Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MPLT vs BIIB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
MPLT vs BIIB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $1.33B | $28.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $9.86B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-103M | $1.37B |
| Gross Margin | — | 69.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | 15.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.1x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $6.95B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $38M | $3.01B |
Quick Verdict: MPLT vs BIIB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MPLT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 62.6% 10Y total return vs BIIB's -28.1%
- Low D/E 5.7%, current ratio 7.20x
- current ratio 7.20x
BIIB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 1.4%, EPS growth -21.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.2%
- 13.9% margin vs MPLT's 3.3%
- 4.7% ROA vs MPLT's -69.7%, ROIC 6.5% vs -153.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Quality / Margins | 13.9% margin vs MPLT's 3.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (5.7% vs 38.1%) | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +62.6% vs BIIB's +59.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs MPLT's -69.7%, ROIC 6.5% vs -153.7% |
MPLT vs BIIB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MPLT vs BIIB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BIIB and MPLT operate at a comparable scale, with $9.9B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $9.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$108M | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$103M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$113M | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +69.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +15.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +13.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +26.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +1.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +31.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MPLT and BIIB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $28.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $32.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -15.66x | 21.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.53x | 1.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 13.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BIIB leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BIIB delivers a 7.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-2 for MPLT. MPLT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BIIB's 0.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BIIB scores 5/9 vs MPLT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | +7.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -69.7% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -153.7% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -83.9% | +7.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$32M | $3.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $38M | $3.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $6.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 6.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MPLT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MPLT five years ago would be worth $16,263 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,830 for BIIB. Over the past 12 months, MPLT leads with a +62.6% total return vs BIIB's +59.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MPLT at 17.6% vs BIIB's -15.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +62.6% | +7.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +62.6% | +59.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.6% | -38.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.6% | -31.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.6% | -28.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.6% | -15.0% |
Risk & Volatility
BIIB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Risk & Volatility
BIIB currently trades 92.9% from its 52-week high vs MPLT's 88.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | 0.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.28 | $205.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.34 | $119.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.0% | +92.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.2 | 68.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 264K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Consensus price targets imply 15.4% upside for MPLT (target: $34) vs 10.8% for BIIB (target: $212).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $33.80 | $212.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BIIB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). MPLT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
MPLT vs BIIB: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MPLT or BIIB a better buy right now?
Biogen Inc.
(BIIB) offers the better valuation at 21. 7x trailing P/E (13. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Biogen Inc. (BIIB) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MPLT or BIIB?
Over the past 5 years, MapLight Therapeutics, Inc.
(MPLT) delivered a total return of +62. 6%, compared to -31. 7% for Biogen Inc. (BIIB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MPLT returned +59. 5% versus BIIB's -27. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MPLT or BIIB?
On balance sheet safety, MapLight Therapeutics, Inc.
(MPLT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 38% for Biogen Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MPLT or BIIB?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Biogen Inc.
grew EPS -21. 1% year-over-year, compared to -39. 6% for MapLight Therapeutics, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MPLT or BIIB?
Biogen Inc.
(BIIB) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 2% net margin versus 0. 0% for MapLight Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BIIB leads at 19. 1% versus 0. 0% for MPLT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BIIB leads at 70. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is MPLT or BIIB more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MPLT: 15.
4% to $33. 80.
07Which pays a better dividend — MPLT or BIIB?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is MPLT or BIIB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Biogen Inc.
(BIIB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 49)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BIIB: -27. 5%, MPLT: +59. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MPLT and BIIB?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.