Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MPLT vs ACNB vs PTGX vs TERN vs ACLX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
MPLT vs ACNB vs PTGX vs TERN vs ACLX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Banks - Regional | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.33B | $544M | $6.79B | $4.77B | $6.73B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $170M | $18M | $0.00 | $22M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-103M | $37M | $-115M | $-96M | $-229M |
| Gross Margin | — | 73.7% | 100.0% | — | -64.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | 27.3% | -8.1% | — | -11.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.6x | 25.7x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $7M | $329M | $10M | $919K | $96M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $38M | $21M | $128M | $525M | $80M |
MPLT vs ACNB vs PTGX vs TERN vs ACLX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACNB Corporation (ACNB) | 100 | 161.7 | +61.7% |
| Protagonist Therape… (PTGX) | 100 | 420.8 | +320.8% |
| Terns Pharmaceutica… (TERN) | 100 | 1594.3 | +1494.3% |
| Arcellx, Inc. (ACLX) | 100 | 599.9 | +499.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MPLT vs ACNB vs PTGX vs TERN vs ACLX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MPLT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ACNB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 28.9%, EPS growth -3.5%
- 28.9% NII/revenue growth vs PTGX's -89.4%
- Better valuation composite
- 21.7% margin vs ACLX's -10.3%
PTGX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- beta 0.23
- 8.0% 10Y total return vs ACLX's 5.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.23, Low D/E 1.7%, current ratio 12.71x
- Beta 0.23, current ratio 12.71x
TERN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +18.0% vs ACNB's +22.7%
Among these 5 stocks, ACLX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.9% NII/revenue growth vs PTGX's -89.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.7% margin vs ACLX's -10.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.23 vs ACNB's 0.68, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.0% vs ACNB's +22.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.1% ROA vs MPLT's -69.7%, ROIC 5.3% vs -153.7% |
MPLT vs ACNB vs PTGX vs TERN vs ACLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MPLT vs ACNB vs PTGX vs TERN vs ACLX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACNB leads in 3 of 6 categories
TERN leads 1 • ACLX leads 1 • MPLT leads 0 • PTGX leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACNB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACNB and TERN operate at a comparable scale, with $170M and $0 in trailing revenue. ACNB is the more profitable business, keeping 21.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACLX's -10.3%. On growth, ACLX holds the edge at -89.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $170M | $18M | $0 | $22M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$108M | $53M | -$141M | -$110M | -$246M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$103M | $37M | -$115M | -$96M | -$229M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$113M | $51M | -$116M | -$82M | -$213M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +73.7% | +100.0% | — | -64.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +27.3% | -8.1% | — | -11.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +21.7% | -6.5% | — | -10.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +30.9% | -6.6% | — | -9.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | -100.0% | — | -89.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +35.1% | +126.3% | 0.0% | -13.6% |
Valuation Metrics
ACNB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $544M | $6.8B | $4.8B | $6.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $853M | $6.7B | $4.2B | $6.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -15.66x | 14.61x | -51.49x | -51.41x | -28.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.65x | 25.74x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.32x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 16.03x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.20x | 147.52x | — | 302.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.53x | 1.29x | 10.92x | 4.90x | 16.10x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.36x | 121.04x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACNB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACNB delivers a 9.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-2 for MPLT. TERN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACNB's 0.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACNB scores 5/9 vs ACLX's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | +9.2% | -17.8% | -20.0% | -55.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -69.7% | +1.1% | -16.5% | -19.4% | -36.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -153.7% | +5.3% | -21.8% | -24.7% | -46.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -83.9% | +2.5% | -23.9% | -16.2% | -46.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.78x | 0.02x | 0.00x | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$32M | $308M | -$118M | -$524M | $16M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $38M | $21M | $128M | $525M | $80M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $329M | $10M | $919,000 | $96M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.16x | — | — | -8.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TERN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACLX five years ago would be worth $68,494 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,263 for MPLT. Over the past 12 months, TERN leads with a +1804.7% total return vs ACNB's +22.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TERN at 64.6% vs MPLT's 17.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +62.6% | +12.1% | +21.1% | +32.0% | +81.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +62.6% | +22.7% | +141.1% | +1804.7% | +95.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.6% | +91.0% | +306.4% | +346.1% | +164.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.6% | +105.4% | +246.4% | +232.8% | +584.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.6% | +179.5% | +802.1% | +187.9% | +584.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.6% | +24.1% | +59.6% | +64.6% | +38.4% |
