MOS vs OLN

For growth investors, The Mosaic Company (MOS) is the stronger pick with 5.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 7% for Olin Corporation (OLN). The Mosaic Company (MOS) offers the better valuation at 6. 1x trailing P/E (16. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Mosaic Company (MOS) a "Hold" — based on 49 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, The Mosaic Company (MOS) delivered a total return of -22.

9%, compared to -29. 4% for Olin Corporation (OLN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OLN returned +67. 4% versus MOS's +12. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Mosaic Company (MOS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

52β versus Olin Corporation's 1. 47β — meaning OLN is approximately 184% more volatile than MOS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Mosaic Company (MOS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 176% for Olin Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Mosaic Company (MOS) is pulling ahead at 5.

0% versus 3. 7% for Olin Corporation (OLN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Mosaic Company grew EPS 605. 5% year-over-year, compared to -140. 7% for Olin Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, OLN leads at -10. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

The Mosaic Company (MOS) is the more profitable company, earning 10.

5% net margin versus -0. 6% for Olin Corporation — meaning it keeps 10. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MOS leads at 9. 9% versus 1. 7% for OLN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MOS leads at 16. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MOS: 32.

6% to $31. 25.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

The Mosaic Company (MOS) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 2. 8% for Olin Corporation (OLN).

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Mosaic Company (MOS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

52), 4. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MOS: +12. 7%, OLN: +67. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MOS is a small-cap deep-value stock; OLN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.