Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MPTI vs VECO vs PXLW vs CLFD vs TTMI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Communication Equipment
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
MPTI vs VECO vs PXLW vs CLFD vs TTMI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Communication Equipment | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $220M | $3.52B | $36M | $519M | $15.97B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $54M | $655M | $693K | $136M | $3.22B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $23M | $-8M | $-9M | $204M |
| Gross Margin | 44.4% | 38.6% | 85.0% | 37.2% | 20.6% |
| Operating Margin | 18.9% | 2.9% | -16.7% | 1.4% | 9.2% |
| Forward P/E | 31.1x | 34.5x | — | 72.1x | 44.1x |
| Total Debt | $148K | $258M | $298K | $9M | $1.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $21M | $163M | $11M | $21M | $501M |
MPTI vs VECO vs PXLW vs CLFD vs TTMI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| M-tron Industries, … (MPTI) | 100 | 744.3 | +644.3% |
| Veeco Instruments I… (VECO) | 100 | 316.6 | +216.6% |
| Pixelworks, Inc. (PXLW) | 100 | 33.2 | -66.8% |
| Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) | 100 | 30.9 | -69.1% |
| TTM Technologies, I… (TTMI) | 100 | 1004.4 | +904.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MPTI vs VECO vs PXLW vs CLFD vs TTMI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MPTI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.44
- Lower volatility, beta 1.44, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 12.52x
- Beta 1.44, current ratio 12.52x
- Lower P/E (31.1x vs 44.1x)
VECO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, PXLW doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CLFD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 19.6% revenue growth vs PXLW's -98.4%
TTMI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 211.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.2%
- 23.1% 10Y total return vs MPTI's 485.2%
- +493.0% vs PXLW's -8.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.6% revenue growth vs PXLW's -98.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (31.1x vs 44.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.5% margin vs PXLW's -11.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.44 vs TTMI's 3.19, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +493.0% vs PXLW's -8.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.0% ROA vs PXLW's -15.6%, ROIC 25.3% vs -106.5% |
MPTI vs VECO vs PXLW vs CLFD vs TTMI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MPTI vs VECO vs PXLW vs CLFD vs TTMI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MPTI leads in 3 of 6 categories
CLFD leads 1 • TTMI leads 1 • VECO leads 0 • PXLW leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MPTI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TTMI is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 4645.0x PXLW's $693,000. MPTI is the more profitable business, keeping 15.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PXLW's -11.9%. On growth, TTMI holds the edge at +30.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $54M | $655M | $693,000 | $136M | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11M | $39M | -$10M | $6M | $444M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $23M | -$8M | -$9M | $204M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8M | $43M | -$21M | $15M | $79M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.4% | +38.6% | +85.0% | +37.2% | +20.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.9% | +2.9% | -16.7% | +1.4% | +9.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.5% | +3.5% | -11.9% | -6.3% | +6.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +6.5% | -30.4% | +10.8% | +2.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.2% | -5.4% | -3.6% | -27.1% | +30.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.6% | -105.0% | +24.4% | -142.5% | +51.6% |
Valuation Metrics
CLFD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.3x trailing earnings, MPTI trades at a 70% valuation discount to VECO's 97.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MPTI's 17.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VECO's 93.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $220M | $3.5B | $36M | $519M | $16.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $200M | $3.6B | $25M | $506M | $16.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 29.26x | 97.83x | -3.74x | -64.64x | 91.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 31.07x | 34.52x | — | 72.10x | 44.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.67x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.54x | 93.12x | — | 61.46x | 40.56x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.05x | 5.30x | 51.30x | 3.46x | 5.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.91x | 3.95x | 4.12x | 2.05x | 9.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 27.17x | 77.08x | — | 21.01x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MPTI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MPTI delivers a 20.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-34 for PXLW. MPTI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TTMI's 0.63x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLFD scores 7/9 vs PXLW's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.1% | +2.6% | -33.9% | -3.4% | +11.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +18.0% | +1.8% | -15.6% | -3.0% | +5.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +25.3% | +2.8% | -106.5% | +0.6% | +8.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.7% | +3.2% | -26.6% | +0.8% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.29x | 0.04x | 0.03x | 0.63x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$21M | $94M | -$11M | -$13M | $616M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $21M | $163M | $11M | $21M | $501M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $148,000 | $258M | $298,000 | $9M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 3.64x | -886.45x | 85.32x | 6.