Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MRVI vs NUVL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
MRVI vs NUVL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $436M | $7.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $186M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-131M | $-450M |
| Gross Margin | 18.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -115.9% | — |
| Total Debt | $36M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $217M | $262M |
MRVI vs NUVL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maravai LifeScience… (MRVI) | 100 | 9.0 | -91.0% |
| Nuvalent, Inc. (NUVL) | 100 | 561.1 | +461.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MRVI vs NUVL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MRVI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -80.8%, EPS growth 77.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -61.6%
- +85.8% vs NUVL's +53.5%
NUVL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.09
- 446.1% 10Y total return vs MRVI's -86.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.09, current ratio 15.27x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.1% revenue growth vs MRVI's -80.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs MRVI's -70.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.09 vs MRVI's 2.03 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +85.8% vs NUVL's +53.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -37.8% ROA vs MRVI's -187.0%, ROIC -32.5% vs -39.2% |
MRVI vs NUVL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MRVI vs NUVL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NUVL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MRVI and NUVL operate at a comparable scale, with $186M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $186M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$230M | -$346M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$131M | -$450M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$46M | -$313M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.3% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -115.9% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -70.4% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -24.7% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.6% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.3% | -17.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MRVI and NUVL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $436M | $7.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $255M | $7.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -16.42x | -17.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.75x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.53x | 5.96x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — MRVI and NUVL each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MRVI delivers a -35.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-35 in annual profit, vs $-43 for NUVL. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MRVI scores 2/9 vs NUVL's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -35.1% | -42.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -187.0% | -37.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -39.2% | -32.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -25.7% | -34.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$181M | -$262M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $217M | $262M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $36M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.92x | -26.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NUVL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NUVL five years ago would be worth $54,613 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,061 for MRVI. Over the past 12 months, MRVI leads with a +85.8% total return vs NUVL's +53.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NUVL at 39.5% vs MRVI's -34.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.9% | +1.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +85.8% | +53.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.7% | +171.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.4% | +446.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.8% | +446.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -34.3% | +39.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MRVI and NUVL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NUVL is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MRVI's 2.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MRVI currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs NUVL's 90.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.03x | 1.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.11 | $113.02 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.95 | $63.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.0% | +90.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.7 | 52.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 544K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MRVI as "Buy" and NUVL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 41.0% upside for NUVL (target: $144) vs 14.2% for MRVI (target: $5).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $4.50 | $144.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
NUVL leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Total Returns. 3 categories are tied.
MRVI vs NUVL: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MRVI or NUVL a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Maravai LifeSciences Holdings, Inc.
(MRVI) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MRVI or NUVL?
Over the past 5 years, Nuvalent, Inc.
(NUVL) delivered a total return of +446. 1%, compared to -89. 4% for Maravai LifeSciences Holdings, Inc. (MRVI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NUVL returned +446. 1% versus MRVI's -86. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MRVI or NUVL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nuvalent, Inc.
(NUVL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 09β versus Maravai LifeSciences Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 03β — meaning MRVI is approximately 86% more volatile than NUVL relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — MRVI or NUVL?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Maravai LifeSciences Holdings, Inc.
grew EPS 77. 1% year-over-year, compared to -48. 9% for Nuvalent, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MRVI or NUVL?
Nuvalent, Inc.
(NUVL) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -262. 2% for Maravai LifeSciences Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NUVL leads at 0. 0% versus -431. 7% for MRVI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MRVI leads at 25. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MRVI or NUVL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is MRVI or NUVL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nuvalent, Inc.
(NUVL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09), +446. 1% 10Y return). Maravai LifeSciences Holdings, Inc. (MRVI) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NUVL: +446. 1%, MRVI: -86. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MRVI and NUVL?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.