Software - Application
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MRT vs LYFT vs UBER vs BIRD vs GRAB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
MRT vs LYFT vs UBER vs BIRD vs GRAB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $146M | $5.14B | $142.62B | $31M | $13.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $35M | $6.52B | $53.69B | $143M | $3.55B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-53M | $2.86B | $8.54B | $-76M | $379M |
| Gross Margin | 47.5% | 43.2% | 41.0% | 37.1% | 43.5% |
| Operating Margin | -101.9% | -2.5% | 11.7% | -51.0% | 5.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.1x | 20.7x | — | 30.6x |
| Total Debt | $87M | $1.28B | $13.47B | $40M | $2.05B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $1.13B | $7.74B | $27M | $3.43B |
MRT vs LYFT vs UBER vs BIRD vs GRAB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marti Technologies,… (MRT) | 100 | 17.6 | -82.4% |
| Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) | 100 | 33.3 | -66.7% |
| Uber Technologies, … (UBER) | 100 | 181.2 | +81.2% |
| Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD) | 100 | 1.0 | -99.0% |
| Grab Holdings Limit… (GRAB) | 100 | 25.9 | -74.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MRT vs LYFT vs UBER vs BIRD vs GRAB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MRT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.62
- Beta 0.62, current ratio 0.97x
- 110.3% revenue growth vs BIRD's -19.7%
- Beta 0.62 vs BIRD's 1.81
LYFT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- 43.8% margin vs MRT's -151.1%
- -12.3% vs BIRD's -69.0%
- 39.1% ROA vs MRT's -264.1%, ROIC -6.1% vs -147.7%
UBER ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 65.6% 10Y total return vs GRAB's -72.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 48.0%, current ratio 1.14x
- Lower P/E (20.7x vs 30.6x)
BIRD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
GRAB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 20.5%, EPS growth 342.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 110.3% revenue growth vs BIRD's -19.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.7x vs 30.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 43.8% margin vs MRT's -151.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.62 vs BIRD's 1.81 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -12.3% vs BIRD's -69.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 39.1% ROA vs MRT's -264.1%, ROIC -6.1% vs -147.7% |
MRT vs LYFT vs UBER vs BIRD vs GRAB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MRT vs LYFT vs UBER vs BIRD vs GRAB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
UBER leads in 2 of 6 categories
MRT leads 0 • LYFT leads 0 • BIRD leads 0 • GRAB leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MRT and UBER each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UBER is the larger business by revenue, generating $53.7B annually — 1539.2x MRT's $35M. LYFT is the more profitable business, keeping 43.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MRT's -151.1%. On growth, MRT holds the edge at +115.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $35M | $6.5B | $53.7B | $143M | $3.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$31M | -$63M | $7.0B | -$65M | $395M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$53M | $2.9B | $8.5B | -$76M | $379M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$18M | $1.2B | $9.8B | -$42M | -$88M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.5% | +43.2% | +41.0% | +37.1% | +43.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -101.9% | -2.5% | +11.7% | -51.0% | +5.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -151.1% | +43.8% | +15.9% | -53.4% | +10.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -53.0% | +17.7% | +18.3% | -29.3% | -2.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +115.4% | +13.8% | +14.5% | -30.5% | +23.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.6% | — | -84.3% | +12.5% | +2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — UBER and BIRD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.0x trailing earnings, LYFT trades at a 96% valuation discount to GRAB's 51.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UBER's 23.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GRAB's 30.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $146M | $5.1B | $142.6B | $31M | $13.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $225M | $5.3B | $148.3B | $43M | $11.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.21x | 1.99x | 14.56x | -0.39x | 51.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.11x | 20.75x | — | 30.58x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 23.50x | — | 30.95x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.73x | 0.81x | 2.74x | 0.20x | 3.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.73x | 5.20x | 0.83x | 2.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 4.61x | 14.61x | — | 97.84x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UBER leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LYFT delivers a 150.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $150 in annual profit, vs $-174 for BIRD. GRAB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BIRD's 1.10x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UBER scores 7/9 vs BIRD's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +150.2% | +32.0% | -173.5% | +5.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.6% | +39.1% | +14.2% | -67.5% | +3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -147.7% | -6.1% | +13.6% | -82.0% | +3.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -138.0% | -6.2% | +12.5% | -70.5% | +2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.39x | 0.48x | 1.10x | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $79M | $145M | $5.7B | $13M | -$1.