Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MOVE vs MNMD vs LWAY vs HIMS vs JJSF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Packaged Foods
Medical - Equipment & Services
Packaged Foods
MOVE vs MNMD vs LWAY vs HIMS vs JJSF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Biotechnology | Packaged Foods | Medical - Equipment & Services | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $834M | $2.04B | $391M | $6.63B | $1.44B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $500K | $0.00 | $212M | $2.35B | $1.55B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-17M | $-238M | $14M | $128M | $58M |
| Gross Margin | -270.2% | — | 27.4% | 69.7% | 30.5% |
| Operating Margin | -31.6% | — | 7.6% | 4.6% | 5.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 20.7x | 51.5x | 17.5x |
| Total Debt | $186K | $0.00 | $360K | $1.12B | $164M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $258M | $6M | $229M | $106M |
MOVE vs MNMD vs LWAY vs HIMS vs JJSF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Movano Inc. (MOVE) | 100 | 1.7 | -98.3% |
| Mind Medicine (Mind… (MNMD) | 100 | 45.2 | -54.8% |
| Lifeway Foods, Inc. (LWAY) | 100 | 474.8 | +374.8% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 194.0 | +94.0% |
| J&J Snack Foods Cor… (JJSF) | 100 | 48.2 | -51.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MOVE vs MNMD vs LWAY vs HIMS vs JJSF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, MOVE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MNMD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +214.0% vs HIMS's -51.0%
LWAY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 167.1% 10Y total return vs MNMD's 5.1%
- 6.5% margin vs MOVE's -34.1%
- 13.6% ROA vs MOVE's -306.8%
HIMS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
- 59.0% revenue growth vs MNMD's -96.9%
JJSF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.15, yield 4.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.15, Low D/E 16.9%, current ratio 2.72x
- PEG 0.62 vs LWAY's 0.62
- Beta 0.15, yield 4.1%, current ratio 2.72x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs MNMD's -96.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.5x vs 51.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.5% margin vs MOVE's -34.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.15 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield; 21-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +214.0% vs HIMS's -51.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.6% ROA vs MOVE's -306.8% |
MOVE vs MNMD vs LWAY vs HIMS vs JJSF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MOVE vs MNMD vs LWAY vs HIMS vs JJSF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LWAY leads in 2 of 6 categories
JJSF leads 2 • MNMD leads 1 • MOVE leads 0 • HIMS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LWAY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HIMS and MNMD operate at a comparable scale, with $2.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. LWAY is the more profitable business, keeping 6.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MOVE's -34.1%. On growth, MOVE holds the edge at +60.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $500,000 | $0 | $212M | $2.3B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$16M | -$191M | $20M | $164M | $160M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$17M | -$238M | $14M | $128M | $58M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14M | -$174M | $0 | $73M | $90M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | — | +27.4% | +69.7% | +30.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -31.6% | — | +7.6% | +4.6% | +5.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -34.1% | — | +6.5% | +5.5% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -27.1% | — | -7.8% | +3.1% | +5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +60.0% | — | +18.0% | +28.4% | -3.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +53.0% | -163.0% | +15.8% | -27.3% | -64.6% |
Valuation Metrics
JJSF leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.5x trailing earnings, JJSF trades at a 55% valuation discount to HIMS's 50.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JJSF offers better value at 0.79x vs LWAY's 0.86x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $834M | $2.0B | $391M | $6.6B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $827M | $1.8B | $385M | $7.5B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -35.51x | -10.04x | 28.81x | 50.32x | 22.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 20.68x | 51.51x | 17.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.86x | — | 0.79x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 19.12x | 42.68x | 9.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 823.53x | — | 1.84x | 2.82x | 0.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 113.42x | 5.56x | 4.64x | 12.25x | 1.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 89.61x | 17.50x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LWAY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HIMS delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-4 for MOVE. LWAY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MOVE scores 6/9 vs MNMD's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.4% | -102.5% | +17.2% | +23.7% | +6.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.1% | -70.7% | +13.6% | +6.0% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -3.9% | +17.8% | +10.7% | +6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.3% | -52.2% | +19.7% | +10.9% | +7.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | — | 0.00x | 2.07x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | -$258M | -$5M | $892M | $58M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $258M | $6M | $229M | $106M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $186,000 | $0 | $360,000 | $1.1B | $164M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.38x | -21.81x | 256.99x | — | 50.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MNMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LWAY five years ago would be worth $52,703 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $177 for MOVE. Over the past 12 months, MNMD leads with a +214.0% total return vs HIMS's -51.