Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MNR vs SM vs CIVI vs CHRD vs PR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
MNR vs SM vs CIVI vs CHRD vs PR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $2.31B | $3.39B | $2.34B | $7.73B | $16.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.23B | $3.79B | $4.71B | $5.33B | $3.69B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $235M | $131M | $638M | $-67M | $649M |
| Gross Margin | 54.6% | 45.1% | 43.9% | 16.1% | 32.7% |
| Operating Margin | 14.9% | 6.5% | 31.1% | 3.6% | 38.7% |
| Forward P/E | 8.5x | 4.3x | 6.8x | 7.2x | 10.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.16B | $2.30B | $4.49B | $1.50B | $3.70B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $43M | $368M | $76M | $190M | $154M |
MNR vs SM vs CIVI vs CHRD vs PR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mach Natural Resour… (MNR) | 100 | 74.6 | -25.4% |
| SM Energy Company (SM) | 100 | 73.0 | -27.0% |
| Civitas Resources, … (CIVI) | 100 | 35.9 | -64.1% |
| Chord Energy Corpor… (CHRD) | 100 | 82.5 | -17.5% |
| Permian Resources C… (PR) | 100 | 135.3 | +35.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MNR vs SM vs CIVI vs CHRD vs PR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MNR has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.20, yield 13.5%
- 19.0% margin vs CHRD's -1.3%
- 6.9% ROA vs CHRD's -0.5%, ROIC 10.1% vs 1.6%
SM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (4.3x vs 10.4x)
- 2.7% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs CIVI's 18.2%
CIVI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 49.8%, EPS growth -6.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 77.5%
- 49.8% revenue growth vs CHRD's -7.1%
CHRD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 5.4% 10Y total return vs PR's 115.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.04, Low D/E 18.6%, current ratio 1.06x
- Beta 0.04, yield 4.0%, current ratio 1.06x
- Beta 0.04 vs CIVI's 1.06, lower leverage
PR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +56.3% vs CIVI's +5.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 49.8% revenue growth vs CHRD's -7.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.3x vs 10.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.0% margin vs CHRD's -1.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.04 vs CIVI's 1.06, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs CIVI's 18.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +56.3% vs CIVI's +5.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.9% ROA vs CHRD's -0.5%, ROIC 10.1% vs 1.6% |
MNR vs SM vs CIVI vs CHRD vs PR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MNR vs SM vs CIVI vs CHRD vs PR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CIVI leads in 1 of 6 categories
MNR leads 1 • PR leads 1 • CHRD leads 1 • SM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MNR and CIVI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHRD is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.3B annually — 4.3x MNR's $1.2B. MNR is the more profitable business, keeping 19.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CHRD's -1.3%. On growth, SM holds the edge at +76.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $3.8B | $4.7B | $5.3B | $3.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $597M | $1.6B | $3.4B | $1.7B | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $235M | $131M | $638M | -$67M | $649M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $157M | -$226M | $934M | $522M | $339M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.6% | +45.1% | +43.9% | +16.1% | +32.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +6.5% | +31.1% | +3.6% | +38.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.0% | +3.4% | +13.6% | -1.3% | +17.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.7% | -5.9% | +19.8% | +9.8% | +9.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.1% | +76.2% | -8.1% | +37.1% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.5% | -2.8% | -33.9% | -47.8% | -88.6% |
Valuation Metrics
CIVI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.2x trailing earnings, CIVI trades at a 98% valuation discount to CHRD's 184.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CIVI's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PR's 5.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $3.4B | $2.3B | $7.7B | $16.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.4B | $5.3B | $6.8B | $9.0B | $19.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.61x | 5.22x | 3.24x | 184.38x | 15.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.47x | 4.33x | 6.75x | 7.19x | 10.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.15x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.47x | 2.62x | 1.89x | 5.42x | 5.67x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.97x | 1.07x | 0.45x | 1.59x | 3.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.91x | 0.70x | 0.41x | 0.98x | 1.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.78x | 5.91x | 2.61x | 11.16x | 29.29x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MNR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MNR delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-1 for CHRD. CHRD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CIVI's 0.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SM scores 7/9 vs PR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.4% | +2.5% | +9.5% | -0.8% | +5.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.9% | +1.1% | +4.2% | -0.5% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.1% | +8.9% | +10.8% | +1.6% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.4% | +10.4% | +12.1% | +1.7% | +9.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.58x | 0.48x | 0.68x | 0.19x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | $1.9B | $4.4B | $1.3B | $3.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $43M | $368M | $76M | $190M | $154M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $2.3B | $4.5B | $1.5B | $3.