Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
MRT logo
MRT
LYFT logo
LYFT
UBER logo
UBER
BIRD logo
BIRD
GRAB logo
GRAB
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MRT vs LYFT vs UBER vs BIRD vs GRAB

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MRT
Marti Technologies, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyAMEX • TR
Market Cap$146M
5Y Perf.-82.4%
LYFT
Lyft, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.14B
5Y Perf.-66.7%
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$142.62B
5Y Perf.+81.2%
BIRD
Allbirds, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$31M
5Y Perf.-99.0%
GRAB
Grab Holdings Limited

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • SG
Market Cap$13.11B
5Y Perf.-74.1%

MRT vs LYFT vs UBER vs BIRD vs GRAB — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MRT logoMRT
LYFT logoLYFT
UBER logoUBER
BIRD logoBIRD
GRAB logoGRAB
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - Application
Market Cap$146M$5.14B$142.62B$31M$13.11B
Revenue (TTM)$35M$6.52B$53.69B$143M$3.55B
Net Income (TTM)$-53M$2.86B$8.54B$-76M$379M
Gross Margin47.5%43.2%41.0%37.1%43.5%
Operating Margin-101.9%-2.5%11.7%-51.0%5.7%
Forward P/E22.1x20.7x30.6x
Total Debt$87M$1.28B$13.47B$40M$2.05B
Cash & Equiv.$8M$1.13B$7.74B$27M$3.43B

MRT vs LYFT vs UBER vs BIRD vs GRABLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MRT
LYFT
UBER
BIRD
GRAB
StockNov 21Jun 26Return
Marti Technologies,… (MRT)10017.6-82.4%
Lyft, Inc. (LYFT)10033.3-66.7%
Uber Technologies, … (UBER)100181.2+81.2%
Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD)1001.0-99.0%
Grab Holdings Limit… (GRAB)10025.9-74.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MRT vs LYFT vs UBER vs BIRD vs GRAB

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LYFT leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. Marti Technologies, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. UBER also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇LYFT emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
MRT
Marti Technologies, Inc.
The Income Pick

MRT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.62
  • Beta 0.62, current ratio 0.97x
  • 110.3% revenue growth vs BIRD's -19.7%
  • Beta 0.62 vs BIRD's 1.81
Best for: income & stability and defensive
LYFT
Lyft, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

LYFT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.

  • 43.8% margin vs MRT's -151.1%
  • -12.3% vs BIRD's -69.0%
  • 39.1% ROA vs MRT's -264.1%, ROIC -6.1% vs -147.7%
Best for: quality and momentum
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

UBER ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 65.6% 10Y total return vs GRAB's -72.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 48.0%, current ratio 1.14x
  • Lower P/E (20.7x vs 30.6x)
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
BIRD
Allbirds, Inc.
The Technology Pick

BIRD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
GRAB
Grab Holdings Limited
The Growth Play

GRAB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 20.5%, EPS growth 342.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.0%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMRT logoMRT110.3% revenue growth vs BIRD's -19.7%
ValueUBER logoUBERLower P/E (20.7x vs 30.6x)
Quality / MarginsLYFT logoLYFT43.8% margin vs MRT's -151.1%
Stability / SafetyMRT logoMRTBeta 0.62 vs BIRD's 1.81
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)LYFT logoLYFT-12.3% vs BIRD's -69.0%
Efficiency (ROA)LYFT logoLYFT39.1% ROA vs MRT's -264.1%, ROIC -6.1% vs -147.7%

MRT vs LYFT vs UBER vs BIRD vs GRAB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Autonomous Vehicle Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Autonomous Vehicle Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
MRTMarti Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Other Member
50.3%$298,798
Fuel
32.5%$192,849
Electricity
17.2%$102,030
LYFTLyft, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

UBERUber Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Mobility
57.0%$29.7B
Delivery
33.2%$17.2B
Freight
9.8%$5.1B
BIRDAllbirds, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$152M
GRABGrab Holdings Limited
FY 2025
Deliveries
53.5%$1.8B
Mobility
36.2%$1.2B
Financial Services
10.3%$347M

MRT vs LYFT vs UBER vs BIRD vs GRAB — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLUBERLAGGINGGRAB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — MRT and UBER each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

UBER is the larger business by revenue, generating $53.7B annually — 1539.2x MRT's $35M. LYFT is the more profitable business, keeping 43.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MRT's -151.1%. On growth, MRT holds the edge at +115.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMRT logoMRTMarti Technologie…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…BIRD logoBIRDAllbirds, Inc.GRAB logoGRABGrab Holdings Lim…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$35M$6.5B$53.7B$143M$3.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$31M-$63M$7.0B-$65M$395M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$53M$2.9B$8.5B-$76M$379M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$18M$1.2B$9.8B-$42M-$88M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+47.5%+43.2%+41.0%+37.1%+43.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-101.9%-2.5%+11.7%-51.0%+5.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-151.1%+43.8%+15.9%-53.4%+10.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-53.0%+17.7%+18.3%-29.3%-2.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+115.4%+13.8%+14.5%-30.5%+23.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+33.6%-84.3%+12.5%+2.1%
Evenly matched — MRT and UBER each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — UBER and BIRD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 2.0x trailing earnings, LYFT trades at a 96% valuation discount to GRAB's 51.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UBER's 23.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GRAB's 30.9x.

