Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MOFG vs BANF vs FFIN vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
MOFG vs BANF vs FFIN vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $1.02B | $3.76B | $4.61B | $24.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $206M | $909M | $739M | $10.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $58M | $238M | $243M | $382M |
| Gross Margin | 29.4% | 68.5% | 70.8% | 38.1% |
| Operating Margin | -40.8% | 30.3% | 36.8% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 13.8x | 15.5x | 15.9x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $117M | $86M | $197M | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $205M | $3.55B | $763M | $599M |
MOFG vs BANF vs FFIN vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MidWestOne Financia… (MOFG) | 100 | 257.0 | +157.0% |
| BancFirst Corporati… (BANF) | 100 | 288.4 | +188.4% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 103.9 | +3.9% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 39.8 | -60.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MOFG vs BANF vs FFIN vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MOFG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +77.6% vs FIS's -35.3%
BANF is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 323.2% 10Y total return vs MOFG's 109.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.93, Low D/E 5.3%, current ratio 0.33x
- NIM 3.3% vs MOFG's 2.5%
- 1.7% ROA vs MOFG's 0.9%, ROIC 12.8% vs -9.4%
FFIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 12.2%
- 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs MOFG's -23.1%
- 30.2% margin vs MOFG's -29.3%
- 2.2% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs FIS's 3.5%
FIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.5%
- PEG 0.31 vs FFIN's 3.05
- Beta 0.76, yield 3.5%, current ratio 0.59x
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 15.9x), PEG 0.31 vs 3.05
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs MOFG's -23.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 15.9x), PEG 0.31 vs 3.05 | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.2% margin vs MOFG's -29.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs MOFG's 1.29 | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +77.6% vs FIS's -35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.7% ROA vs MOFG's 0.9%, ROIC 12.8% vs -9.4% |
MOFG vs BANF vs FFIN vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MOFG vs BANF vs FFIN vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FFIN leads in 1 of 6 categories
FIS leads 1 • BANF leads 1 • MOFG leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 52.9x MOFG's $206M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MOFG's -29.3%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $206M | $909M | $739M | $10.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $74M | $324M | $310M | $3.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $58M | $238M | $243M | $382M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $79M | $196M | $290M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.4% | +68.5% | +70.8% | +38.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -40.8% | +30.3% | +36.8% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -29.3% | +23.8% | +30.2% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.5% | +24.7% | +39.6% | +26.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +113.6% | +5.7% | -7.7% | +92.3% |
Valuation Metrics
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.6x trailing earnings, BANF trades at a 72% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BANF offers better value at 1.81x vs FFIN's 3.98x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $3.8B | $4.6B | $24.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $929M | $294M | $4.0B | $27.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.93x | 17.58x | 20.76x | 63.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.77x | 15.48x | 15.92x | 7.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.81x | 3.98x | 2.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 0.99x | 14.17x | 7.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.94x | 4.14x | 6.23x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.50x | 2.35x | 2.89x | 1.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.74x | 16.75x | 15.73x | 9.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BANF leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BANF delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. BANF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FIS's 0.29x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FFIN scores 6/9 vs MOFG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.0% | +13.3% | +13.3% | +2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +1.7% | +1.6% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.4% | +12.8% | +11.0% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -9.5% | +15.7% | +16.0% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 0.05x | 0.12x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$88M | -$3.5B | -$566M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $205M | $3.6B | $763M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $117M | $86M | $197M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.67x | 1.11x | 1.48x | 4.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MOFG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MOFG five years ago would be worth $17,220 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, MOFG leads with a +77.6% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MOFG at 39.0% vs FIS's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +30.2% | +6.8% | +8.5% | -27.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +77.6% | -4.8% | -3.2% | -35.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +168.6% | +64.4% | +29.1% | -6.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.2% | +65.3% | -28.2% | -63.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +109.8% | +323.2% | +145.4% | -13.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.0% | +18.0% | +8.9% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MOFG and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FIS is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MOFG's 1.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MOFG currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.29x | 0.93x | 0.95x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $49.69 | $138.77 | $38.74 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.52 | $101.48 | $28.11 | $43.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.2% | +81.6% | +83.6% | +57.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.9 | 55.5 | 58.2 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 135K | 740K | 5.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BANF and FFIN and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MOFG as "Buy", BANF as "Hold", FFIN as "Hold", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs -36.6% for MOFG (target: $31). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs BANF's 1.52%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.25 | $95.00 | $39.25 | $67.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 3 | 15 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +1.5% | +2.2% | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 11 | 11 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.97 | $1.72 | $0.72 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FFIN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
MOFG vs BANF vs FFIN vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MOFG or BANF or FFIN or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 18. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). BancFirst Corporation (BANF) offers the better valuation at 17. 6x trailing P/E (15. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MOFG or BANF or FFIN or FIS?
On trailing P/E, BancFirst Corporation (BANF) is the cheapest at 17.
6x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 05x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MOFG or BANF or FFIN or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.
(MOFG) delivered a total return of +72. 2%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BANF returned +323. 2% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MOFG or BANF or FFIN or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. 's 1. 29β — meaning MOFG is approximately 71% more volatile than FIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BancFirst Corporation (BANF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 29% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MOFG or BANF or FFIN or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 18. 8% versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Financial Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 12. 2% year-over-year, compared to -366. 2% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MOFG or BANF or FFIN or FIS?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 2% net margin versus -29. 3% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 36. 8% versus -40. 8% for MOFG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FFIN leads at 70. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MOFG or BANF or FFIN or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 05x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 8. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — MOFG or BANF or FFIN or FIS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 1. 5% for BancFirst Corporation (BANF).
09Is MOFG or BANF or FFIN or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BancFirst Corporation (BANF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
93), 1. 5% yield, +323. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BANF: +323. 2%, MOFG: +109. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MOFG and BANF and FFIN and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (MOFG (Financial Services) and BANF (Financial Services) and FFIN (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MOFG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BANF is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.