Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MRVL vs AVGO vs QCOM vs MCHP vs SWKS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
MRVL vs AVGO vs QCOM vs MCHP vs SWKS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $138.57B | $1.96T | $213.51B | $54.97B | $9.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.19B | $68.28B | $44.49B | $4.37B | $4.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.67B | $24.97B | $9.92B | $-97M | $361M |
| Gross Margin | 51.0% | 67.1% | 54.8% | 51.6% | 41.1% |
| Operating Margin | 16.1% | 40.9% | 25.5% | 4.1% | 9.4% |
| Forward P/E | 41.7x | 36.5x | 18.8x | 64.8x | 13.8x |
| Total Debt | $4.47B | $65.14B | $16.37B | $5.67B | $1.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.64B | $16.18B | $7.84B | $772M | $1.16B |
MRVL vs AVGO vs QCOM vs MCHP vs SWKS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marvell Technology,… (MRVL) | 100 | 490.5 | +390.5% |
| Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) | 100 | 1416.3 | +1316.3% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 100 | 250.5 | +150.5% |
| Microchip Technolog… (MCHP) | 100 | 211.6 | +111.6% |
| Skyworks Solutions,… (SWKS) | 100 | 54.9 | -45.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MRVL vs AVGO vs QCOM vs MCHP vs SWKS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MRVL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 42.1%, EPS growth 401.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.4%
- 42.1% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3%
- +184.6% vs SWKS's +1.5%
AVGO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 29.0% 10Y total return vs MRVL's 15.8%
- PEG 0.73 vs QCOM's 9.06
- 36.6% margin vs MCHP's -2.2%
QCOM is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 18.4% ROA vs MCHP's -0.7%, ROIC 29.1% vs 1.8%
Among these 5 stocks, MCHP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SWKS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.36, yield 4.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.36, Low D/E 20.9%, current ratio 2.33x
- Beta 1.36, yield 4.3%, current ratio 2.33x
- Lower P/E (13.8x vs 64.8x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 42.1% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.8x vs 64.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.6% margin vs MCHP's -2.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.36 vs MRVL's 2.21, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.3% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs QCOM's 1.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +184.6% vs SWKS's +1.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.4% ROA vs MCHP's -0.7%, ROIC 29.1% vs 1.8% |
MRVL vs AVGO vs QCOM vs MCHP vs SWKS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MRVL vs AVGO vs QCOM vs MCHP vs SWKS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AVGO leads in 2 of 6 categories
SWKS leads 1 • QCOM leads 1 • MRVL leads 0 • MCHP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVGO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVGO is the larger business by revenue, generating $68.3B annually — 16.9x SWKS's $4.0B. AVGO is the more profitable business, keeping 36.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MCHP's -2.2%. On growth, AVGO holds the edge at +29.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.2B | $68.3B | $44.5B | $4.4B | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.3B | $38.8B | $12.8B | $881M | $842M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.7B | $25.0B | $9.9B | -$97M | $361M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.4B | $28.9B | $12.5B | $820M | $697M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.0% | +67.1% | +54.8% | +51.6% | +41.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.1% | +40.9% | +25.5% | +4.1% | +9.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +32.6% | +36.6% | +22.3% | -2.2% | +8.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.0% | +42.3% | +28.1% | +18.8% | +17.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.1% | +29.5% | -3.5% | +15.6% | -1.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | +31.6% | +173.0% | +164.2% | -44.2% |
Valuation Metrics
SWKS leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.1x trailing earnings, SWKS trades at a 76% valuation discount to AVGO's 86.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AVGO offers better value at 1.73x vs QCOM's 19.44x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $138.6B | $1.96T | $213.5B | $55.0B | $9.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $140.4B | $2.00T | $222.0B | $59.9B | $9.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 52.12x | 86.49x | 40.43x | -9999.00x | 21.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 41.72x | 36.45x | 18.84x | 64.79x | 13.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.73x | 19.44x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 106.14x | 58.52x | 15.91x | 57.21x | 10.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 16.91x | 30.62x | 4.82x | 12.49x | 2.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.73x | 24.63x | 10.56x | 7.71x | 1.75x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 99.24x | 72.67x | 16.65x | 71.19x | 8.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
QCOM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QCOM delivers a 40.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $-1 for MCHP. SWKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AVGO's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AVGO scores 8/9 vs SWKS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.4% | +32.9% | +40.2% | -1.4% | +6.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.6% | +14.9% | +18.4% | -0.7% | +4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.0% | +14.9% | +29.1% | +1.8% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.1% | +16.9% | +28.9% | +2.1% | +7.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.31x | 0.80x | 0.77x | 0.80x | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.8B | $49.0B | $8.5B | $4.9B | $42M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.6B | $16.2B | $7.8B | $772M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.5B | $65.1B | $16.4B | $5.7B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 15.17x | 9.24x | 17.60x | 0.78x | 14.46x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AVGO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AVGO five years ago would be worth $93,355 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,449 for SWKS. Over the past 12 months, MRVL leads with a +184.6% total return vs SWKS's +1.