Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MSGS vs BRLS vs MANU vs SMPL vs NOMD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MSGS
Madison Square Garden Sports Corp.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$8.00B
5Y Perf.+74.1%
BRLS
Borealis Foods Inc.

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$33M
5Y Perf.-85.3%
MANU
Manchester United plc

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNYSE • GB
Market Cap$3.30B
5Y Perf.+20.9%
SMPL
The Simply Good Foods Company

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.24B
5Y Perf.-69.1%
NOMD
Nomad Foods Limited

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • GB
Market Cap$1.44B
5Y Perf.-65.3%

MSGS vs BRLS vs MANU vs SMPL vs NOMD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MSGS logoMSGS
BRLS logoBRLS
MANU logoMANU
SMPL logoSMPL
NOMD logoNOMD
IndustryEntertainmentPackaged FoodsEntertainmentPackaged FoodsPackaged Foods
Market Cap$8.00B$33M$3.30B$1.24B$1.44B
Revenue (TTM)$1.07B$28M$655M$1.45B$3.03B
Net Income (TTM)$-17M$-18M$-9M$91M$137M
Gross Margin25.9%9.7%64.8%34.0%27.1%
Operating Margin0.4%-46.0%2.8%14.4%10.7%
Forward P/E7.4x6.2x
Total Debt$1.18B$32M$645M$304M$2.29B
Cash & Equiv.$153M$653K$86M$98M$325M

MSGS vs BRLS vs MANU vs SMPL vs NOMDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MSGS
BRLS
MANU
SMPL
NOMD
StockOct 21May 26Return
Madison Square Gard… (MSGS)100174.1+74.1%
Borealis Foods Inc. (BRLS)10014.7-85.3%
Manchester United p… (MANU)100120.9+20.9%
The Simply Good Foo… (SMPL)10030.9-69.1%
Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD)10034.7-65.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MSGS vs BRLS vs MANU vs SMPL vs NOMD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NOMD leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. The Simply Good Foods Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. MSGS and BRLS also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
MSGS
Madison Square Garden Sports Corp.
The Long-Run Compounder

MSGS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 321.1% 10Y total return vs NOMD's 40.1%
  • +74.7% vs BRLS's -73.6%
Best for: long-term compounding
BRLS
Borealis Foods Inc.
The Growth Play

BRLS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 33.4%, EPS growth -7.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.6%
  • 33.4% revenue growth vs NOMD's -2.2%
Best for: growth exposure
MANU
Manchester United plc
The Communication Services Pick

Among these 5 stocks, MANU doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: communication services exposure
SMPL
The Simply Good Foods Company
The Quality Compounder

SMPL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 6.3% margin vs BRLS's -65.7%
  • 3.7% ROA vs BRLS's -31.6%, ROIC 8.1% vs -62.0%
Best for: quality and efficiency
NOMD
Nomad Foods Limited
The Income Pick

NOMD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 7.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.07, Low D/E 91.8%, current ratio 1.07x
  • Beta 0.07, yield 7.1%, current ratio 1.07x
  • Lower P/E (6.2x vs 7.4x)
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBRLS logoBRLS33.4% revenue growth vs NOMD's -2.2%
ValueNOMD logoNOMDLower P/E (6.2x vs 7.4x)
Quality / MarginsSMPL logoSMPL6.3% margin vs BRLS's -65.7%
Stability / SafetyNOMD logoNOMDBeta 0.07 vs MANU's 0.92, lower leverage
DividendsNOMD logoNOMD7.1% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)MSGS logoMSGS+74.7% vs BRLS's -73.6%
Efficiency (ROA)SMPL logoSMPL3.7% ROA vs BRLS's -31.6%, ROIC 8.1% vs -62.0%

MSGS vs BRLS vs MANU vs SMPL vs NOMD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MSGSMadison Square Garden Sports Corp.
FY 2025
Event-related
44.5%$463M
Local Media Rights
27.5%$286M
Sponsorship, signage and suite licenses
22.1%$230M
League Distribution
5.9%$61M
BRLSBorealis Foods Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