Risk & Volatility
ACLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACLX is the less volatile stock with a -0.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACNB's 0.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACLX currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs MPLT's 88.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | 0.69x | 0.20x | 0.44x | -0.58x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.28 | $53.93 | $107.84 | $53.18 | $115.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.34 | $40.15 | $43.20 | $2.66 | $53.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.0% | +97.5% | +97.9% | +99.6% | +99.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.2 | 57.2 | 54.8 | 73.7 | 79.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 264K | 62K | 726K | 7.0M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACNB as "Buy", PTGX as "Buy", TERN as "Buy", ACLX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 15.4% upside for MPLT (target: $34) vs -2.3% for ACLX (target: $112). ACNB is the only dividend payer here at 2.66% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $33.80 | $58.00 | $115.40 | $55.56 | $112.45 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 26 | 16 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.7% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 8 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.40 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ACNB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TERN leads in 1 (Total Returns).
MPLT vs ACNB vs PTGX vs TERN vs ACLX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MPLT or ACNB or PTGX or TERN or ACLX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ACNB Corporation (ACNB) is the stronger pick with 28.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -89. 4% for Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. (PTGX). ACNB Corporation (ACNB) offers the better valuation at 14. 6x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ACNB Corporation (ACNB) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MPLT or ACNB or PTGX or TERN or ACLX?
On forward P/E, ACNB Corporation is actually cheaper at 9.
6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MPLT or ACNB or PTGX or TERN or ACLX?
Over the past 5 years, Arcellx, Inc.
(ACLX) delivered a total return of +584. 9%, compared to +62. 6% for MapLight Therapeutics, Inc. (MPLT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PTGX returned +773. 3% versus MPLT's +59. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MPLT or ACNB or PTGX or TERN or ACLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Arcellx, Inc.
(ACLX) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 58β versus ACNB Corporation's 0. 69β — meaning ACNB is approximately -219% more volatile than ACLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TERN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 78% for ACNB Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MPLT or ACNB or PTGX or TERN or ACLX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ACNB Corporation (ACNB) is pulling ahead at 28.
9% versus -89. 4% for Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. (PTGX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 8. 0% year-over-year, compared to -148. 5% for Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MPLT or ACNB or PTGX or TERN or ACLX?
ACNB Corporation (ACNB) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
7% net margin versus -1027. 3% for Arcellx, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACNB leads at 27. 3% versus -1135. 6% for ACLX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PTGX leads at 97. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MPLT or ACNB or PTGX or TERN or ACLX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ACNB Corporation (ACNB) trades at 9.
6x forward P/E versus 25. 7x for Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. — 16. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MPLT: 15. 4% to $33. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — MPLT or ACNB or PTGX or TERN or ACLX?
In this comparison, ACNB (2.
7% yield) pays a dividend. MPLT, PTGX, TERN, ACLX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MPLT or ACNB or PTGX or TERN or ACLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Arcellx, Inc.
(ACLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 58), +584. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACLX: +584. 9%, MPLT: +59. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MPLT and ACNB and PTGX and TERN and ACLX?
These companies operate in different sectors (MPLT (Healthcare) and ACNB (Financial Services) and PTGX (Healthcare) and TERN (Healthcare) and ACLX (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MPLT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACNB is a small-cap high-growth stock; PTGX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TERN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACLX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ACNB pays a dividend while MPLT, PTGX, TERN, ACLX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.