Comprehensive Stock Comparison

Compare Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) vs AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) Stock

Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.

Tickers 2 / 10100+ Metrics

Selected Stocks

Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Quick Verdict

CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthABBV3.7% revenue growth vs MRK's 1.3%
ValueABBVLower P/E (16.0x vs 24.0x)
Quality / MarginsMRK28.1% net margin vs ABBV's 4.0%
Stability / SafetyABBVBeta 0.42 vs MRK's 0.43
DividendsABBV2.7% yield; 12-year raise streak; MRK pays no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)MRK+37.7% vs ABBV's +14.2%
Bottom line: ABBV leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the stronger pick for investors who prioritize growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Merck & Co., Inc. is the better choice for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. As direct sector peers, they can serve as alternatives in the same portfolio allocation.

Who Each Stock Is For

Income & stability

Growth exposure

Long-term compounding (10Y)

Sleep-well-at-night portfolio

Defensive / Recession hedge

Business Model

What each company does and how it makes money

MRKMerck & Co., Inc.
Healthcare

Merck & Co. is a global pharmaceutical company that develops and markets prescription medicines, vaccines, and animal health products. It generates revenue primarily from its Pharmaceutical segment — including blockbuster cancer drug Keytruda — which accounts for roughly 90% of sales, with the remaining 10% coming from Animal Health products. The company's key competitive advantage lies in its deep oncology franchise, particularly Keytruda's dominant position in immuno-oncology, supported by extensive clinical data and patent protection.

ABBVAbbVie Inc.
Healthcare

AbbVie is a global biopharmaceutical company that develops and markets innovative medicines for serious health conditions. It generates revenue primarily from prescription drug sales — with immunology drugs like Skyrizi and Rinvoq now driving growth as Humira faces biosimilar competition — and also earns income from its aesthetics portfolio including Botox. The company's competitive advantage lies in its deep R&D pipeline, strong patent portfolio, and established commercial infrastructure for launching new blockbuster therapies.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MRKMerck & Co., Inc.
FY 2024
Pharmaceutical segment
89.5%$57.4B
Animal Health segment
9.2%$5.9B
Other Segments
1.4%$891M
ABBVAbbVie Inc.
FY 2024
SKYRIZI
21.6%$11.7B
H U M I R A
16.6%$9.0B
RINVOQ
11.0%$6.0B
Imbruvica
6.2%$3.3B
Botox Therapeutic
6.0%$3.3B
Vraylar
6.0%$3.3B
Other Products
5.6%$3.0B
Other (15)
27.1%$14.7B

Financial Metrics Comparison

Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging

Financial Scorecard

MRK 4ABBV 1
Financial MetricsMRK4/6 metrics
Valuation MetricsMRK4/5 metrics
Profitability & EfficiencyMRK4/6 metrics
Total ReturnsABBV4/6 metrics
Risk & VolatilityTie1/2 metrics
Analyst OutlookMRK1/1 metrics

MRK leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Valuation Metrics). ABBV leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Financial Metrics (TTM)

MRK and ABBV operate at a comparable scale, with $65.0B and $59.6B in trailing revenue. MRK is the more profitable business, keeping 28.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ABBV's 4.0%. On growth, ABBV holds the edge at +9.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMRKMerck & Co., Inc.ABBVAbbVie Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$65.0B$59.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$31.1B$17.3B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$18.3B$2.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$10.5B$20.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+81.5%+69.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+41.2%+15.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+28.1%+4.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+16.2%+34.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+5.0%+9.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-19.6%-88.7%
MRK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

At 17.0x trailing earnings, MRK trades at a 82% valuation discount to ABBV's 97.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MRK's 9.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ABBV's 27.0x.

MetricMRKMerck & Co., Inc.ABBVAbbVie Inc.
Market CapShares × price$307.2B$410.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$307.2B$472.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS17.00x97.08x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.24.05x15.95x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.80x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.89x26.96x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.73x7.28x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share5.98x122.29x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF23.00x
MRK leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ABBV delivers a 62.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $35 for MRK. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ABBV scores 6/9 vs MRK's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricMRKMerck & Co., Inc.ABBVAbbVie Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+35.2%+62.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+32.6%+11.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–926
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage20.17x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$0$62.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$5.5B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$67.8B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense25.93x1.58x
MRK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (with DRIP)

A $10,000 investment in ABBV five years ago would be worth $24,166 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20,074 for MRK. Over the past 12 months, MRK leads with a +37.7% total return vs ABBV's +14.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ABBV at 17.7% vs MRK's 7.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMRKMerck & Co., Inc.ABBVAbbVie Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+16.3%+1.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+37.7%+14.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+25.3%+63.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+100.7%+141.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+210.2%+413.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+7.8%+17.7%
ABBV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

