Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MPAA vs DORM vs SMP vs LKQ vs DAN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
Auto - Parts
Auto - Parts
Auto - Parts
MPAA vs DORM vs SMP vs LKQ vs DAN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $224M | $3.71B | $895M | $7.37B | $4.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $771M | $2.15B | $1.83B | $13.92B | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $190M | $46M | $517M | $-33M |
| Gross Margin | 19.2% | 40.7% | 30.6% | 37.7% | 8.0% |
| Operating Margin | 6.1% | 15.6% | 10.1% | 7.3% | 2.8% |
| Forward P/E | 15.5x | 15.0x | 9.2x | 9.7x | 13.7x |
| Total Debt | $201M | $633M | $682M | $5.06B | $3.52B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $49M | $72M | $319M | $476M |
MPAA vs DORM vs SMP vs LKQ vs DAN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Motorcar Parts of A… (MPAA) | 100 | 73.7 | -26.3% |
| Dorman Products, In… (DORM) | 100 | 177.5 | +77.5% |
| Standard Motor Prod… (SMP) | 100 | 94.9 | -5.1% |
| LKQ Corporation (LKQ) | 100 | 105.2 | +5.2% |
| Dana Incorporated (DAN) | 100 | 274.5 | +174.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MPAA vs DORM vs SMP vs LKQ vs DAN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, MPAA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
DORM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.00 vs LKQ's 4.10
- Better valuation composite
- 8.8% margin vs MPAA's 0.3%
- 7.6% ROA vs DAN's -0.4%, ROIC 13.9% vs 4.0%
SMP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 3.0%
- Rev growth 22.4%, EPS growth -23.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.84, Low D/E 97.7%, current ratio 2.13x
- Beta 0.84, yield 3.0%, current ratio 2.13x
LKQ ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 4.2% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs SMP's 3.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
DAN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 212.8% 10Y total return vs DORM's 129.0%
- +132.6% vs LKQ's -24.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.4% revenue growth vs DAN's -27.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.8% margin vs MPAA's 0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.84 vs DAN's 1.38, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs SMP's 3.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +132.6% vs LKQ's -24.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.6% ROA vs DAN's -0.4%, ROIC 13.9% vs 4.0% |
MPAA vs DORM vs SMP vs LKQ vs DAN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MPAA vs DORM vs SMP vs LKQ vs DAN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DORM leads in 2 of 6 categories
MPAA leads 1 • DAN leads 1 • SMP leads 1 • LKQ leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DORM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LKQ and DAN operate at a comparable scale, with $13.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. DORM is the more profitable business, keeping 8.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MPAA's 0.3%. On growth, SMP holds the edge at +9.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $771M | $2.2B | $1.8B | $13.9B | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $49M | $377M | $229M | $1.4B | $354M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | $190M | $46M | $517M | -$33M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $30M | $71M | $39M | $808M | $298M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.2% | +40.7% | +30.6% | +37.7% | +8.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +15.6% | +10.1% | +7.3% | +2.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.3% | +8.8% | +2.5% | +3.7% | +1.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +3.3% | +2.2% | +5.8% | +4.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.9% | +4.2% | +9.1% | +0.2% | -3.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.2% | -23.5% | +33.9% | -52.3% | -120.0% |
Valuation Metrics
MPAA leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.3x trailing earnings, LKQ trades at a 77% valuation discount to DAN's 54.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DORM offers better value at 1.25x vs LKQ's 5.18x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $224M | $3.7B | $895M | $7.4B | $4.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $416M | $4.3B | $1.5B | $12.1B | $7.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -11.78x | 18.69x | 21.96x | 12.29x | 54.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.55x | 15.00x | 9.18x | 9.73x | 13.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.25x | — | 5.18x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.26x | 10.38x | 6.60x | 8.11x | 13.48x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.30x | 1.74x | 0.50x | 0.53x | 0.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.89x | 2.58x | 1.30x | 1.13x | 5.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.48x | 49.02x | 47.80x | 8.70x | 15.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DORM leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DORM delivers a 13.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-2 for DAN. DORM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.43x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DAN's 3.82x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MPAA scores 7/9 vs DAN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.8% | +13.1% | +6.6% | +7.9% | -2.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.2% | +7.6% | +2.3% | +3.3% | -0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.2% | +13.9% | +10.8% | +7.2% | +4.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.6% | +18.5% | +12.8% | +9.0% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.78x | 0.43x | 0.98x | 0.77x | 3.82x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $192M | $584M | $610M | $4.7B | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $49M | $72M | $319M | $476M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $201M | $633M | $682M | $5.1B | $3.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.94x | 8.24x | 5.79x | 4.50x | 0.77x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DAN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DAN five years ago would be worth $13,975 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,000 for MPAA. Over the past 12 months, DAN leads with a +132.6% total return vs LKQ's -24.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DAN at 36.7% vs LKQ's -17.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.7% | +0.0% | +9.9% | -2.8% | +40.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.7% | -0.1% | +45.6% | -24.8% | +132.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +147.6% | +41.2% | +19.8% | -43.3% | +155.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.0% | +19.8% | -1.8% | -32.0% | +39.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.1% | +129.0% | +32.7% | +4.2% | +212.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.3% | +12.2% | +6.2% | -17.2% | +36.7% |