MetricMRT logoMRTMarti Technologie…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…BIRD logoBIRDAllbirds, Inc.GRAB logoGRABGrab Holdings Lim…
Market CapShares × price$146M$5.1B$142.6B$31M$13.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$225M$5.3B$148.3B$43M$11.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-3.21x1.99x14.56x-0.39x51.81x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.11x20.75x30.58x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple23.50x30.95x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.73x0.81x2.74x0.20x3.89x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.73x5.20x0.83x2.05x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF4.61x14.61x97.84x
Evenly matched — UBER and BIRD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

UBER leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

LYFT delivers a 150.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $150 in annual profit, vs $-174 for BIRD. GRAB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BIRD's 1.10x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UBER scores 7/9 vs BIRD's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricMRT logoMRTMarti Technologie…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…BIRD logoBIRDAllbirds, Inc.GRAB logoGRABGrab Holdings Lim…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+150.2%+32.0%-173.5%+5.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-2.6%+39.1%+14.2%-67.5%+3.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-147.7%-6.1%+13.6%-82.0%+3.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-138.0%-6.2%+12.5%-70.5%+2.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–954724
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.39x0.48x1.10x0.30x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$79M$145M$5.7B$13M-$1.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$8M$1.1B$7.7B$27M$3.4B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$87M$1.3B$13.5B$40M$2.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-2.71x-5.32x11.51x-32.09x2.96x
UBER leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

UBER leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in UBER five years ago would be worth $13,561 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $63 for BIRD. Over the past 12 months, LYFT leads with a -12.3% total return vs BIRD's -69.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UBER at 18.2% vs BIRD's -47.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMRT logoMRTMarti Technologie…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…BIRD logoBIRDAllbirds, Inc.GRAB logoGRABGrab Holdings Lim…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-26.7%-31.6%-16.9%-11.2%-35.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-37.5%-12.3%-19.6%-69.0%-28.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-83.9%+29.6%+64.9%-85.6%-4.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-82.5%-76.8%+35.6%-99.4%-71.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-63.0%-82.7%+65.6%-99.4%-72.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-45.5%+9.0%+18.2%-47.6%-1.4%
UBER leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MRT and UBER each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MRT is the less volatile stock with a 0.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BIRD's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UBER currently trades 67.5% from its 52-week high vs BIRD's 15.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMRT logoMRTMarti Technologie…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…BIRD logoBIRDAllbirds, Inc.GRAB logoGRABGrab Holdings Lim…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.62x1.37x1.03x1.81x1.51x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.15$25.54$101.99$24.31$6.62
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.55$12.46$67.19$2.15$3.18
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+54.0%+53.0%+67.5%+15.1%+49.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10038.148.240.742.238.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded25K13.7M15.9M7.4M48.9M
Evenly matched — MRT and UBER each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: MRT as "Hold", LYFT as "Hold", UBER as "Buy", GRAB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 88.2% upside for MRT (target: $3) vs 29.8% for LYFT (target: $18).

MetricMRT logoMRTMarti Technologie…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…BIRD logoBIRDAllbirds, Inc.GRAB logoGRABGrab Holdings Lim…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$3.20$17.58$101.95$5.85
# AnalystsCovering analysts1596112
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.3%+9.7%+4.6%0.0%+2.1%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

UBER leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 3 categories are tied.

Best OverallUber Technologies, Inc. (UBER)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MRT vs LYFT vs UBER vs BIRD vs GRAB: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MRT or LYFT or UBER or BIRD or GRAB a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Marti Technologies, Inc.

(MRT) is the stronger pick with 110. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 7% for Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD). Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) offers the better valuation at 2. 0x trailing P/E (22. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MRT or LYFT or UBER or BIRD or GRAB?

On trailing P/E, Lyft, Inc.

(LYFT) is the cheapest at 2. 0x versus Grab Holdings Limited at 51. 8x. On forward P/E, Uber Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MRT or LYFT or UBER or BIRD or GRAB?

Over the past 5 years, Uber Technologies, Inc.

(UBER) delivered a total return of +35. 6%, compared to -99. 4% for Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UBER returned +65. 6% versus BIRD's -99. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MRT or LYFT or UBER or BIRD or GRAB?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Marti Technologies, Inc.

(MRT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 62β versus Allbirds, Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning BIRD is approximately 193% more volatile than MRT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 110% for Allbirds, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MRT or LYFT or UBER or BIRD or GRAB?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marti Technologies, Inc.

(MRT) is pulling ahead at 110. 3% versus -19. 7% for Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lyft, Inc. grew EPS 122. 6% year-over-year, compared to 3. 7% for Uber Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GRAB leads at 33. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MRT or LYFT or UBER or BIRD or GRAB?

Lyft, Inc.

(LYFT) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 0% net margin versus -105. 6% for Marti Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UBER leads at 10. 7% versus -51. 0% for MRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GRAB leads at 43. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MRT or LYFT or UBER or BIRD or GRAB more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Uber Technologies, Inc.

(UBER) trades at 20. 7x forward P/E versus 30. 6x for Grab Holdings Limited — 9. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MRT: 88. 2% to $3. 20.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MRT or LYFT or UBER or BIRD or GRAB?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is MRT or LYFT or UBER or BIRD or GRAB better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Marti Technologies, Inc.

(MRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 62)). Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MRT: -63. 0%, BIRD: -99. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MRT and LYFT and UBER and BIRD and GRAB?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MRT is a small-cap high-growth stock; LYFT is a small-cap deep-value stock; UBER is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BIRD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GRAB is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.