ABBV is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MRK's 0.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MRK currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs ABBV's 94.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMRKMerck & Co., Inc.ABBVAbbVie Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.43x0.42x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$125.14$244.81
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$73.31$164.39
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.9%+94.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.049.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded10.8M5.7M
Evenly matched — MRK and ABBV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Wall Street rates MRK as "Buy" and ABBV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.4% upside for ABBV (target: $256) vs 0.1% for MRK (target: $124). ABBV is the only dividend payer here at 2.68% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricMRKMerck & Co., Inc.ABBVAbbVie Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$123.92$256.15
# AnalystsCovering analysts3639
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1312
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$6.22
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.4%
MRK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Historical Charts

Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.

Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)

StockMar 20Feb 26Change
Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK)100146.11+46.1%
AbbVie Inc. (ABBV)100254.41+154.4%

AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) returned +142% over 5 years vs Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK)'s +101%. A $10,000 investment in ABBV 5 years ago would be worth $24,166 today (including dividends reinvested).

Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years

Stock20162025Change
Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK)$39.8B$65.0B+63.3%
AbbVie Inc. (ABBV)$25.6B$56.3B+119.7%

Merck & Co., Inc.'s revenue grew from $39.8B (2016) to $65.0B (2025) — a 5.6% CAGR.

Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years

Stock20162025Change
Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK)9.8%28.1%+185.1%
AbbVie Inc. (ABBV)23.2%7.6%-67.3%

Merck & Co., Inc.'s net margin went from 10% (2016) to 28% (2025).

Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years

Stock20172025Change
Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK)57.714.5-74.9%
AbbVie Inc. (ABBV)29.374.4+153.9%

Merck & Co., Inc. has traded in a 15x–58x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~17x. AbbVie Inc. has traded in a 17x–74x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~97x.

Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years

Stock20162025Change
Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK)2.047.28+256.9%
AbbVie Inc. (ABBV)3.632.39-34.2%

Merck & Co., Inc.'s EPS grew from $2.04 (2016) to $7.28 (2025) — a 15% CAGR.

Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years

2021
$10B
$22B
2022
$15B
$24B
2023
$9B
$22B
2024
$18B
$18B
2025
$0M
Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK)AbbVie Inc. (ABBV)

Merck & Co., Inc. generated $0M FCF in 2025 (-100% vs 2021). AbbVie Inc. generated $18B FCF in 2024 (-19% vs 2021).

Loading custom metrics...

MRK vs ABBV: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MRK or ABBV a better buy right now?

Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) offers the better valuation at 17.0x trailing P/E (24.0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MRK or ABBV?

On trailing P/E, Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) is the cheapest at 17.0x versus AbbVie Inc. at 97.1x. On forward P/E, AbbVie Inc. is actually cheaper at 16.0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MRK or ABBV?

Over the past 5 years, AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) delivered a total return of +141.7%, compared to +100.7% for Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK). A $10,000 investment in ABBV five years ago would be worth approximately $24K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABBV returned +413.0% versus MRK's +210.2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MRK or ABBV?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) is the lower-risk stock at 0.42β versus Merck & Co., Inc.'s 0.43β — meaning MRK is approximately 2% more volatile than ABBV relative to the S&P 500.

05

Which has better profit margins — MRK or ABBV?

Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) is the more profitable company, earning 28.1% net margin versus 7.6% for AbbVie Inc. — meaning it keeps 28.1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MRK leads at 41.2% versus 16.2% for ABBV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MRK leads at 81.5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is MRK or ABBV more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) trades at 16.0x forward P/E versus 24.0x for Merck & Co., Inc. — 8.1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ABBV: 10.4% to $256.15.

07

Which pays a better dividend — MRK or ABBV?

In this comparison, ABBV (2.7% yield) pays a dividend. MRK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is MRK or ABBV better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.42), 2.7% yield, +413.0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +413.0%, MRK: +210.2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between MRK and ABBV?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: MRK is a large-cap deep-value stock; ABBV is a large-cap quality compounder stock. ABBV pays a dividend while MRK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.

💎
Stocks Like

MRK

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 16%
Run This Screen
💰
Stocks Like

ABBV

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 41%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Better Than Both

Find stocks that beat MRK and ABBV on the metrics you choose

Revenue Growth>
%
(MRK: 5.0% · ABBV: 9.1%)
Net Margin>
%
(MRK: 28.1% · ABBV: 4.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(MRK: 17.0x · ABBV: 97.1x)