Entertainment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MSGE vs CHDN vs PENN vs DKNG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
MSGE vs CHDN vs PENN vs DKNG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $3.15B | $6.19B | $2.24B | $12.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.16B | $2.95B | $6.96B | $6.05B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $42M | $388M | $-843M | $4M |
| Gross Margin | 31.5% | 33.8% | 30.6% | 41.3% |
| Operating Margin | 10.1% | 23.6% | -7.9% | -0.2% |
| Forward P/E | 56.8x | 12.8x | 23.0x | 99.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.20B | $5.20B | $8.38B | $1.93B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $43M | $289M | $687M | $1.60B |
MSGE vs CHDN vs PENN vs DKNG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Madison Square Gard… (MSGE) | 100 | 84.2 | -15.8% |
| Churchill Downs Inc… (CHDN) | 100 | 134.0 | +34.0% |
| PENN Entertainment,… (PENN) | 100 | 51.1 | -48.9% |
| DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) | 100 | 63.5 | -36.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MSGE vs CHDN vs PENN vs DKNG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MSGE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +83.6% vs DKNG's -27.3%
CHDN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 0.5%
- 317.2% 10Y total return vs DKNG's 157.3%
- Beta 0.70, yield 0.5%, current ratio 0.60x
- Lower P/E (12.8x vs 99.1x)
PENN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
DKNG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth 99.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, current ratio 1.03x
- 27.0% revenue growth vs MSGE's -1.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.0% revenue growth vs MSGE's -1.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.8x vs 99.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.2% margin vs PENN's -12.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.70 vs PENN's 1.34 | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield; 6-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +83.6% vs DKNG's -27.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.2% ROA vs PENN's -5.7%, ROIC 9.4% vs 1.8% |
MSGE vs CHDN vs PENN vs DKNG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MSGE vs CHDN vs PENN vs DKNG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CHDN leads in 2 of 6 categories
MSGE leads 1 • PENN leads 0 • DKNG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MSGE and CHDN and DKNG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PENN is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.0B annually — 6.0x MSGE's $1.2B. CHDN is the more profitable business, keeping 13.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PENN's -12.1%. On growth, MSGE holds the edge at +59.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $2.9B | $7.0B | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $245M | $932M | -$105M | $266M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $42M | $388M | -$843M | $4M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $289M | $734M | -$169M | $612M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.5% | +33.8% | +30.6% | +41.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.1% | +23.6% | -7.9% | -0.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +13.2% | -12.1% | +0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.0% | +24.9% | -2.4% | +10.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +59.4% | +3.2% | +8.2% | +42.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -123.5% | +13.7% | +37.5% | +192.9% |
Valuation Metrics
CHDN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.7x trailing earnings, CHDN trades at a 81% valuation discount to MSGE's 86.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CHDN's 11.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DKNG's 49.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.2B | $6.2B | $2.2B | $12.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.3B | $11.1B | $9.9B | $12.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 86.64x | 16.70x | -2.88x | -3113.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 56.83x | 12.75x | 22.95x | 99.14x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.17x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 23.97x | 11.38x | 13.81x | 49.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.35x | 2.12x | 0.32x | 2.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 6.01x | 1.33x | 19.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 33.88x | 12.51x | — | 19.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CHDN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHDN delivers a 35.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-35 for PENN. DKNG carries lower financial leverage with a 3.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CHDN's 4.92x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DKNG scores 7/9 vs PENN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.7% | +35.7% | -34.7% | +0.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.8% | +5.2% | -5.7% | +0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.5% | +9.4% | +1.8% | -0.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.0% | +11.1% | +2.0% | -0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 4.92x | 4.58x | 3.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.2B | $4.9B | $7.7B | $330M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $43M | $289M | $687M | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $5.2B | $8.4B | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.43x | 5.25x | -1.02x | 1.92x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MSGE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CHDN five years ago would be worth $9,021 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,936 for PENN. Over the past 12 months, MSGE leads with a +83.6% total return vs DKNG's -27.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MSGE at 24.9% vs CHDN's -14.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.8% | -20.6% | +12.9% | -29.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +83.6% | -3.5% | +6.7% | -27.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +94.8% | -38.3% | -35.3% | +4.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.2% | -9.8% | -80.6% | -47.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.6% | +317.2% | +11.9% | +157.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.9% | -14.9% | -13.5% | +1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MSGE and CHDN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CHDN is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PENN's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSGE currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs DKNG's 51.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.94x | 0.70x | 1.34x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $69.86 | $118.46 | $20.61 | $48.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.31 | $80.24 | $11.65 | $20.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.5% | +75.0% | +81.4% | +51.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.6 | 47.3 | 55.1 | 55.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 312K | 1.0M | 4.4M | 12.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MSGE as "Buy", CHDN as "Buy", PENN as "Buy", DKNG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.0% upside for CHDN (target: $145) vs -0.6% for MSGE (target: $66). CHDN is the only dividend payer here at 0.49% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $66.29 | $144.84 | $19.88 | $36.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 23 | 47 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.5% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 6 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.43 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.3% | +6.9% | +15.8% | +6.6% |
CHDN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). MSGE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
MSGE vs CHDN vs PENN vs DKNG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MSGE or CHDN or PENN or DKNG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is the stronger pick with 27. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 7% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE). Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) offers the better valuation at 16. 7x trailing P/E (12. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MSGE or CHDN or PENN or DKNG?
On trailing P/E, Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) is the cheapest at 16.
7x versus Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. at 86. 6x. On forward P/E, Churchill Downs Incorporated is actually cheaper at 12. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MSGE or CHDN or PENN or DKNG?
Over the past 5 years, Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) delivered a total return of -9.
8%, compared to -80. 6% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHDN returned +317. 2% versus MSGE's -24. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MSGE or CHDN or PENN or DKNG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
70β versus PENN Entertainment, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning PENN is approximately 92% more volatile than CHDN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 5% for Churchill Downs Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MSGE or CHDN or PENN or DKNG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is pulling ahead at 27. 0% versus -1. 7% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DraftKings Inc. grew EPS 99. 2% year-over-year, compared to -184. 4% for PENN Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKNG leads at 39. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MSGE or CHDN or PENN or DKNG?
Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
0% net margin versus -12. 1% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHDN leads at 25. 2% versus -0. 3% for DKNG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSGE leads at 43. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MSGE or CHDN or PENN or DKNG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) trades at 12.
8x forward P/E versus 99. 1x for DraftKings Inc. — 86. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHDN: 63. 0% to $144. 84.
08Which pays a better dividend — MSGE or CHDN or PENN or DKNG?
In this comparison, CHDN (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. MSGE, PENN, DKNG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MSGE or CHDN or PENN or DKNG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
70), +317. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHDN: +317. 2%, PENN: +11. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MSGE and CHDN and PENN and DKNG?
These companies operate in different sectors (MSGE (Communication Services) and CHDN (Consumer Cyclical) and PENN (Consumer Cyclical) and DKNG (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MSGE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CHDN is a small-cap deep-value stock; PENN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 29%
- Gross Margin > 18%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.