MANUManchester United plc
FY 2025
Commercial
38.7%$333M
Sponsorship
21.9%$188M
Broadcasting
20.1%$173M
Matchday
18.6%$160M
Broadcasting Other
0.7%$6M
SMPLThe Simply Good Foods Company
FY 2025
Shipping and Handling
100.0%$103M
NOMDNomad Foods Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

MSGS vs BRLS vs MANU vs SMPL vs NOMD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSMPLLAGGINGMANU

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SMPL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

NOMD is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.0B annually — 108.7x BRLS's $28M. SMPL is the more profitable business, keeping 6.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BRLS's -65.7%. On growth, MSGS holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMSGS logoMSGSMadison Square Ga…BRLS logoBRLSBorealis Foods In…MANU logoMANUManchester United…SMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…NOMD logoNOMDNomad Foods Limit…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.1B$28M$655M$1.4B$3.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$8M-$11M$238M$231M$435M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$17M-$18M-$9M$91M$137M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$3M-$5M-$135M$174M$252M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+25.9%+9.7%+64.8%+34.0%+27.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+0.4%-46.0%+2.8%+14.4%+10.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-1.5%-65.7%-1.4%+6.3%+4.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+0.3%-17.4%-20.6%+12.0%+8.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.8%-7.6%-4.2%-0.3%-2.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+6.5%+21.7%+115.1%-31.6%-123.1%
SMPL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NOMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 9.5x trailing earnings, NOMD trades at a 22% valuation discount to SMPL's 12.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SMPL's 6.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MSGS's 501.2x.

MetricMSGS logoMSGSMadison Square Ga…BRLS logoBRLSBorealis Foods In…MANU logoMANUManchester United…SMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…NOMD logoNOMDNomad Foods Limit…
Market CapShares × price$8.0B$33M$3.3B$1.2B$1.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$9.0B$65M$4.1B$1.4B$3.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-357.55x-1.23x-74.04x12.20x9.46x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.39x6.23x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.51x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple501.20x15.41x5.97x7.34x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue7.70x1.19x3.64x0.86x0.40x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share12.53x0.70x0.52x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF90.96x86.79x7.86x4.85x
NOMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SMPL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

NOMD delivers a 5.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-4 for BRLS. SMPL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MANU's 3.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MSGS scores 5/9 vs NOMD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricMSGS logoMSGSMadison Square Ga…BRLS logoBRLSBorealis Foods In…MANU logoMANUManchester United…SMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…NOMD logoNOMDNomad Foods Limit…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-3.7%-4.8%+5.2%+5.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-1.1%-31.6%-0.5%+3.7%+2.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+1.5%-62.0%-2.0%+8.1%+5.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+1.5%-83.0%-2.1%+9.4%+6.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–954554
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage3.33x0.17x0.92x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.0B$32M$559M$206M$2.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$153M$652,965$86M$98M$325M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.2B$32M$645M$304M$2.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.68x-2.28x0.62x6.77x2.52x
SMPL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MSGS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MSGS five years ago would be worth $18,446 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,568 for BRLS. Over the past 12 months, MSGS leads with a +74.7% total return vs BRLS's -73.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MSGS at 17.6% vs BRLS's -47.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMSGS logoMSGSMadison Square Ga…BRLS logoBRLSBorealis Foods In…MANU logoMANUManchester United…SMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…NOMD logoNOMDNomad Foods Limit…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+28.5%-13.0%+21.2%-36.4%-15.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+74.7%-73.6%+32.7%-64.8%-43.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+62.8%-85.3%+2.2%-67.8%-40.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+84.5%-84.3%+16.6%-64.3%-59.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+321.1%-84.3%+19.9%+3.7%+40.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+17.6%-47.3%+0.7%-31.5%-15.8%
MSGS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MANU and NOMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NOMD is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MANU's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MANU currently trades 97.4% from its 52-week high vs BRLS's 21.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMSGS logoMSGSMadison Square Ga…BRLS logoBRLSBorealis Foods In…MANU logoMANUManchester United…SMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…NOMD logoNOMDNomad Foods Limit…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.63x0.15x0.94x0.34x0.08x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$345.50$7.05$19.65$36.92$19.71
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$186.00$0.60$13.22$10.21$9.17
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.2%+21.8%+97.4%+33.7%+51.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.456.664.242.958.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded223K290K307K2.8M1.6M
Evenly matched — MANU and NOMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

