Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MNMD vs CMPS vs ATAI vs CYBN vs MGRX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Care Facilities
Medical - Pharmaceuticals
Biotechnology
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
MNMD vs CMPS vs ATAI vs CYBN vs MGRX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Pharmaceuticals | Biotechnology | Medical - Healthcare Information Services |
| Market Cap | $2.04B | $896M | $962M | $304M | $5M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $3M | $0.00 | $467K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-184M | $-288M | $-154M | $-123M | $-20M |
| Gross Margin | — | — | -259.1% | — | 60.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | — | -34.6% | — | -41.4% |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $21M | $25M | $0.00 | $215K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $258M | $150M | $18M | $135M | $59K |
MNMD vs CMPS vs ATAI vs CYBN vs MGRX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mind Medicine (Mind… (MNMD) | 100 | 652.7 | +552.7% |
| COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS) | 100 | 55.4 | -44.6% |
| Atai Beckley N.V (ATAI) | 100 | 195.6 | +95.6% |
| Cybin Inc. (CYBN) | 100 | 45.3 | -54.7% |
| Mangoceuticals, Inc. (MGRX) | 100 | 2.1 | -97.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MNMD vs CMPS vs ATAI vs CYBN vs MGRX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MNMD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 5.1% 10Y total return vs ATAI's -47.8%
- +215.9% vs MGRX's -82.3%
- -41.8% ROA vs CMPS's -106.8%
Among these 5 stocks, CMPS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ATAI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth -1.9%, EPS growth -272.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -75.3%
- -1.9% revenue growth vs CMPS's -85.7%
CYBN is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.52, current ratio 7.75x
- 3.2% margin vs ATAI's -51.1%
MGRX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.90, yield 100.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 1.5%, current ratio 0.05x
- Beta 0.90 vs MNMD's 1.68
- 100.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.9% revenue growth vs CMPS's -85.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs ATAI's -51.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.90 vs MNMD's 1.68 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +215.9% vs MGRX's -82.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -41.8% ROA vs CMPS's -106.8% |
MNMD vs CMPS vs ATAI vs CYBN vs MGRX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MNMD vs CMPS vs ATAI vs CYBN vs MGRX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MGRX leads in 2 of 6 categories
MNMD leads 2 • CMPS leads 0 • ATAI leads 0 • CYBN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGRX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ATAI and CYBN operate at a comparable scale, with $3M and $0 in trailing revenue. MGRX is the more profitable business, keeping -42.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATAI's -51.1%. On growth, ATAI holds the edge at +17.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | $3M | $0 | $466,908 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$156M | -$179M | -$103M | -$147M | -$17M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$184M | -$288M | -$154M | -$123M | -$20M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$161M | -$157M | -$90M | -$106M | -$6M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | -2.6% | — | +60.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | -34.6% | — | -41.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | -51.1% | — | -42.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | -29.9% | — | -12.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +17.7% | — | -36.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -22.0% | -58.7% | -75.0% | -8.2% | +30.5% |
Valuation Metrics
MGRX leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $896M | $962M | $304M | $5M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $767M | $969M | $205M | $5M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.04x | -3.03x | -4.30x | -13.66x | -0.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | 3122.56x | — | 8.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.56x | — | 5.50x | 6.52x | 0.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MNMD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MNMD delivers a -55.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-55 in annual profit, vs $-3 for CMPS. MGRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ATAI's 0.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MGRX scores 4/9 vs ATAI's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -55.3% | -3.4% | -96.4% | -81.0% | -114.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -41.8% | -106.8% | -64.3% | -58.3% | -106.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.9% | — | -45.0% | -115.8% | -83.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -52.2% | -2.5% | -50.4% | -54.1% | -107.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.21x | — | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$258M | -$129M | $7M | -$135M | $156,309 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $258M | $150M | $18M | $135M | $58,653 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $21M | $25M | $0 | $214,962 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -14.63x | -52.40x | -68.93x | — | -581.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MNMD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MNMD five years ago would be worth $4,117 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $53 for MGRX. Over the past 12 months, MNMD leads with a +215.9% total return vs MGRX's -82.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MNMD at 82.4% vs MGRX's -74.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +51.7% | +42.3% | +3.4% | -26.4% | -62.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +215.9% | +130.7% | +172.1% | -6.3% | -82.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +506.7% | +15.9% | +99.0% | -49.9% | -98.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.8% | -73.3% | -79.9% | -90.2% | -99.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +512.1% | -67.9% | -47.8% | -99.7% | -99.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +82.4% | +5.0% | +25.8% | -20.6% | -74.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MNMD and MGRX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MGRX is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNMD's 1.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MNMD currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs MGRX's 11.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.68x | 1.33x | 1.48x | 1.52x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.09 | $10.21 | $6.75 | $9.83 | $2.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.03 | $2.25 | $1.29 | $5.50 | $0.27 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.1% | +91.3% | +59.3% | +62.0% | +11.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.9 | 67.8 | 52.4 | 35.5 | 43.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 803K | 3.7M | 6.0M | 292K | 7.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MNMD as "Buy", CMPS as "Buy", ATAI as "Buy", CYBN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 200.0% upside for ATAI (target: $12) vs -3.3% for MNMD (target: $20). MGRX is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.00 | $17.83 | $12.00 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 13 | 4 | 4 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +100.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.41 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MGRX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MNMD leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
MNMD vs CMPS vs ATAI vs CYBN vs MGRX: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MNMD or CMPS or ATAI or CYBN or MGRX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Atai Beckley N.
V (ATAI) is the stronger pick with -1. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 8% for Mangoceuticals, Inc. (MGRX). Analysts rate Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc. (MNMD) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MNMD or CMPS or ATAI or CYBN or MGRX?
Over the past 5 years, Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc.
(MNMD) delivered a total return of -58. 8%, compared to -99. 5% for Mangoceuticals, Inc. (MGRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MNMD returned +512. 1% versus CYBN's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MNMD or CMPS or ATAI or CYBN or MGRX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mangoceuticals, Inc.
(MGRX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 90β versus Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc. 's 1. 68β — meaning MNMD is approximately 86% more volatile than MGRX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mangoceuticals, Inc. (MGRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 21% for Atai Beckley N. V — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MNMD or CMPS or ATAI or CYBN or MGRX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Atai Beckley N.
V (ATAI) is pulling ahead at -1. 9% versus -15. 8% for Mangoceuticals, Inc. (MGRX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cybin Inc. grew EPS 93. 5% year-over-year, compared to -1273. 3% for Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MNMD or CMPS or ATAI or CYBN or MGRX?
Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc.
(MNMD) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -484. 6% for Atai Beckley N. V — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MNMD leads at 0. 0% versus -333. 4% for ATAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATAI leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MNMD or CMPS or ATAI or CYBN or MGRX?
In this comparison, MGRX (100.
0% yield) pays a dividend. MNMD, CMPS, ATAI, CYBN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is MNMD or CMPS or ATAI or CYBN or MGRX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mangoceuticals, Inc.
(MGRX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90), 100. 0% yield). Cybin Inc. (CYBN) carries a higher beta of 1. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MGRX: -99. 5%, CYBN: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MNMD and CMPS and ATAI and CYBN and MGRX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MNMD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CMPS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ATAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CYBN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MGRX is a small-cap income-oriented stock. MGRX pays a dividend while MNMD, CMPS, ATAI, CYBN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.