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TTMI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TTMI five years ago would be worth $101,902 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,396 for PXLW. Over the past 12 months, TTMI leads with a +493.0% total return vs PXLW's -8.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TTMI at 137.6% vs PXLW's -30.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +47.2% | +89.0% | -18.0% | +27.1% | +117.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +36.8% | +205.6% | -8.3% | +20.2% | +493.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +545.9% | +199.8% | -66.6% | +3.9% | +1240.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +485.2% | +154.6% | -86.0% | -4.1% | +919.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +485.2% | +239.9% | -73.6% | +106.7% | +2314.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +86.2% | +44.2% | -30.6% | +1.3% | +137.6% |
Risk & Volatility
MPTI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MPTI is the less volatile stock with a 1.44 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TTMI's 3.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MPTI currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs PXLW's 36.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.44x | 1.97x | 1.83x | 1.79x | 3.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $79.58 | $64.97 | $15.42 | $46.76 | $180.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $36.38 | $18.31 | $4.67 | $24.01 | $25.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.3% | +88.8% | +36.4% | +80.2% | +85.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.7 | 82.2 | 52.9 | 57.1 | 75.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 84K | 1.3M | 43K | 146K | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MPTI as "Buy", VECO as "Buy", PXLW as "Buy", CLFD as "Buy", TTMI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 167.4% upside for PXLW (target: $15) vs -39.8% for VECO (target: $35).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $34.75 | $15.00 | $43.00 | $158.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 36 | 7 | 8 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.2% | +0.1% |
MPTI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CLFD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
MPTI vs VECO vs PXLW vs CLFD vs TTMI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MPTI or VECO or PXLW or CLFD or TTMI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Clearfield, Inc.
(CLFD) is the stronger pick with 19. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -98. 4% for Pixelworks, Inc. (PXLW). M-tron Industries, Inc. (MPTI) offers the better valuation at 29. 3x trailing P/E (31. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate M-tron Industries, Inc. (MPTI) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MPTI or VECO or PXLW or CLFD or TTMI?
On trailing P/E, M-tron Industries, Inc.
(MPTI) is the cheapest at 29. 3x versus Veeco Instruments Inc. at 97. 8x. On forward P/E, M-tron Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 31. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MPTI or VECO or PXLW or CLFD or TTMI?
Over the past 5 years, TTM Technologies, Inc.
(TTMI) delivered a total return of +919. 0%, compared to -86. 0% for Pixelworks, Inc. (PXLW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TTMI returned +23. 1% versus PXLW's -73. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MPTI or VECO or PXLW or CLFD or TTMI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), M-tron Industries, Inc.
(MPTI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 44β versus TTM Technologies, Inc. 's 3. 19β — meaning TTMI is approximately 122% more volatile than MPTI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, M-tron Industries, Inc. (MPTI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 63% for TTM Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MPTI or VECO or PXLW or CLFD or TTMI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Clearfield, Inc.
(CLFD) is pulling ahead at 19. 6% versus -98. 4% for Pixelworks, Inc. (PXLW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TTM Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 211. 1% year-over-year, compared to -52. 0% for Veeco Instruments Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MPTI leads at 19. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MPTI or VECO or PXLW or CLFD or TTMI?
M-tron Industries, Inc.
(MPTI) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus -1190. 3% for Pixelworks, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MPTI leads at 18. 9% versus -1667. 5% for PXLW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PXLW leads at 85. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MPTI or VECO or PXLW or CLFD or TTMI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, M-tron Industries, Inc.
(MPTI) trades at 31. 1x forward P/E versus 72. 1x for Clearfield, Inc. — 41. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PXLW: 167. 4% to $15. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MPTI or VECO or PXLW or CLFD or TTMI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is MPTI or VECO or PXLW or CLFD or TTMI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, M-tron Industries, Inc.
(MPTI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+485. 2% 10Y return). TTM Technologies, Inc. (TTMI) carries a higher beta of 3. 19 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MPTI: +485. 2%, TTMI: +23. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MPTI and VECO and PXLW and CLFD and TTMI?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MPTI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VECO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PXLW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLFD is a small-cap high-growth stock; TTMI is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.