.61x | 3.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 3.84x | 30.30x | 3.15x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 80.08x | 23.97x | — | 36.74x | 7.61x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UTHR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-168 for INSM. ACAD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INSM's 1.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UTHR scores 7/9 vs INSM's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +19.2% | -168.4% | +35.6% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.9% | +17.2% | -57.3% | +26.2% | -6.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +21.6% | +21.1% | -86.5% | +10.0% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.3% | +21.4% | -66.8% | +10.1% | +55.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 1.04x | 0.04x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $399M | -$1.6B | $258M | -$126M | -$492M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $75M | $1.6B | $510M | $178M | $985M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $473M | $0 | $768M | $52M | $492M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.75x | 125.37x | -14.23x | — | -1.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INSM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INSM five years ago would be worth $32,168 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,275 for MNKD. Over the past 12 months, UTHR leads with a +85.4% total return vs MNKD's -26.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INSM at 77.0% vs MNKD's -2.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -36.6% | +14.6% | -40.8% | -13.7% | -16.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.8% | +85.4% | +53.5% | +52.4% | +58.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.5% | +170.4% | +454.5% | +4.7% | +16.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.2% | +191.3% | +221.7% | +7.1% | +60.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.2% | +410.0% | +793.5% | -22.9% | +733.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.9% | +39.3% | +77.0% | +1.5% | +5.1% |
Risk & Volatility
UTHR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UTHR is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACAD's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UTHR currently trades 93.4% from its 52-week high vs INSM's 49.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 0.19x | 0.54x | 1.26x | 1.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.51 | $609.35 | $212.75 | $27.81 | $87.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.23 | $272.12 | $63.81 | $14.45 | $37.94 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.5% | +93.4% | +49.3% | +81.1% | +73.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.3 | 65.0 | 41.9 | 44.2 | 45.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.4M | 516K | 2.3M | 1.8M | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MNKD as "Buy", UTHR as "Buy", INSM as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", PTCT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 107.2% upside for INSM (target: $217) vs 7.3% for UTHR (target: $611).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $610.67 | $217.11 | $34.78 | $89.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 30 | 35 | 37 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
UTHR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PTCT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
MNKD vs UTHR vs INSM vs ACAD vs PTCT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MNKD or UTHR or INSM or ACAD or PTCT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the stronger pick with 114. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 6% for United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR). PTC Therapeutics, Inc. (PTCT) offers the better valuation at 8. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MannKind Corporation (MNKD) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MNKD or UTHR or INSM or ACAD or PTCT?
On trailing P/E, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the cheapest at 8. 3x versus MannKind Corporation at 177. 5x. On forward P/E, United Therapeutics Corporation is actually cheaper at 19. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MNKD or UTHR or INSM or ACAD or PTCT?
Over the past 5 years, Insmed Incorporated (INSM) delivered a total return of +221.
7%, compared to -17. 2% for MannKind Corporation (MNKD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSM returned +793. 5% versus MNKD's -46. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MNKD or UTHR or INSM or ACAD or PTCT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
19β versus ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. 's 1. 26β — meaning ACAD is approximately 558% more volatile than UTHR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 104% for Insmed Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MNKD or UTHR or INSM or ACAD or PTCT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is pulling ahead at 114. 5% versus 10. 6% for United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PTC Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 264. 5% year-over-year, compared to -79. 4% for MannKind Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNKD leads at 51. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MNKD or UTHR or INSM or ACAD or PTCT?
United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR) is the more profitable company, earning 41.
9% net margin versus -210. 5% for Insmed Incorporated — meaning it keeps 41. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PTCT leads at 49. 5% versus -194. 0% for INSM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PTCT leads at 95. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MNKD or UTHR or INSM or ACAD or PTCT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR) trades at 19.
4x forward P/E versus 217. 8x for MannKind Corporation — 198. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INSM: 107. 2% to $217. 11.
08Which pays a better dividend — MNKD or UTHR or INSM or ACAD or PTCT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is MNKD or UTHR or INSM or ACAD or PTCT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
19), +410. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (UTHR: +410. 0%, ACAD: -22. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MNKD and UTHR and INSM and ACAD and PTCT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MNKD is a small-cap high-growth stock; UTHR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; INSM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; PTCT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.