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AVGO at 88.2% vs SWKS's -11.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +79.1% | +18.9% | +17.6% | +56.9% | +2.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +184.6% | +102.6% | +42.9% | +115.1% | +1.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +291.9% | +566.4% | +96.4% | +43.9% | -30.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +250.8% | +833.6% | +58.5% | +45.7% | -55.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1581.3% | +2897.3% | +350.2% | +373.8% | +31.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +57.7% | +88.2% | +25.2% | +12.9% | -11.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MCHP and SWKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SWKS is the less volatile stock with a 1.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MRVL's 2.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MCHP currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs SWKS's 71.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.21x | 1.96x | 1.55x | 1.70x | 1.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $175.79 | $437.68 | $223.66 | $103.17 | $90.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $53.78 | $198.43 | $121.99 | $46.92 | $51.92 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.0% | +94.3% | +90.6% | +98.5% | +71.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 78.5 | 68.0 | 80.1 | 82.5 | 55.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 24.8M | 23.3M | 15.1M | 9.0M | 3.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — QCOM and SWKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MRVL as "Buy", AVGO as "Buy", QCOM as "Hold", MCHP as "Buy", SWKS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.6% upside for AVGO (target: $444) vs -19.1% for MRVL (target: $130). For income investors, SWKS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.29% vs MRVL's 0.15%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $129.52 | $443.72 | $175.00 | $87.00 | $62.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 72 | 58 | 69 | 46 | 59 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | +0.6% | +1.7% | +1.8% | +4.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 16 | 23 | 5 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.24 | $2.30 | $3.44 | $1.82 | $2.79 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | +0.3% | +4.1% | +0.2% | +0.5% |
AVGO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). SWKS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
MRVL vs AVGO vs QCOM vs MCHP vs SWKS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MRVL or AVGO or QCOM or MCHP or SWKS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Marvell Technology, Inc.
(MRVL) is the stronger pick with 42. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) offers the better valuation at 21. 1x trailing P/E (13. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) a "Buy" — based on 72 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MRVL or AVGO or QCOM or MCHP or SWKS?
On trailing P/E, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) is the cheapest at 21. 1x versus Broadcom Inc. at 86. 5x. On forward P/E, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Broadcom Inc. wins at 0. 73x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 06x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MRVL or AVGO or QCOM or MCHP or SWKS?
Over the past 5 years, Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) delivered a total return of +833. 6%, compared to -55. 5% for Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AVGO returned +29. 0% versus SWKS's +31. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MRVL or AVGO or QCOM or MCHP or SWKS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 36β versus Marvell Technology, Inc. 's 2. 21β — meaning MRVL is approximately 62% more volatile than SWKS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 80% for Broadcom Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MRVL or AVGO or QCOM or MCHP or SWKS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marvell Technology, Inc.
(MRVL) is pulling ahead at 42. 1% versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Marvell Technology, Inc. grew EPS 401. 0% year-over-year, compared to -100. 1% for Microchip Technology Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, AVGO leads at 24. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MRVL or AVGO or QCOM or MCHP or SWKS?
Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 2% net margin versus -0. 0% for Microchip Technology Incorporated — meaning it keeps 36. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AVGO leads at 39. 9% versus 6. 7% for MCHP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVGO leads at 67. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MRVL or AVGO or QCOM or MCHP or SWKS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 73x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 06x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) trades at 13. 8x forward P/E versus 64. 8x for Microchip Technology Incorporated — 51. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVGO: 7. 6% to $443. 72.
08Which pays a better dividend — MRVL or AVGO or QCOM or MCHP or SWKS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) offers the highest yield at 4. 3%, versus 0. 1% for Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL).
09Is MRVL or AVGO or QCOM or MCHP or SWKS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
7% yield, +350. 2% 10Y return). Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) carries a higher beta of 1. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (QCOM: +350. 2%, AVGO: +29. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MRVL and AVGO and QCOM and MCHP and SWKS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MRVL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AVGO is a mega-cap high-growth stock; QCOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock; MCHP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SWKS is a small-cap income-oriented stock. AVGO, QCOM, MCHP, SWKS pay a dividend while MRVL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.