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.03x | 1.37x | 2.80x | 3.82x | 7.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PR five years ago would be worth $49,222 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,589 for MNR. Over the past 12 months, PR leads with a +56.3% total return vs CIVI's +5.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PR at 28.1% vs CIVI's -16.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.9% | +55.0% | -1.5% | +45.5% | +38.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.8% | +32.5% | +5.5% | +51.3% | +56.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.9% | +20.0% | -41.7% | +13.2% | +110.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.9% | +91.6% | +23.5% | +157.2% | +392.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.9% | +135.0% | -86.2% | +537.5% | +115.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.9% | +6.3% | -16.5% | +4.2% | +28.1% |
Risk & Volatility
CHRD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CHRD is the less volatile stock with a 0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CIVI's 1.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CHRD currently trades 90.7% from its 52-week high vs CIVI's 73.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.20x | 0.07x | 1.06x | 0.04x | 0.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.60 | $33.25 | $37.45 | $150.50 | $22.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.46 | $17.45 | $25.38 | $84.25 | $11.92 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.1% | +88.5% | +73.1% | +90.7% | +87.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.2 | 49.8 | 54.8 | 50.4 | 44.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 778K | 5.6M | 22.4M | 1.1M | 13.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SM and CIVI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MNR as "Buy", SM as "Buy", CIVI as "Hold", CHRD as "Buy", PR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.2% upside for MNR (target: $19) vs -1.5% for SM (target: $29). For income investors, CIVI offers the higher dividend yield at 18.19% vs SM's 2.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.00 | $29.00 | $31.00 | $144.10 | $22.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 54 | 16 | 19 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +13.5% | +2.7% | +18.2% | +4.0% | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.86 | $0.80 | $4.98 | $5.49 | $0.61 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% | +18.3% | +4.7% | +0.5% |
CIVI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). MNR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
MNR vs SM vs CIVI vs CHRD vs PR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MNR or SM or CIVI or CHRD or PR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the stronger pick with 49. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 1% for Chord Energy Corporation (CHRD). Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MNR or SM or CIVI or CHRD or PR?
On trailing P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus Chord Energy Corporation at 184. 4x. On forward P/E, SM Energy Company is actually cheaper at 4. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MNR or SM or CIVI or CHRD or PR?
Over the past 5 years, Permian Resources Corporation (PR) delivered a total return of +392.
2%, compared to +5. 9% for Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHRD returned +537. 5% versus CIVI's -86. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MNR or SM or CIVI or CHRD or PR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chord Energy Corporation (CHRD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
04β versus Civitas Resources, Inc. 's 1. 06β — meaning CIVI is approximately 2605% more volatile than CHRD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chord Energy Corporation (CHRD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 68% for Civitas Resources, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MNR or SM or CIVI or CHRD or PR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is pulling ahead at 49. 8% versus -7. 1% for Chord Energy Corporation (CHRD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Civitas Resources, Inc. grew EPS -6. 2% year-over-year, compared to -95. 4% for Chord Energy Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIVI leads at 77. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MNR or SM or CIVI or CHRD or PR?
Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) is the more profitable company, earning 24.
3% net margin versus 0. 9% for Chord Energy Corporation — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CIVI leads at 29. 0% versus 4. 1% for CHRD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CIVI leads at 41. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MNR or SM or CIVI or CHRD or PR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SM Energy Company (SM) trades at 4.
3x forward P/E versus 10. 4x for Permian Resources Corporation — 6. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MNR: 38. 2% to $19. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MNR or SM or CIVI or CHRD or PR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) offers the highest yield at 18. 2%, versus 2. 7% for SM Energy Company (SM).
09Is MNR or SM or CIVI or CHRD or PR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chord Energy Corporation (CHRD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
04), 4. 0% yield, +537. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHRD: +537. 5%, CIVI: -86. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MNR and SM and CIVI and CHRD and PR?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MNR is a small-cap high-growth stock; SM is a small-cap high-growth stock; CIVI is a small-cap high-growth stock; CHRD is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PR is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.