NOMD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MSGS as "Buy", MANU as "Hold", SMPL as "Buy", NOMD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 47.3% upside for SMPL (target: $18) vs -6.2% for MANU (target: $18). NOMD is the only dividend payer here at 7.06% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricMSGS logoMSGSMadison Square Ga…BRLS logoBRLSBorealis Foods In…MANU logoMANUManchester United…SMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…NOMD logoNOMDNomad Foods Limit…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$382.80$17.95$18.33$13.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts29102413
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.0%+7.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises012
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.03$0.61
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%0.0%0.0%+4.1%+16.5%
NOMD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

SMPL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NOMD leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallThe Simply Good Foods Compa… (SMPL)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MSGS vs BRLS vs MANU vs SMPL vs NOMD: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MSGS or BRLS or MANU or SMPL or NOMD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the stronger pick with 9.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD). Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (6. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. (MSGS) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MSGS or BRLS or MANU or SMPL or NOMD?

On trailing P/E, Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) is the cheapest at 9.

5x versus The Simply Good Foods Company at 12. 2x. On forward P/E, Nomad Foods Limited is actually cheaper at 6. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MSGS or BRLS or MANU or SMPL or NOMD?

Over the past 5 years, Madison Square Garden Sports Corp.

(MSGS) delivered a total return of +84. 5%, compared to -84. 3% for Borealis Foods Inc. (BRLS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSGS returned +318. 0% versus BRLS's -85. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MSGS or BRLS or MANU or SMPL or NOMD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

08β versus Manchester United plc's 0. 94β — meaning MANU is approximately 1133% more volatile than NOMD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for Manchester United plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MSGS or BRLS or MANU or SMPL or NOMD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is pulling ahead at 9.

0% versus -2. 2% for Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Manchester United plc grew EPS 72. 1% year-over-year, compared to -733. 3% for Borealis Foods Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BRLS leads at 26. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MSGS or BRLS or MANU or SMPL or NOMD?

The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the more profitable company, earning 7.

1% net margin versus -91. 5% for Borealis Foods Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMPL leads at 15. 1% versus -73. 7% for BRLS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MANU leads at 82. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MSGS or BRLS or MANU or SMPL or NOMD more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) trades at 6.

2x forward P/E versus 7. 4x for The Simply Good Foods Company — 1. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SMPL: 47. 3% to $18. 33.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MSGS or BRLS or MANU or SMPL or NOMD?

In this comparison, NOMD (7.

1% yield) pays a dividend. MSGS, BRLS, MANU, SMPL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is MSGS or BRLS or MANU or SMPL or NOMD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

08), 7. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NOMD: +31. 8%, MANU: +23. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MSGS and BRLS and MANU and SMPL and NOMD?

These companies operate in different sectors (MSGS (Communication Services) and BRLS (Consumer Defensive) and MANU (Communication Services) and SMPL (Consumer Defensive) and NOMD (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MSGS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BRLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MANU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMPL is a small-cap deep-value stock; NOMD is a small-cap deep-value stock. NOMD pays a dividend while MSGS, BRLS, MANU, SMPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MSGS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BRLS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MANU

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SMPL

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NOMD

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 16%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MSGS and BRLS and MANU and SMPL and NOMD on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MSGS: 12.8% · BRLS: -7.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.