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MNMD at 82.7% vs MOVE's -58.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +57.7% | +51.7% | +12.5% | -23.2% | -15.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +64.9% | +214.0% | +6.1% | -51.0% | -30.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.6% | +510.3% | +327.3% | +116.6% | -48.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.2% | -57.9% | +427.0% | +137.6% | -46.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | +512.1% | +167.1% | +161.9% | -5.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -58.0% | +82.7% | +62.3% | +29.4% | -19.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MNMD and JJSF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JJSF is the less volatile stock with a 0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MNMD currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs HIMS's 36.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.98x | 1.68x | 0.72x | 2.40x | 0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.87 | $21.09 | $34.20 | $70.43 | $129.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.67 | $6.03 | $17.31 | $13.74 | $73.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +39.7% | +98.1% | +75.0% | +36.4% | +58.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.2 | 64.9 | 64.8 | 54.5 | 38.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 70K | 792K | 63K | 34.9M | 254K |
Analyst Outlook
JJSF leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MOVE as "Buy", MNMD as "Buy", LWAY as "Buy", HIMS as "Hold", JJSF as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 36.5% upside for LWAY (target: $35) vs -3.3% for MNMD (target: $20). JJSF is the only dividend payer here at 4.10% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $20.00 | $35.00 | $29.67 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 1 | 6 | 19 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +4.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 2 | — | 21 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $3.11 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.4% | +0.6% |
LWAY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JJSF leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
MOVE vs MNMD vs LWAY vs HIMS vs JJSF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MOVE or MNMD or LWAY or HIMS or JJSF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 5% for J&J Snack Foods Corp. (JJSF). J&J Snack Foods Corp. (JJSF) offers the better valuation at 22. 5x trailing P/E (17. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Movano Inc. (MOVE) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MOVE or MNMD or LWAY or HIMS or JJSF?
On trailing P/E, J&J Snack Foods Corp.
(JJSF) is the cheapest at 22. 5x versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. at 50. 3x. On forward P/E, J&J Snack Foods Corp. is actually cheaper at 17. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: J&J Snack Foods Corp. wins at 0. 62x versus Lifeway Foods, Inc. 's 0. 62x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MOVE or MNMD or LWAY or HIMS or JJSF?
Over the past 5 years, Lifeway Foods, Inc.
(LWAY) delivered a total return of +427. 0%, compared to -98. 2% for Movano Inc. (MOVE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MNMD returned +512. 1% versus MOVE's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MOVE or MNMD or LWAY or HIMS or JJSF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), J&J Snack Foods Corp.
(JJSF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 15β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning HIMS is approximately 1472% more volatile than JJSF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lifeway Foods, Inc. (LWAY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MOVE or MNMD or LWAY or HIMS or JJSF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus 0. 5% for J&J Snack Foods Corp. (JJSF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lifeway Foods, Inc. grew EPS 50. 8% year-over-year, compared to -1273. 3% for Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MOVE or MNMD or LWAY or HIMS or JJSF?
Lifeway Foods, Inc.
(LWAY) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 5% net margin versus -23. 4% for Movano Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LWAY leads at 7. 6% versus -23. 9% for MOVE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HIMS leads at 59. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MOVE or MNMD or LWAY or HIMS or JJSF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, J&J Snack Foods Corp. (JJSF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 62x versus Lifeway Foods, Inc. 's 0. 62x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, J&J Snack Foods Corp. (JJSF) trades at 17. 5x forward P/E versus 51. 5x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 34. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LWAY: 36. 5% to $35. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MOVE or MNMD or LWAY or HIMS or JJSF?
In this comparison, JJSF (4.
1% yield) pays a dividend. MOVE, MNMD, LWAY, HIMS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MOVE or MNMD or LWAY or HIMS or JJSF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, J&J Snack Foods Corp.
(JJSF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 15), 4. 1% yield). Movano Inc. (MOVE) carries a higher beta of 1. 98 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JJSF: -5. 2%, MOVE: -98. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MOVE and MNMD and LWAY and HIMS and JJSF?
These companies operate in different sectors (MOVE (Healthcare) and MNMD (Healthcare) and LWAY (Consumer Defensive) and HIMS (Healthcare) and JJSF (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MOVE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MNMD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LWAY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; JJSF is a small-cap income-oriented stock. JJSF pays a dividend while MOVE, MNMD, LWAY, HIMS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.