Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MNSB vs MVBF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
MNSB vs MVBF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $175M | $334M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $136M | $270M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $16M | $27M |
| Gross Margin | 54.4% | 71.7% |
| Operating Margin | 14.0% | 13.6% |
| Forward P/E | 10.4x | 15.2x |
| Total Debt | $70M | $77M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25M | $244M |
MNSB vs MVBF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB) | 100 | 177.2 | +77.2% |
| MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) | 100 | 185.8 | +85.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MNSB vs MVBF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MNSB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.66
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 32.0%
- Beta 0.66
MVBF is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 34.6%
- 132.5% 10Y total return vs MNSB's 128.0%
- NIM 3.2% vs MNSB's 3.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.0% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.4x vs 15.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs MVBF's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs MVBF's 0.84 | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +50.7% vs MNSB's +24.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs MVBF's 0.6% |
MNSB vs MVBF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MNSB vs MVBF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MNSB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MVBF is the larger business by revenue, generating $270M annually — 2.0x MNSB's $136M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 11.5% (MNSB) to 10.0% (MVBF).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $136M | $270M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $23M | $39M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $16M | $27M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $13M | $2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.4% | +71.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | +13.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +10.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.8% | +0.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +120.9% | -55.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MNSB and MVBF each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.6x trailing earnings, MVBF trades at a 5% valuation discount to MNSB's 13.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MVBF's 4.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MNSB's 11.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $175M | $334M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $220M | $167M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.27x | 12.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.45x | 15.23x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.52x | 4.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.29x | 1.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.82x | 1.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.46x | 158.05x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MVBF leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MVBF delivers a 8.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $7 for MNSB. MVBF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MNSB's 0.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MVBF scores 7/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.3% | +8.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.0% | +7.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.9% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.32x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $45M | -$167M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25M | $244M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $70M | $77M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.31x | 0.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MVBF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MNSB five years ago would be worth $11,864 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,379 for MVBF. Over the past 12 months, MVBF leads with a +50.7% total return vs MNSB's +24.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MVBF at 17.7% vs MNSB's 6.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.6% | +2.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.1% | +50.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.7% | +63.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.6% | -26.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +128.0% | +132.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.5% | +17.7% |
Risk & Volatility
MNSB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MNSB is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MVBF's 0.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MNSB currently trades 92.8% from its 52-week high vs MVBF's 87.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.66x | 0.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.17 | $29.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.86 | $17.13 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.8% | +87.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.0 | 50.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 59K | 34K |
Analyst Outlook
MNSB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MNSB as "Hold" and MVBF as "Buy". MVBF is the only dividend payer here at 2.56% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $30.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.66 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.0% |
MNSB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). MVBF leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
MNSB vs MVBF: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MNSB or MVBF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MVB Financial Corp.
(MVBF) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) offers the better valuation at 12. 6x trailing P/E (15. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MNSB or MVBF?
On trailing P/E, MVB Financial Corp.
(MVBF) is the cheapest at 12. 6x versus MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. at 13. 3x. On forward P/E, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MNSB or MVBF?
Over the past 5 years, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) delivered a total return of +18. 6%, compared to -26. 2% for MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MVBF returned +135. 5% versus MNSB's +126. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MNSB or MVBF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus MVB Financial Corp. 's 0. 84β — meaning MVBF is approximately 26% more volatile than MNSB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 32% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MNSB or MVBF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MVB Financial Corp.
(MVBF) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to 34. 6% for MVB Financial Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MNSB or MVBF?
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 5% net margin versus 10. 0% for MVB Financial Corp. — meaning it keeps 11. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MNSB leads at 14. 0% versus 13. 6% for MVBF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MVBF leads at 71. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MNSB or MVBF more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) trades at 10. 4x forward P/E versus 15. 2x for MVB Financial Corp. — 4. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — MNSB or MVBF?
In this comparison, MVBF (2.
6% yield) pays a dividend. MNSB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MNSB or MVBF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MVB Financial Corp.
(MVBF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 84), 2. 6% yield, +135. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MVBF: +135. 5%, MNSB: +126. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MNSB and MVBF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock; MVBF is a small-cap high-growth stock. MVBF pays a dividend while MNSB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.