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $1.1B | $7.7B | $27M | $3.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $87M | $1.3B | $13.5B | $40M | $2.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.71x | -5.32x | 11.51x | -32.09x | 2.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UBER leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UBER five years ago would be worth $13,561 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $63 for BIRD. Over the past 12 months, LYFT leads with a -12.3% total return vs BIRD's -69.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UBER at 18.2% vs BIRD's -47.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -26.7% | -31.6% | -16.9% | -11.2% | -35.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -37.5% | -12.3% | -19.6% | -69.0% | -28.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.9% | +29.6% | +64.9% | -85.6% | -4.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.5% | -76.8% | +35.6% | -99.4% | -71.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.0% | -82.7% | +65.6% | -99.4% | -72.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -45.5% | +9.0% | +18.2% | -47.6% | -1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MRT and UBER each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MRT is the less volatile stock with a 0.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BIRD's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UBER currently trades 67.5% from its 52-week high vs BIRD's 15.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.62x | 1.37x | 1.03x | 1.81x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.15 | $25.54 | $101.99 | $24.31 | $6.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.55 | $12.46 | $67.19 | $2.15 | $3.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.0% | +53.0% | +67.5% | +15.1% | +49.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.1 | 48.2 | 40.7 | 42.2 | 38.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 25K | 13.7M | 15.9M | 7.4M | 48.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MRT as "Hold", LYFT as "Hold", UBER as "Buy", GRAB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 88.2% upside for MRT (target: $3) vs 29.8% for LYFT (target: $18).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.20 | $17.58 | $101.95 | — | $5.85 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 59 | 61 | — | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +9.7% | +4.6% | 0.0% | +2.1% |
UBER leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 3 categories are tied.
MRT vs LYFT vs UBER vs BIRD vs GRAB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MRT or LYFT or UBER or BIRD or GRAB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Marti Technologies, Inc.
(MRT) is the stronger pick with 110. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 7% for Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD). Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) offers the better valuation at 2. 0x trailing P/E (22. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MRT or LYFT or UBER or BIRD or GRAB?
On trailing P/E, Lyft, Inc.
(LYFT) is the cheapest at 2. 0x versus Grab Holdings Limited at 51. 8x. On forward P/E, Uber Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MRT or LYFT or UBER or BIRD or GRAB?
Over the past 5 years, Uber Technologies, Inc.
(UBER) delivered a total return of +35. 6%, compared to -99. 4% for Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UBER returned +65. 6% versus BIRD's -99. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MRT or LYFT or UBER or BIRD or GRAB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Marti Technologies, Inc.
(MRT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 62β versus Allbirds, Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning BIRD is approximately 193% more volatile than MRT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 110% for Allbirds, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MRT or LYFT or UBER or BIRD or GRAB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marti Technologies, Inc.
(MRT) is pulling ahead at 110. 3% versus -19. 7% for Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lyft, Inc. grew EPS 122. 6% year-over-year, compared to 3. 7% for Uber Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GRAB leads at 33. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MRT or LYFT or UBER or BIRD or GRAB?
Lyft, Inc.
(LYFT) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 0% net margin versus -105. 6% for Marti Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UBER leads at 10. 7% versus -51. 0% for MRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GRAB leads at 43. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MRT or LYFT or UBER or BIRD or GRAB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Uber Technologies, Inc.
(UBER) trades at 20. 7x forward P/E versus 30. 6x for Grab Holdings Limited — 9. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MRT: 88. 2% to $3. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — MRT or LYFT or UBER or BIRD or GRAB?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is MRT or LYFT or UBER or BIRD or GRAB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Marti Technologies, Inc.
(MRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 62)). Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MRT: -63. 0%, BIRD: -99. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MRT and LYFT and UBER and BIRD and GRAB?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MRT is a small-cap high-growth stock; LYFT is a small-cap deep-value stock; UBER is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BIRD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GRAB is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.