Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MQ vs PRTH

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MQ
Marqeta, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.78B
5Y Perf.-85.1%
PRTH
Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$451M
5Y Perf.-27.9%

MQ vs PRTH — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MQ logoMQ
PRTH logoPRTH
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - Infrastructure
Market Cap$1.78B$451M
Revenue (TTM)$652M$953M
Net Income (TTM)$2M$56M
Gross Margin70.0%21.4%
Operating Margin-4.0%14.8%
Forward P/E250.9x5.8x
Total Debt$22M$1.05B
Cash & Equiv.$982M$77M

MQ vs PRTHLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MQ
PRTH
StockJun 21May 26Return
Marqeta, Inc. (MQ)10014.9-85.1%
Priority Technology… (PRTH)10072.1-27.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MQ vs PRTH

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MQ and PRTH are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MQ
Marqeta, Inc.
The Income Pick

MQ has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.

  • beta 0.87
  • Rev growth 23.3%, EPS growth -157.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -5.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 2.9%, current ratio 1.65x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
PRTH
Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

PRTH is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • -43.8% 10Y total return vs MQ's -86.3%
  • Lower P/E (5.8x vs 250.9x)
  • 5.8% margin vs MQ's 0.3%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMQ logoMQ23.3% revenue growth vs PRTH's 8.3%
ValuePRTH logoPRTHLower P/E (5.8x vs 250.9x)
Quality / MarginsPRTH logoPRTH5.8% margin vs MQ's 0.3%
Stability / SafetyMQ logoMQBeta 0.87 vs PRTH's 2.12
DividendsTieNeither stock pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)MQ logoMQ+2.4% vs PRTH's -10.4%
Efficiency (ROA)PRTH logoPRTH2.6% ROA vs MQ's 0.2%

MQ vs PRTH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MQMarqeta, Inc.
FY 2025
Platform Service Revenue, Net
95.1%$594M
Other Services Revenue
4.9%$31M
PRTHPriority Technology Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Credit Card, Merchant Discount
74.6%$711M
Money Transmissions Services
16.7%$159M
Outsourced Services And Other Services
7.4%$71M
Product
1.3%$12M

MQ vs PRTH — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPRTHLAGGINGMQ

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — MQ and PRTH each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

PRTH and MQ operate at a comparable scale, with $953M and $652M in trailing revenue. PRTH is the more profitable business, keeping 5.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MQ's 0.3%. On growth, MQ holds the edge at +19.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMQ logoMQMarqeta, Inc.PRTH logoPRTHPriority Technolo…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$652M$953M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$5M$204M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$2M$56M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$112M$75M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+70.0%+21.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-4.0%+14.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+0.3%+5.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+17.2%+7.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+19.2%+8.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.2%+3.1%
Evenly matched — MQ and PRTH each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PRTH leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
MetricMQ logoMQMarqeta, Inc.PRTH logoPRTHPriority Technolo…
Market CapShares × price$1.8B$451M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$817M$1.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-139.67x8.10x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.250.90x5.78x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.95x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.84x0.47x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.54x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.05x6.01x
PRTH leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

PRTH leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PRTH scores 6/9 vs MQ's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricMQ logoMQMarqeta, Inc.PRTH logoPRTHPriority Technolo…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+0.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.2%+2.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+13.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-3.1%+16.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–946
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$960M$969M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$982M$77M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$22M$1.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.51x
PRTH leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PRTH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PRTH five years ago would be worth $8,412 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,373 for MQ. Over the past 12 months, MQ leads with a +2.4% total return vs PRTH's -10.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRTH at 14.6% vs MQ's -2.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMQ logoMQMarqeta, Inc.PRTH logoPRTHPriority Technolo…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-9.7%+3.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+2.4%-10.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-6.1%+50.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-86.3%-15.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-86.3%-43.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-2.1%+14.6%
PRTH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MQ and PRTH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MQ is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRTH's 2.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricMQ logoMQMarqeta, Inc.PRTH logoPRTHPriority Technolo…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.87x2.12x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$7.04$8.89
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.70$4.44
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+59.5%+62.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.053.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3.3M252K
Evenly matched — MQ and PRTH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates MQ as "Hold" and PRTH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.6% upside for PRTH (target: $11) vs 13.4% for MQ (target: $5).

MetricMQ logoMQMarqeta, Inc.PRTH logoPRTHPriority Technolo…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$4.75$11.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts225
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises3
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+22.0%+2.3%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

PRTH leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.

Best OverallPriority Technology Holding… (PRTH)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MQ vs PRTH: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MQ or PRTH a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Marqeta, Inc.

(MQ) is the stronger pick with 23. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 3% for Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH). Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (5. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MQ or PRTH?

On forward P/E, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 5. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MQ or PRTH?

Over the past 5 years, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.

(PRTH) delivered a total return of -15. 9%, compared to -86. 3% for Marqeta, Inc. (MQ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRTH returned -43. 8% versus MQ's -86. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MQ or PRTH?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Marqeta, Inc.

(MQ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 12β — meaning PRTH is approximately 144% more volatile than MQ relative to the S&P 500.

05

Which is growing faster — MQ or PRTH?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marqeta, Inc.

(MQ) is pulling ahead at 23. 3% versus 8. 3% for Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 319. 4% year-over-year, compared to -157. 0% for Marqeta, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PRTH leads at 12. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MQ or PRTH?

Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.

(PRTH) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 8% net margin versus -2. 2% for Marqeta, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRTH leads at 14. 8% versus -4. 7% for MQ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRTH leads at 21. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MQ or PRTH more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.

(PRTH) trades at 5. 8x forward P/E versus 250. 9x for Marqeta, Inc. — 245. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRTH: 99. 6% to $11. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MQ or PRTH?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is MQ or PRTH better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Marqeta, Inc.

(MQ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87)). Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) carries a higher beta of 2. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MQ: -86. 3%, PRTH: -43. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MQ and PRTH?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MQ is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRTH is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

MQ

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Gross Margin > 42%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PRTH

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MQ and PRTH on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MQ: 19.2% · PRTH: 8.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.