Risk & Volatility
SMP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SMP is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DAN's 1.38 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SMP currently trades 87.8% from its 52-week high vs MPAA's 64.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.93x | 0.95x | 0.84x | 0.90x | 1.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.12 | $166.89 | $46.00 | $42.67 | $39.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.25 | $98.44 | $28.08 | $27.23 | $14.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.3% | +74.4% | +87.8% | +67.7% | +87.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.6 | 73.1 | 59.3 | 40.8 | 44.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 87K | 264K | 115K | 2.6M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SMP and LKQ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MPAA as "Buy", DORM as "Buy", SMP as "Buy", LKQ as "Buy", DAN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 71.5% upside for MPAA (target: $20) vs 6.6% for DAN (target: $37). For income investors, LKQ offers the higher dividend yield at 4.19% vs DAN's 1.12%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.00 | $140.00 | — | $36.50 | $37.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 16 | 12 | 22 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +3.0% | +4.2% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 5 | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.21 | $1.21 | $0.39 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.2% | +1.1% | 0.0% | +2.2% | +14.0% |
DORM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MPAA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
MPAA vs DORM vs SMP vs LKQ vs DAN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MPAA or DORM or SMP or LKQ or DAN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Standard Motor Products, Inc.
(SMP) is the stronger pick with 22. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -27. 1% for Dana Incorporated (DAN). LKQ Corporation (LKQ) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. (MPAA) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MPAA or DORM or SMP or LKQ or DAN?
On trailing P/E, LKQ Corporation (LKQ) is the cheapest at 12.
3x versus Dana Incorporated at 54. 2x. On forward P/E, Standard Motor Products, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Dorman Products, Inc. wins at 1. 00x versus LKQ Corporation's 4. 10x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MPAA or DORM or SMP or LKQ or DAN?
Over the past 5 years, Dana Incorporated (DAN) delivered a total return of +39.
7%, compared to -50. 0% for Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. (MPAA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DAN returned +212. 8% versus MPAA's -62. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MPAA or DORM or SMP or LKQ or DAN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Standard Motor Products, Inc.
(SMP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 84β versus Dana Incorporated's 1. 38β — meaning DAN is approximately 63% more volatile than SMP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Dorman Products, Inc. (DORM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 43% versus 4% for Dana Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MPAA or DORM or SMP or LKQ or DAN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Standard Motor Products, Inc.
(SMP) is pulling ahead at 22. 4% versus -27. 1% for Dana Incorporated (DAN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dana Incorporated grew EPS 264. 1% year-over-year, compared to -23. 7% for Standard Motor Products, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMP leads at 9. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MPAA or DORM or SMP or LKQ or DAN?
Dorman Products, Inc.
(DORM) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 6% net margin versus -2. 6% for Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DORM leads at 16. 8% versus 2. 8% for DAN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DORM leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MPAA or DORM or SMP or LKQ or DAN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Dorman Products, Inc. (DORM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 00x versus LKQ Corporation's 4. 10x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Standard Motor Products, Inc. (SMP) trades at 9. 2x forward P/E versus 15. 5x for Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. — 6. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MPAA: 71. 5% to $20. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MPAA or DORM or SMP or LKQ or DAN?
In this comparison, LKQ (4.
2% yield), SMP (3. 0% yield), DAN (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. MPAA, DORM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MPAA or DORM or SMP or LKQ or DAN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Standard Motor Products, Inc.
(SMP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 84), 3. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMP: +32. 7%, MPAA: -62. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MPAA and DORM and SMP and LKQ and DAN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MPAA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DORM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMP is a small-cap high-growth stock; LKQ is a small-cap deep-value stock; DAN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SMP, LKQ, DAN pay a dividend while MPAA, DORM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.